Uncyclopedia:VFH/HowTo:Become Writer of the Month

Article: HowTo:Become Writer of the Month	Score: 2.5 WotM winners
Nominated by:	Æ 23:45, 29 December 2007 (UTC)
For: 10.5	Nom and For - great read. This might even help me become Writer of the Month in the future... --Æ 23:45, 29 December 2007 (UTC) Emphatic for. - Decembar. goddammit. Contestant CUN -- VFH NotM Buzz Ctrbs 04:45, 30 December 2007 (UTC) Jealous for. ~ Mordillo where is my BITCH? 12:49, 30 December 2007 (UTC) BWAHAHAHAHA! --THE 14:58, 30 December 2007 (UTC) Very jealous good nom by AE there! Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 30) 15:23 Excellent--OliverKnight 16:25, 30 December 2007 (UTC) December Can I win now? -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 19:53, 30 December 2007 (UTC) For. I loved this one. I'd have voted earlier but I thought I already did. It's not all one joke, either, if you read it. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 01:48 Dec 31, 2007 Great page, but I already did that. The Es are awfully repetitive, but it all pays off in the end. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:25, Dec 31 For that was great. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Okran (talk • contribs) For The Vietnam War vet thing was gold -- 203.214.131.148 06:43, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Against: 8	Against. It's funny, but it seems to be a one joke article. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 12:46, Dec. 30, 2007 12:46, 30 December 2007 (UTC) Against One quite good laugh in the middle with the "mistake", but other than that it's merely passable.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 18:11, 30 December 2007 (UTC) Against. Not quite featurable. Too much of one low-quality joke. Marshal Uncyclopedian! Talk to me! Against. Meh. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 03:32, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Against One trick pony. --THINKER 09:23, 1 January 2008 (UTC) Against. Per Modus. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 13:07, 1 January 2008 (UTC) Against - Just not funny enough, really. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 02:02, 2 January 2008 (UTC) Against -RA HB 04:19, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Comments	So what Kip? I'm sure we've featured plenty one-joke articles in the past--Æ 15:26, 30 December 2007 (UTC) There are a lot of articles that could be construed as "one-joke." Look at Cowboy Bebop, for example. It's still good. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 04:25, Dec 31 Yes, but those jokes were funny enough for feature, in my opinion. This one seems kinda lame. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 10:00, Dec. 31, 2007 10:00, 31 December 2007 (UTC) Isn't that the point? Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 31) 15:03 Yes, if you mean "it's funny because it's lame". What I meant was that it's too lame for the front page. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 09:35, Jan. 1, 2008 09:35, 1 January 2008 (UTC)