| Article: Forum:Article huffing
|
Score: 5 crazy doctors
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
|
For: 17
|
- NF Someone's going to have to write up a brief introduction to it to place on the front page, but I truly believe this episode of multiple personalities deserves highlight.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 23:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- FUCK YES well maybe shut up, don't doubt him, he's an admin you shut up YARGH I'M TINY no, that's just what she said – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 23:29 Mar 29, 2008
- It's great, but it's still not "Forum:Admins keep deleting my pages" great --
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  23:57, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- Brilliant A+ job. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:13, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- A+ job. No, it sucked. No, you're dumb. Le Cejak • <Mar 30, 2008 [5:39]>
- For. Just awesome. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:46, Mar 30
- For, though I resent the part where I come in and start telling everyone to be nice. That's below the belt. Er, I mean, where Dr. Skullthumper does that...--<<
 >> 11:51, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- 4 - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon
 (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:51, Mar 30
- Comment: Are you nuts!? How could you possibly vote to feature this? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:51, Mar 30
- Probably because he likes it, you tool! - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:51, Mar 30
- Don't call him a tool, you medieval dickweed!
- Fucking "Bill & Ted"... - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 15:51, Mar 30
 It's a forum page, but it's so much more. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 16:14, 30 Mar 2008- I can't believe I'm voting for this, but as long as someone (preferably Skull) writes something good for the blurb, this could be bloody brilliant. Reminds me of this somewhat too, for some odd reason. –—Hv (talk) 30/03 20:08
- Oh my GOD. I finally see what became of my "Skullthumper is no asshat" message! That's EPIC. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 00:01 Apr 1
- For, Bin thinking about nominating this myself for sometimes... MrN
 12:00, Apr 1
- For - UnIdiot |
 | Talk | Contribs - 18:42, Apr 1
- For setting a dangerous precedent. Though I worry about subsequent forum page nominations, the idea of featuring one seems so very fitting. With the addition of a suitable blurb (TKF's for instance) this will be a great one to use. --OptyC Sucks!
 CUN 00:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- The fence broke Strong For --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     13:55, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
 For. Me likey. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 00:11, 8 April 2008 (UTC)- For. --PET
 03:14, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 12
|
- Against. It's proof that aliens exist, but it's way too in jokey. ~ 09:01, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- I see why you all think its funny, I just think it isn't funny :( Robertodole 19:47, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Rick roll makes me hungry for editors. ~ QUILz ( talk | contrib ) 23:56, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against Hilarious, but in-jokey. I --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 02:53, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- No. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 00:39, Apr. 3, 2008
- Against-with respect, I don't think it's funny--Sycamore (Talk) 08:32, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against-And not because it is a forum topic! It just seems a bit disordered, and 'injocular' (if thats a word!).--Knucmo2 15:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yay! more ridiculous bullshit! Who was wondering why participation has halved itself recently? --THINKER 15:58, 4 April 2008 (UTC)
- Me me me!!! --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
- I have a guess! Is it because of the ridiculous bullshit? - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 01:36, Apr 9
- No, sir. I don't get it. YouFang 20:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
- Weak Against. As much as I love bizarre in-jokes, the purpose of the FA is to highlight some of our best material and possibly even attract new users. If I was a n00b and I showed up and saw this in the featured slot, I'd say "what the fuck?" and leave. /me END. --THE 01:09, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
- Strong Against for the same reason Talk:Euroipods isn't featured. —Hinoa talk.kun 01:40, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
- Against What a surprise. Another in-joke taking the most votes in VFH. Read a real article people. -RAHB 21:43, 9 April 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- By the way, I'm calling out everyone who even thinks about voting against this just because it's a forum topic and not a "real" article, whatever that means. This is brilliant, and anyone who would against it for that flimsy reason is way too anal and, I might add, vastly outside of the spirit of Uncyclopedia. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 01:28, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Blurb'd -- TKFUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK 19:53, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Sitting on the fence (leaning to For (preempting Modus chasing me off with a broom)) I like it but... yeah --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:53, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
|
For. Me likey. 
