Forum:I know how we can REALLY cut down on crap so we don't have to spend so much time huffing!

Forums: Index > Village Dump > I know how we can REALLY cut down on crap so we don't have to spend so much time huffing!

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6376 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Remember the old John Seigenthaler incident on Wikipedia? I recall they implemented a brilliant new policy after that. Only registered users of 3+ days old are allowed to create pages. Damn, why haven\'t we implemented that? --User:Nintendorulez 23:09, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

That\'s brilliant! --General Insineratehymn 23:38, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I\'m \'\'\'for\'\'\' it. It should be noted that they can\'t \'\'create a page\'\', but could still \'\'edit\'\' under said policy. Good idea. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 23:41, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

Obligatory poll for this idea

Score: -11

• \'\'\'For\'\'\' --General Insineratehymn 23:44, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'For\'\'\'--Winstanley1 23:50, 9 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' Guests, those \"good ones\" who just haven\'t found their land legs yet should be able to create articles. Mr. Briggs Inc. 00:12, 10 November 2006 (UTC) Eh?
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' I think this against the wishes of Cron. sorry--The Right Honourable Maj Sir Elvis UmP KUN FIC MDA VFH Bur. CM and bars UGM F@H (Petition) 00:14, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\', but it might be a good idea in their welcome message to tell new users how to create a sandbox page within their user page, if it doesn\'t already.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:58, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against.\'\'\' Indeed, it has been brought up before and it was decided that this is not within the site\'s interests. We are a wiki, not a wikipedia.   t o m p k i n s  blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 01:18, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' just as last time this was proposed, and the time before that, and the time before that... —rc (t) 02:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' Would never have stuck around if I couldn\'t attempt to write my own content--Witt, of UNion Entertain me* 03:00, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\', because then I\'d have to use my actual account to write articles about how gay my friends are. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:56, 10 Nov 2006
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\'. It\'s called Template:Construction. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 05:23, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Support.\'\'\'--\'\'\'Jtaylor1\'\'\' 11:47, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'No\'\'\' Before I bothered to register, I wrote several articles. (albeit mediocre) --no, yuo chat 12:41, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' as per everyone above. -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:16, 10 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' per Cody, and everyone above — except for the people who voted for, which I\'m naturally against. ~ T. (talk) 13:22, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

Whereas I was actually \"against\" as per the \"for\" people, just to to be controversial. \'\'*bites head off dove*\'\' -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 13:49, 10 November 2006 (UTC)

• \'\'\'STRONG FUCKING AGAINST... NOW IMO GO PLAY FIND TEH SALAMI IN MAH ROFLCOPTER\'\'\' Marblefluss 05:21, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' Like Communism, sounds good \"on paper\"; but I doubt it would work in practice. -- §. | WotM | PLS | T | C | A 05:32, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' I think my voting record proves to be consistent. -- » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 07:45, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
• Extreme Lesbian \'\'\'Against\'\'\'. Yes, that\'s right, the word lesbian is an intensifier now, as in \"Are you having a good day?\" \"Yes, it\'s been lesbian pleasant.\" Or \"those flowers are lesbian much like Georgia O\'Keefe\'s\" or \"don\'t touch that stove, it\'s lesbian hot!\" That is the meaning passed onto you by your overlords. TINC. Good night. ---Rev. Isra (talk)20:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

And yes, I think the reasons for not doing this are so apparent that I\'d rather talk about lesbians than explain them. Cuz I\'m an ass like that. ---Rev. Isra (talk)20:47, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

• \'\'\'Against\'\'\' --Azazer 05:20, 12 November 2006 (UTC) That\'s a stupid idea. Your just prolonging vandilism till three days later. Its just going to be annoying. Who ever made this is discussion is an idiot. Uncyclopedia was made so people can just fuck around. Your making the site to serious. Powershot Shark Bite

I\'m a whore.--Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:25, 12 November 2006 (UTC)