User talk:Y/Arch V

Y's talk page archives 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5

This

Given you and I have never spoken directly, and I have absolutely no idea what you think have you that option, I'd appreciate you not touching my user page in the future. It's a courtesy to other users that you don't edit their user pages without their permission. Many regular users have been banned for doing exactly that. Given your edit had no actual impact, no harm - no foul. But just so you don't get banned for it in the future, or get smacked down by a user who actually would take offence at your edits, I thought you may appreciate the heads up. Nominally Humane! 10:11 01 Mar

Alright. I'm sorry for doing it as well. Best of luck on the Wikia Uncyc —  (talk) (contributions) 22:41, 1 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. If ever you feel like visiting you know where we are. Nominally Humane! 11:01 01 Mar

I responded

Check the WOTM. No I have not won it, you can win it more than once anyway. I confused UOTY for UOTM I guess.  SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 22:24 3.05.13

Ok. —  (talk) (contributions) 22:24, 5 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Sir

I'm your friendly IRS auditor, and I've noticed that you've been using the Mordillo Engine ^TM on your webpage without paying royalties. I shall proceed with a full fiscal audit to satisfy our taxation needs. Please present us with your financial records, DVD library, and two chocolate chips cookies. The large ones. ~ 13:18, 7 March 2013 (UTC)

Stuff

That's a financial record, right? My DVD library is here. Also, here are your cookies, you're "welcome". —  (talk) (contributions) 05:27, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Thank you sir. And here is your complimentary Boner.. ~ 12:35, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

You're welcome, me. —  (talk) (contributions) 21:40, 8 March 2013 (UTC)

Against votes

My dearest Y. First...I'll review your article with pleasure. Very soon. Second, different users have different ideas what writer and user of the month is. I see it as a way of celebrating users who contribute to the wiki or write great articles. A few users see it as a competition. If it was a competition though, users would win it more than once. TKF would have won it many times. Voting against a user is very rare, and the last time that happened, it created drama (of which I unrepentingly played a part). You can vote against if you like, but I'd suggest that your vote is better spent nominating someone else and voting for them. --ShabiDOO 00:58, 9 March 2013 (U

OK, but can I have banana pancakes? —  (talk) (contributions) 06:06, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Your timing could not be better. I have a dumptruck full of banana pancakes, and since my religion forbids me from eating food, I just don't know what to do with them.

--ShabiDOO 17:21, 9 March 2013 (UTC)

Hey, I'm right here! —  (talk) (contributions) 05:07, 10 March 2013 (UTC)

I'm not trying to attack you, but I need to warn you.

As per above, I am not intending to attack you. Take this as more of a warning. Not a warning, but a warning. Taking if you didn't read the articles beforehand, I doubt that you read 13 articles in 7 minutes. You're not fooling anyone. I'm gonna point some stuff out. The Woodburninator is in the Hall of Shame with 9 features, so this guy is obviously funny. RAHB has 20+ features and voted for. And all 9 of the for votes came from Hall of Shame writers with talent and they do know funny when they see it. And seeing this was basically the trend with all of the 13 articles, with in fact AGAINST on all of them is suspicious. Not saying all of them were feature worthy, but you're coming off with a trait of retaliation. And taking that, you aren't in the Hall of Shame and recently nominated something that could have easily been nominated for VFD and deleted with swiftness. Don't let this bring you down, but you're going to need to work on your articles a lot more. So do I. I know this because I was in the same situation as you are.

Basically all I'm saying is, you're not fooling anyone. You didn't read all of them and/or your votes weren't seriously factored within yourself. I advise you to reread MOST OF THEM, AND IT'D BE NICE IF YOU REREAD ALL and make some serious votes.

By the chance you didn't do any of the above, just explain. And remember, this is not me attacking you, I'm trying to be helpful. You're getting a bad reputation around here on this trend. Not only that but multiple users have become irritated with you and considered you a troll. You're not a troll, though. In a couple of years, you'll be on the way to 20+ features if you do well! I believe in you.

But seriously, with this voting rate, we don't need arrogant vote run-throughs. We just don't need 'em.

 Sir Peasewhizz Biblio HOS Awards 22:23 3.19.13

If you want you can strike them all out - it was a joke, and I was going to remove most of them later. —  (talk) (contributions) 01:55:10 2013/03/20 UTC

Aaahhh pulling the ol April Fools card early eh? I can't. I'm on my iPod. Thanks for telling the truth, you'll have to strike them out. Silly me. Good judging in the HMC!!  Sir Peasewhizz Biblio HOS Awards 01:58 3.20.13

Thank you, I'd also like to apologize. What's the difference between a warningand a warning? —  (talk) (contributions) 02:32:03 2013/03/20 UTC

Scoring

Hey...the competition still has two hours to go. Unless a user has explicitly said their done...you ought to wait please. Thanks biatch. --ShabiDOO 01:16, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Everyone that I judged said they're done —  (talk) (contributions) 01:45:21 2013/03/22 UTC

Okay...great. --ShabiDOO 01:47, 22 March 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!

Thank you for judging Happy Monkey, and thanks for the nice score you gave my page. I've been polishing it off and on since the contest closed (at a secret site) and it's much better now. So this was a fun one - and Zombiebaron had the topic I assigned! You are a gentleletter and a scholar. Aleister 1:02 24-3-'13

Thanks! You're welcome. It was a pleasure reading and judging your article. —  (talk) (contributions) 19:22:15 2013/03/24 UTC

My dearest Judge

I allowed a late entry The contestant offered me Thai massages for the next five years. Could you please review Crimean_War whenever possible. Preferably no later than Thursday? I love you. --ShabiDOO 23:45, 24 March 2013 (UTC)

Sure thang. Love ya too. —  (talk) (contributions) 12:28:37 2013/03/25 UTC