User talk:Tribbuca222

Welcome!

Don't mind me. I'm just here for the enem- I MEAN WELCOME! WELCOME!

Hello, Tribbuca222, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, my name is RAHB, and I'll be your guide through the mystical land of Uncyclopedia. We'll begin the tour with a few helpful links for noobies:

• Beginner's Guide - A massive guide about how to be the best you can be at Uncyclopedia. I've honestly never read the whole thing in one sitting myself, but it is very useful if you're looking for help on a specific issue.
• Our Vanity Policies - This page details why we don't care about your friends, your school, your gay fourth period math teacher, or the homework he has you do, and in-jokes. DO NOT violate this policy.
• How to be funny and not just stupid - Our flagship link. This will tell you how to not get booed off the metaphorical stage that is Uncyclopedia. I STRONGLY suggest reading the entire thing through, perhaps more than once.
• Uncyclopedia:Best of - For a bit of inspiration. These are our featured articles. This is the kind of stuff we like to read around here.

Now that that's out of the way, take a look to your right, and you'll notice some more links, these ones are about help in general:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue
• User:RAHB/welcome - This is a longer version of this message, meant for giving you a more in-depth look at contributing.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but I do recommend it, it can be quite enjoyable, and it's a good chance to let others take notice of your writing. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example, User:Tribbuca222/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you have any other questions, feel free to ask me on my talk page, and also check out the link I mentioned earlier. Additionally, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program is there to bring experienced editors straight to you. Browse our list of available mentors, and leave them a message on their talk page. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian, and remember: Have fun with it. We are a humor wiki, so don't worry about taking things too seriously. We're here to have a good time and to have a good laugh. Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date. Once more, thank you for your contributions and welcome! I'll be seeing you around. -RAHB 06:57, 3 May 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your time

Just a few things I'd like to respond to, though.

• the fact that it strays from "the main stroyline" alot is compleatly intentional and actually just part of the joke, that there is in fact nothing to building a sandcastle and, perhaps more subtly, that Joshy is concerned with everything other than what his dad wants him to be concerned with. I was sort of hoping that people would pick up on that.

• I know my spelling is bad (and this wasn't intentional) but I doubt it deserved 3.5. Also bear in mind that you may be thinking that British spelling is wrong, when both versions of the English language are accepted on this site. If there are any genuine mis-spellings though, would you mind just sorting them for me? I have run it through a spell check and didn't see any... so if you wouldn't mind that'd be great!

• I'm glad you liked the images, I didn't actually make any of them but I think I chose and captioned them really well this time. More often than not it's something that lets my articles down.

• And just to ram home this point that I'm now starting to evangalise I DO NOT CARE IF YOU THINK IT SHOULD BE AN UNBOOK! I'll just reiterate what I said to Guildy on the review page: I like titles that suggest something and deliver something slightly -- or compleatly! -- different. It's not that big a deal, please. Don't judge just because the title doesn't conform to your ideas. I thought this place was for creative (and of course funny) writing, not fascist namespace segregation.

And maybe you'd like to read UN:PRG to better help the next person who you do a review for. It's just UU, probably wont consider this a passable review, and to be fair it could have been more helpful.

Anyway, thanks again and I hope you enjoy your time here. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 07:36 3 May 2009

Reviewed your article.

Review here.

Saberwolf116 00:50, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Those weird thing you're doing?

The suck my dick bitch pee review and the bitch template? Don't. Thanks. ~ 19:42, 4 May 2009 (UTC)

Another review for you.

Have fun with it!

Saberwolf116 17:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Hey

You reviewed my article and you seemed to really like it. Well I'd just like to point out that it's up on VFH, your vote would be apreciated. Thanks. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 06:03 6 May 2009

Hi there

Please make it one against or for vote at a time please. Also don't make it personal against writers. Thanks:-)--Sycamore (Talk) 22:25, 6 May 2009 (UTC)

Or to put it another way; continue being an asshat and you'll find yourself banned so fast even Famine would be shocked. Have a nice day. -OptyC Sucks! CUN22:29, 6 May

Don't pull shit like this again. Why the hate for Gerry, one off the best contributors on the site? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:22, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

You won't get a reply, he's been banned. for a year. Shame, he showed promise. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:39 7 May 2009

Promise at what though? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

He just seemed like he was trying is all. with a lttle bit of encouragement and love sunshine and ponies he could have become a better uncyclopedian. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 13:54 7 May 2009

Wouldn't bet on it... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:51, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

Also I'll just say I'm sorry about your sandcastle article, I would have voted for if It wasn't for that poo part. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent 13:58, 7 May 2009 (UTC)

hmm, it's ok. I guess while not stricly funny I thought it was nescessary for character developement. But it's ok, it's featured now and it's generally best to just leave VFH stuff at VFH. Other wise we'll have explosions of drama erupting all over the place and causing a horrible mess of talk pages. Glad you liked the reast of it though, :) ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:09 7 May 2009

And I saw Opty's talk, I presumed it was just some misguided atempt at a joke but I don't know where it came from. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:09 7 May 2009

Something crawled up his ass, but I'm not sure what. Oh well. -OptyC Sucks! CUN14:32, 7 May

I didn't crawl up anyone's ass! Fuck you, HATER! :( ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 14:33 7 May 2009

In case you guys didn't figure it out, he was actually 3 people (see his userpage). Saberwolf116 16:58, 23 May 2009 (UTC)

Yes but we tend to refer to God as "He" so I see no harm done. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:16 23 May 2009

Still, I disagree with banning them for a year. They were douchebags, sure, but if they went thorugh AAN, they could've become good users. Saberwolf116 00:23, 24 May 2009 (UTC)

Oh I agree. But I think they should have been seperate, with account sharing nobody would know which side they were talking to. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 00:27 24 May 2009

Yeah, i'm not sure if that's allowed or not; I asked Sannse about it. Saberwolf116 00:33, 24 May 2009 (UTC)