| Article: Solvent
|
Score: -3
|
| Nominated by:
|
silicson 15:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
|
For: 2
|
- N+F silicson 15:53, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- For.This article is has some specific funniness that I find intriguing. --79.117.118.244 16:10, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- For.I think this article has some potential and should be up there!--81.196.55.68 09:30, 13 January 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- against unless I'm missing something, this is on the borders of incoherence at times. --Mnbvcxz 16:46, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- against slightly funny but confusing --Tagstit 21:18, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Nah. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 16:49, Jan 13
- Against. Odd, reads like English wasn't the first language of the author. Hard to follow, and not really worth the effort. --UU - natter
 11:43, Jan 14
- Against. -Sockpuppet of an unregistered user 15:41, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- I corrected the score, a nom. by itself does not count as a vote. --Mnbvcxz 17:09, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- And I corrected your correction, correctly. Nom'ing but not for'ing would be ridiculous. If there is one thing that Uncyclopedia is not, it's ridiculous. I could be wrong, however. Uncyc might just be ridiculous. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 22:11, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. I don't think we should discredit people with wannabe not-first-English-language-article-writers.But I might be ridiculous. 79.117.111.45 19:19, 14 January 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
