Uncyclopedia:VFH/Captain Autofellatio

Article: Captain Autofellatio	Score: -2.5
Nominated by:	—Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:56, 4 November 2010
For: 1.5	Nom+For. This was written by Hyperbole, so it should be automatically featured. My logic is undeniable. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 14:56, 4 November 2010 For. 213.114.145.87 18:43, November 5, 2010 (UTC)
Against: 4	Against. It don't think it's that funny and It's too rude for my taste. Also the fact that Hyberpole wrote it doesn't make it make proper for being feautured. --M &M (also known as Mimo&maxus) What do you want? Wanna see my balls? 16:04, November 5, 2010 (UTC) My logic is still undeniable! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 16:08, 5 November 2010 Against. I deny it. While it is kind of amusing and ridiculously easy to make up deep meanings for it, and falsify intentions and whatnot, it's really not the sort of thing I want to see on the main page. ~ shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20101105 - 16:10 (UTC) M&M and Lyrithya, I think Socky put this up as a joke nomination. He's a strange character, and I know for a fact that he has often tried the technique shown in the article and failed. There's actually a good link to a wikipedia page on this practice as well, which I believe Socky has studied, but, alas. Aleister 16:11 5 11 Even if it's a joke nomination, I still have to vote against it. I need to vote against things; if I don't meet my daily quota of spiteful voting, I shrivel up and start making funny noises. 'Sa truth. ~ shifty eyes (talk) (stalk) -- 20101105 - 16:16 (UTC) Against. I think after going through the endless crap Captain articles on VFD...Hype had to ventilate somewhere. No a feature in my view - and not because it's rude. *RomArtusImperator ® (Orate) 19:09, November 5, 2010 (UTC) Self-against**. I think it's kind of funny, but... at the end of the day, it really is just an obscene in-joke. pillow talk 06:01, November 7, 2010 (UTC)