| Article: Brainwashing
|
Score: -3 practitioners of good neurohygiene
|
| Nominated by:
|
User:Dribdrab
|
For: 2
|
- Nomination and For: i spent a bit of time on it, touched it up after someone Pee'd on it.Numero Uno 12:29, 22 June 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, i LOL'ed. Ethye 06:05, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 5
|
- Meh Doesn't quite do it for me. You know. "It." -RAHB 09:41, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Not too bad, and some good bits. But also some more drab bits, and generally feels a bit, well, meh, as RAHB says. --UU - natter
 11:32, Jun 24
- Against as per above. ~FAG! +chatline "if it ain't broke, break it" (CUN·VFH) 17:25, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
- Against Yea, tis good in places, but still a lot more work is required to bring the whole thing up to standard. I would recommend reading through, stripping out the bits which you think are the most poor, and generally tidying it up some more. Leave it a month or so, during which time add in new ideas as them come, and maybe try again. Nice try though. MrN
 19:50, Jun 24
- Against as per above. Especially RAHB. Yes, "it". Definitely has potential though! ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 24/06 19:55
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
