From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Aliana y los Enanitos Grandes
|
Score: 6.5
|
| Nominated by:
|
~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 09:13, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
|
For: 6.5
|
 Self-nom + for. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 09:13, 23 May 2015 (UTC)- For. While intense racism, it's still quite funny.
 XY007 • talk • contributions 09:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC) XY007 • talk • contributions 09:34, 23 May 2015 (UTC)
- For. Leverage (talk) 18:50, 30 May 2015 (UTC)
- For. -- Lost Labyrinth
 • (t) • (c) • (a) 18:18, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- For. For all the things I said about it when I judged it for whatever competition it was that it was entered in. -RAHB 23:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
- For. 80.194.231.144 (talk) 21:46, 2 June 2015 (UTC)
- For. IFYMB! Talk to me baby! 13:29, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
|
Against: 0
|
No against votes
|
| Comments
|
 Comment. One thing I forgot to mention - what is all this? is it a parody or a reference i am missing? Leverage (talk) 06:27, 27 May 2015 (UTC)
- yeah... it sort of doesn't refer to anything specifically... I realise that's a problem. I suppose it's about attitudes to foreign TV held mainly by Americans and Brits? but yeah it was sort of an excuse to write what I did. ~EveryOtherUsernameWasTaken(dtf?) 22:57, 29 May 2015 (UTC)
- Oh God, trust me, that is the opposite of a problem. General semi-satire on people's attitudes and behaviors without nailing down a specific "target" that you have to identify and make a statement with is IMO the best kind of satire. The kind that you can relate to but also allows itself room to breathe and isn't consumed by a particular time period or event or anything. There's absolutely nothing wrong with this article not being a parody of some thing-of-the-week popular issue or something. -RAHB 23:21, 1 June 2015 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
| Click to feature this article
|
| Always check the feature queue first.
|
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
|
Self-nom + for. ~
Comment. One thing I forgot to mention - what is all this? is it a parody or a reference i am missing? 