Talk:Incoherent
I love this article blue pandas & no more beans till the 4th of July chucks the rock. Red green invisible purpleness wishes they could jump into punching I LOVE GUM old testiculars. This is truly da spirit of ssentnerehocnI in Americka I am Rick=IameRicka I am Rick, a dirty man. Kanye West could not have big pie I give you a pie. Recognise the duty this article has duty is doody is poo, or least at find a good damn Beavers make dams home for it for beavers to make dams. i love rocks and fish and this article it . Why Rocky fist I just said I !!! love rocks. .#jk8947fkushfkjs that was the best good article spelled backwards Backwards spelled backwards is frontwards Spell is spelled S-P-E-L-L, unless finding Nemo is an honor, and it is not or is it no gum gum.--DiZ 20:08, 16 June 2006 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
- This is a very funny article. Can someone expand it? (It's another page I want to put on VFH) --Micoolio101 (whine • vandalism) 08:26, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
- I did a little. Writing incoherently is harder than I sweat.--Procopius 21:42, 11 November 2006 (UTC)
Added one. -- Brigadier Sir Mordillo 
GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI3 AnotM VFH +S 08:37, 12 November 2006 (UTC)
I found a hint. Look for speedy deletion candidates on Wikipedia since they are usually gibberish [1]. That's how I did it. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:24, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
Totally funny. I combined several short passages of nonsense into longer passages of nonsense and added a bit.--Super90 10:16, 13 December 2006 (UTC)
I added a russian reversal; one that should fit very well into the article:
In Soviet Russia, {{noun}} {{verb plural}} YOU!!
--AAA! (AAAA) 08:38, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
I also added a retarded Bat fuck insane template. --AAA! (AAAA) 09:10, 15 December 2006 (UTC)
Idea: Spork some stuff off Random humor. --AAA! (AAAA) 04:16, 21 December 2006 (UTC)
Feature?[edit source]
To you think this page is ready for VFH yet? --AAA! (AAAA) 01:59, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
- Perhaps... --The fatgoat 22:09, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
I know this article has had a pee review before, but I want to give it a second one so we can try and further improve the article to featured status. Right now, I want to see if the opening paragraph can be expanded and the image caption at the bottom (The one with all those people in a garden) can be rewritten. --AAA! (AAAA) 06:08, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 7.5 | It's definitely a funny article, some of the lines are absolutely hilarious. |
| Concept: | 4 | It's far too similar to Random Humor, if you ask me. |
| Prose and formatting: | 7.5 | Sure. |
| Images: | 8 | Very reflective on the subject. |
| Miscellaneous: | 6 | Not enough creativity, it needs some work setting itself apart. |
| Final Score: | 33 | 33 |
| Reviewer: | --Agoistheman 18:40, 25 March 2007 (UTC) | |
| Humour: | 5 | It's hard to laugh at jokes when one has to concentrate on just making it to the next sentence. See endnotes. |
| Concept: | 6 | Well, it's a reasonable subject for an article but stuff that's incoherent tends to end up on the VFD list...so it's a hard style to be happy about. |
| Prose and formatting: | 5 | The prose tends to be disjointed and hard to read. |
| Images: | 6 | OK pictures, intentionally irrelevant. |
| Miscellaneous: | 6 | I have difficulties liking this piece -- it is incoherent, yes, but that does not make it good and may, in fact, make it bad. |
| Final Score: | 28 | |
| Reviewer: | --OEJ 18:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC) | |
Endnotes: I found this hard to read because after a very short time I did not give a darn about what was going on -- it's so random it's predictable. I couldn't predict specifically what would happen next, but I knew it would be just another thing that would have nothing to do with anything.
In my lousy opinion, randomness does not equal a good article on incoherence.
What might be better is an article that is always right on the edge of coming together and making sense, but then slips off into self-contradiction or something. --OEJ 18:04, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
| Humour: | 3 | IMHO, "But grandma failed because my toy train went swimming in the piano" is utterly hilarious. Love the formula and the guy running in a circle. Not much else though. |
| Concept: | 8 | I like the concept but nonsense is not incoherence. |
| Prose and formatting: | 2 | As said above, nonsense. |
| Images: | 2 | As said above, nonsense. |
| Miscellaneous: | 5 | I like the potential of the subject, but to pull it off you'd have to make a rambling piece that goes nowhere, much like what OEJ said. |
| Final Score: | 20 | Despite what is said by OEJ or Agoistheman, it's not really incoherent. Incoherence is rambling like gramps does, or the one-sided conversation you have with a ranting hobo, not drivel. Think "Granmpa Simpson". I disagree with previous reviews in this regard, hence the third review. As such, I'd recommend a rewrite because you're off topic, but the concept is excellent so long as you aren't remaking random humour.] |
| Reviewer: | (Gir. 23:52, 26 March 2007 (UTC)) | |
Comment[edit source]
In my opinion, "MY GODDAMN BUGGY! HIJACKED BY LEVELERS!" did it for me. -- 19:33, 12 May 2007 (UTC)