Talk:Euroipods (video game)

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Exploding-head.gif

THIS ARTICLE A SPLODE.

Storyline[edit source]

An up and coming (European) website angers millions of people, turning them into an angry mob. The Defenders of Comedy (and sometimes justice) hear the call of danger and jump into action! Who will win? Will the maniacal Nintendorulez find a way to control the mob? Or will RCMurphy be able to summon the Defenders from the four corners of the earth? The fate of Euroipods is in your hands, choose your side carefully.

IGN.com - Preview - "Euroipods is an amazingly rendered action RPG that has plans of fucking you in the ass in the late months of 2006. In this game you will be fucked in the ass as you pick a side and play through a deep, immersive story; bring your reading glasses because you'll need them to read the 15+ hours of dialogue ridden through the game. The game play mostly consists of guiding a character around a fairly obvious map, and using the X (A, on any of those other systems) button to kick baddies butts. This game will fuck you in the ass on all platforms, and will come out as a tactical shooter on the PC."

Anyone like this?--MrJimmy Journal talk 20:05, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Rofflemayo. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 20:11, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

IGN.com - Preview (cont.) - "Breaking news on Euroipods! It seems that it will also be released on the handheald systems as a cart racer, the mechanics of how this will port have not made themselves apperent."--MrJimmy Journal talk 21:51, 18 Dec 2005 (UTC)

Come on guys, for this to be a successful parody of euroipods we need to have a flame war. Bring in some guys who liked euroipods to argue with us for mocking their beloved article. Or at least pretend to hate each other and make the talk page go on forever. --AOL Vandal

I'm sorry, this artikal was a good idea, but it's not really thought provoking, or anything provokeing for that matter. I would gladly defend it if anyone wishes to declair it as useless as euroipods, but untill that time I have no comment besides the ones I've already left here.--MrJimmy Journal talk 05:16, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)

I think it could be hilarious if someone continued the video game review format and incorporated parts of talk:Euroipods into it. --—rc (t) 06:17, 31 Dec 2005 (UTC)
IGN.com - Preview (cunt cont.) - In Euroipods, you seek out the wise prophet, Anonymous IP Guy, to tell you how to defeat the evil armies of Euroipods. He responds by simply saying, I'm here to provide you with a well-researched and thought-out reply:Go fuck yourself. That is all, go back to wanking. After that, you may choose to go back to wanking as he says you should, or continue to take on the evil forces of not funny by yourself, using devastating weapons such as multiple IPs, page blanking, vandalism, and hilarious parody articles. You must destroy Euroipods so that Nintendo may rule the land.
I'd love to do this but I'm afraid of that scary "DONT EDIT THIS ASSHOLE!" tag...
Maybe it should also have an IRC-style chat thing, along the lines of talk:WWII, though I suppose that would just be the same as the talk page itself. --Sir Carlos the Mean CUN VFP CS CM CUNT (talk) 04:50, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

You know what's strange?[edit source]

I put no effort whatsoever into this page, yet i've created pages that are a lot funnier that were deleted and this is still here. I gotta try this being lazy thing more often. – Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.12.116.130 (talk • contribs)

Wtf?[edit source]

What happened to the original version that was funny and not a ripoff of Euroipods? --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 23:17, 10 March 2006 (UTC)

I think it was always a euroipods ripoff. It was created as a parody.



Commentary From Talk:Euronintendo moved here:


I liked it better the first time, when it was called euroipods (video game). Maybe I'm just mad because Nintendorulez was obviously right in vandalizing euroipods. I mean, that guy should be made an admin if he's not one already. Nintendorulez is not a nooblet, don't pwn him. --207.200.116.5 21:07, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I think I should pwn you. -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 21:29, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
Whoah, whoah, whoah. I didn't vandalize, I simply was involved in a minor edit war over two templates. And got banned over it. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 17:32, 29 January 2006 (UTC)

I feel compelled to point out that I have moral qualms with this page. I am not going to do anything, but I feel I should at least point that out and let you do with it what you will. ---Quill.gifRev. Isra (talk) 22:13, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

Nope, I'm the guy who wrote the "go fuck yourself" reply on Talk:Euroipods that Rcmurphy thought was so funny. Really, more than half the people on this site hate euroipods and took Nintendorulez's side in the flame war, so I could've been anyone. I thought Savethemooses was on his side too, or at least that's what it looked like in the fight picture. --207.200.116.5 23:28, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

THSI ARTICLE IS NOT FUNNY--Shrooms.jpgShroom!.gifGay2.gifSir Flammable KUN Prince!.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2.gifShroom!.gifShroomirror.jpg 23:29, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)

IM RIGHT SO EVERYONE CAN SOD OFF AND I SHOULD EB ADMIN BECAUSE THEN ID NEVER BAN ANYONE FOR DOING STUPID THINGS LIKE I DO, WIAT DID I JSUT SAY THAT.--Shrooms.jpgShroom!.gifGay2.gifSir Flammable KUN Prince!.gif (Na Naaaaa...)Gay2.gifShroom!.gifShroomirror.jpg 23:40, 8 Jan 2006 (UTC)
HEY I LUAGHED OUT LUOD - David Gerard 00:21, 9 Jan 2006 (UTC)

This article is not needed.[edit source]

It dosen't have anything to do with Euroipods, somone who is more on top of things should elect it for deletion.--MrJimmy Journal talk 05:07, 10 Jan 2006 (UTC)

I love this article. A funny and clever way to call readers's attention.--Rataube 22:48, 12 Jan 2006 (UTC)

To borrow a term commonly used by admins when huffing articles, I would call this slandanity. --[[User:Nintendorulez|Nintendorulez | talk]] 19:52, 30 January 2006 (UTC)

Okay guys, here's the deal.[edit source]

I want you to compile a list of games you think are entertaining and then those will be the rules by how we talk about games here. Here is an empty, pre-formatted list for you:

Games that are entertaining to me

  1. Not Euroipods (video game), which makes me very bored and tired.




Please sign your name so I know who to laugh at. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:37, 20 April 2007 (UTC)

  1. Euroipods (video game), which makes me very excited and energized!
  2. Euroipods (video game), which makes me very excited and energized!
  3. Euroipods (video game), which makes me very excited and energized!
  4. Euroipods (video game), which makes me very excited and energized!
  5. Euroipods (video game), which makes me very excited and energized!
Also, does the edit-and-die policy of the original Euroipods apply here? Sir Not A Good Username360Stress.gif KUN 19:51, 5 April 2009 (UTC)