Forum:Drama is back. And it sucks.
To everyone who will listen to me, please do not initiate Drama because Drama is the worst! It's distracting and annoying and childish. It's a total piece of junk. Junky junky junk! ALL OF IT!!!!!!!
For example, it involves complaining about little things, such as hokey religions, wikis we're the enemy of, and such. Little things are treated as the destruction of the world! What a load of junky junky junky junky junky junk is this? If you start Drama here that means you are ghey. And if you're ghey, you should probably start kitten huffing to make yourself feel better.
You guys suck. Your ideas about humour are lame. I suspect you all of being sophomoric lower beings, possibly Americans, who still have not tapped into the inner truth of irony beyond that crappy Alanis Morisette song...Seriously, I did not think it was possible, but you are far, far more evil than any internet trolls. Why? Because you are control freak humour FASCISTS. The only purpose for stirring up Drama is to let a group of internet fASCISTS spend all their days complaining about little things. It's true and you know it. Don't e-lynch me because you are in denial. Have you even heard of Dada? I doubt it. Buttmunchers. Oh. You are buttmunchers. ED? Who gives a shit? Not funny in any sense ever. Your ways of distracting the community from important things are not funny, not even slightly. Seriously. DiZ vs. the Grue Army? Stop masturbating or you'll need brail computers. What's up with you people? Are you high? I WANNA GO HOOOOOME!!!!!!!!
I HATE DRAMA!! I HATE DRAMA!! I HAET DRAMA!! I HAET DRAMA!! I HAET DRAMA!! HATE HATE HATE HAET!!
--Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 06:10, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
STFU CRAZYSWORDSMAN! DRAMA IS THE BEST THING THAT HAS EVER HAPPENED TO THIS COMMUNITY. IN FACT, I OFFICIALLY DECLARE WAR ON CRAZYSWORDSMAN! HE IS A TRAITOR TO THE LEAGUE OF BENSON! HE MUST BE DESTROYED!!!--
09:12, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- BENSON doesn't like drama either. I'd know. I've been a Bensonite longer than you. --Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C) 15:47, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
- Okay... — 07:22, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
for once i'll agree with you, csm --
15:05, 29 April 2007 (UTC)
I can't agree more with Crazyswordsman! --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 
21:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Drama is the best
To everyone who will listen to me, please initiate Drama because Drama is the best! It's distracting and annoying and childish. It's a total bunch of flowers. Flowery flowery flowers! ALL OF IT!!!!!!!
For example, it involves complaining about little things, such as hokey religions, wikis we're the enemy of, and such. Little things are treated as the destruction of the world! What a load of Flowery flowery flowers is this? If you start Drama here that means you are awesome. And if you're awesome, you should probably start kitten huffing to make yourself feel even better.
Drama is good. It's ideas about humour are actually quite funny. I suspect you all of being sophomoric lower beings, possibly Americans, who still have not tapped into the inner truth of irony beyond that crappy Alanis Morisette song...Seriously, I did not think it was possible, but drama is far, far more good than Crazyswordsman. Why? Because you are control freak humour DEMOCRATIC LEADERS. The only purpose for stirring up Drama is to let a group of internet DEMOCRATIC LEADERS spend all their days complaining about terrible, terrible things. It's true and you know it. Don't e-lynch me because you are in denial. Have you even heard of Evil? I doubt it. Heroes. Oh. You are Heroes. ED? The worst thing possible. Not funny in any sense ever. Your ways of distracting the community from important things are extremely funny, more than slightly. Seriously. DiZ vs the Grue Army? Keep spreading the good news and you'll have a nice place in heaven. What's up with you people? How come are you so cool? I WANNA GO OVER TO YOUR HOOOOOOOOOOMMME!!!!!!!!
I LOVE DRAMA!! I LOVE DRAMA!! I LOEV DRAMA!! I LOEV DRAMA!! I LOEV DRAMA!! LOVE LOVE LOVE LOEV!!
-- 09:11, 2 May 2007 (UTC)
I couldn't agree less. --Trar (talk|contribs|grueslayer) 21:10, 6 May 2007 (UTC)
Zerotrousers beeth gay for all Uncyclopedia, it seems... --Lord Fluffy who rains fire from the heavens 11:33, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Nay, it cannot be so! For there be users of homosexual persuasion who are far better suited to represent Uncyclopedia, in all its bisexual glory. Admittedly, the lack of pants makes him a strong candidate, but still... --The Acceptable
Cainad 
(Fnord) 16:57, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, zero is not due a absence of trousers, but just the size he wears, to the horror of the shopkeepers. -- herr doktor needsAV2
[scream!] 17:00, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alas, I am Zerotrousers because i have zero-trousers.--
10:34, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alas, I am Zerotrousers because i have zero-trousers.--
- It's a zen koan, I think. I know that when I ponder the mystery of zero trousers I'm all, boom!, one with infinity 'n shit. --Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:32, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Indeed - I'm still stuck on "What is the sound of one trouser?", let alone zero! -- Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 18:54, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
- Actually, zero is not due a absence of trousers, but just the size he wears, to the horror of the shopkeepers. -- herr doktor needsAV2
