User talk:Hiatus Hernia/archive1

Welcome!

Somebody has awarded you a cookie! Now go play in traffic.

Hello, Hiatus Hernia, and welcome to Uncyclopedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If not, the door's right over there... no, a little more to your left... yeah. Anyway, here are a few good links for

• Beginner's Guide
• Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your friends
• How to be funny and not just stupid

If you read anything at all, make it the above three links. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, try these:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• How to get started editing on uncyclopedia
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

At Uncyclopedia, writing articles is not a requirement, but it certainly is a fun and easy way to express your creativity. To write an article, it's recommended that you start it in your userspace (for example,User:Hiatus Hernia/Article about stuff) so you can edit it at your leisure. If you decide to create it in the cold world of mainspace, make sure it is in accordance with the policies laid out above, and if you're not done put the "Work-In-Progress" template - {{construction}} - onto it as well.

If you need help, ask me on my talk page, ask at the Dump, or ask an administrator on their talk page. You can also look into, the Uncyclopedian Adopt-a-Noob program.

OK, I know you may have seen this message on lots of other people's pages, but I still had to come to your page to leave it here. If you have absolutely any questions, no matter how trivial, feel free to ask me here.

Here are a couple of important things that you should bear in mind as a brand new user, especially if you can't be bothered reading the beginner's guide.

• Read HTBFANJS I guarantee it will be a huge help to you and will stop your early efforts being deleted on sight by administrators.
• If you want to create an article, and you wanted to call it Bleurgh, to create it in your user space you would just make the address bar look like this: www.en.uncyclopedia.co/User:(Your user-name here)/Bleurgh. Please don't create it on this page as this is where other users can contact you.
• Always remember rule 2 and be constructive and civil at all times. Honestly, it works (mostly) and it won't get you banned.
• Have fun, that is after all why we are all here.

Again, welcome!  ChiefjusticeDS 21:56, October 10, 2009 (UTC)

Hey!

Thanks for the Pee Review! It was pretty awesome for a noob. As in having been here for 33 days or less. 36.5 was definitely not harsh. Some of my reviews are so bad that the score is 19.5. There's only one thing that I'm concerned about - it's HTBFANJS. How to be funny and not just stupid. Thanks anyway! in rememberanz of all teh siggies 03:47 October 31

And for the misc thing, you might want to average the scores above, using {{pee|7|6.5|8.5|7.5}}, giving you 7.4. in rememberanz of all teh siggies 03:49 October 31

Welcome to UnNews

On your knees, worthy one! The Right Reverend Major Sir Zim_ulator blesses you. Your blessings are increasing exponentially. In the name of Sophia, the Church of Uncyclopedia and the Universal Church Triumphant of the Apathetic Agnostic, kneel and receive the melding of Zim's holy axe and your wetware. Now go write me a good UnNews article. Cheers! Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 03:48, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Reverend Zim_ulator says: "There are coffee cup stains on this copy, damnit! Now that's good UnJournalism."

Welcome to UnNews, Hiatus Hernia, and thank you for contributing some crap, or otherwise attracting my attention. For a quick introduction about how you can write a decent or better UnNews article, please take a minute read our spiffy new Style Guide.

I am your humble servant (in your dreams), and if I may be of help to you, please leave me a note on my talk page.

Good things that can happen to you

---

You can win awards and prizes! You can become a better writer by subjecting your articles to the scrutiny of UnNews critique machine or UnCanninator shit article detection system. You can become a thorn in the side of Journalism as a whole. You can get promotions, ribbons, and free crockery! You can write stuff your mom would be ashamed to show her friends.

What happened to my article?

---

If you've submitted an article, and it's disappeared, I may have mercy-moved it to your user space. This means I've probably left a message on your talk page, likely in close proximity to this very message, explaining why.

Your article may have been tagged for ICU if it has significant problems meeting our criteria, or I may have deleted it because you did not register as a user.

Finally, maybe you just pissed me off. I mean, I know I'm a Roshi, and I'm supposed to be all "Zen" about everything, but I have bad days too, you know?

UnNews Audio

---

If you are interested in doing an UnNews audio, check this out.

UnNews UnFunnies

---

At present, I create UnCartoons for UnNews all by my onesies, for better or worse. Now, I will never claim that I am a good cartoonist. Fortunately, the internet provides us a way to do all sorts of things simply and easily. I found Stripgenerator.com, a great site to create cartoons with a minimum of talent.

This document is an ongoing effort by me to enhance the obfuscation coefficient of Uncyclopedia; productive changes, and criticism are welcome. Cheers! The Right and Left Reverend Major Sir Rev. Zim_ulator (Talk) I am the dirt under your rollers 17:38, March 28, 2010 (UTC)

Review

So, I finally reviewed your article. Hope you find it helpful. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 23:27, November 4, 2009 (UTC)

You're a med. student?

Are you? • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 10:39, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

No, I'm a dental student. --~ 11:56, 2009 Nov 5

Oh, for shame. I'm a medical student myself and I though I've finally found some company.. • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 12:41, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

Silly Mahmoosha. Girls can't be doctors. They can only be nurses and secretaries. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 23:50, November 5, 2009 (UTC)

You're still convinced, aren't you? --~ 04:41, 2009 Nov 6

Fun Fact: More than 60% of Egypt's medical students are girls. • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 07:05, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Same here. We have some classes with meds. I take it you're first year? --~ 07:19, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

No, I'm second. And you? • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 07:53, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

I'm at the end of my first year. It's final exam time. --~ 07:58, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

That's weird.. Do you live in the southern hemishere or something? • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 08:01, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Obviously. You can see from my userpage that I live in Australia. --~ 08:21, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Oh. Yes... You know, we have a bunch of good Stralian users here, you should get to know them.. • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 08:35, November 6, 2009 (UTC)

Editing Perth Reply

i hvent read it through again for weeks but i will check out your work. i have an idea about a section on perth's sporting teams. --Tyypo 08:20, November 15, 2009 (UTC)

FF Pee Review

Thnx for the review. Twas very helpful and insightful. And if you mean The Rapid and the Ragey unscript, that wasn't mine which may explain a lot lol. Am working on 2 Rapid 2 Ragey at the moment though. thnx again. You australians really do make good reviewers --Matfen 11:45, November 28, 2009 (UTC)

Hi again. I made most of your suggested changes on FF, and just thought it'd be nice if you gave it a quick glance before I nom it for highlight. thnx --Matfen 18:17, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Wow, how did you know I was online? (What do you mean I'm always online?) None of this sort of rash action please! I don't think I'm qualified to judge whether an article should be on VFH. Totally not qualified at all. Ask somebody else. If you still want my opinion though I am happy to give it, just know that I am not responsible for anything that might happen to you or your article. ~ 18:32, Dec 2, 2009

Thanks for the kudos, but really, anyone is qualified to decide whether or not to put something on VFH. Now if you're looking for someone who's pretty good at predicting what will win or not, then an experienced User/Pee Reviewer might be your best bet. (Not that they're always right, of course). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:39, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

I actually had no idea you were online, just born lucky I guess. I'm sorry if my wording scared you abit, as I didn't want your approval for VFH. I was just looking to see if you liked the changes I suggested. And no worries if it goes nuclear on VFH, it's happened before. I just thought it would make a nice change pestering you, instead of the other australian reviewer I harrass on a daily basis. --Matfen 20:22, December 2, 2009 (UTC)

Why you are not only a pervert, you are also narcissistic. Matfen, I have posted a long rant on the talk page of the article. I wanted to make it shorter, but I just couldn't once I got started. Humour is subjective. Feel free to disagree with me. Really, feel free. ~ 09:20, Dec 3, 2009

Narcissistic? Perverted? ME? well, maybe one of them, but I'll leave it upto you to guess which. Thnx for your hard advice. I actually agree with some of them, which is why I will be making some of you're changes. Yes the last image isn't the best quality. I got rid of photoshop because my laptop doesn't seem to be powerful enough to play solitaire without crashing. I just use paint, hardcore style. Now, prepare for an education in Ghost Riding the Whip.

Ghost Riding the Whip, is a fine art enjoyed by many an idiot.

Step 1: Get your car moving at a relatively slow pace. Slow enough to keep up with when walking.

Step 2: When desired speed has been achieved, and you're on a long stretch of straight road, put it into cruise control.

Step 3: Get out, and walk by the side of the car, doing the most dumb dance you can think possible. You may even prefer to get on the roof of the car and flex your moves there.

You have just ghost-rode the whip. Congrats! You are clearly a superior example of humanity. I hope this explanation might bring some relevance to the picture now. It probably still doesn't though. --Matfen 12:17, December 3, 2009 (UTC)

Oh sorry it was more like, Why do I need to provide this, you are not only perverted, you are also narcissistic. I didn't mean you Mat. ~ 03:19, Dec 4, 2009

Well, yes, naturally. That's why I'm  Father WHY??? (confessions)  04:01, December 4, 2009 (UTC)

Mat, you are still not as narcissistic as Why. Why seemed to be watching my talk page obsessively for mentions of his name, and then pops up to comment on them, even though I wasn't talking to him. See also the topic below on why Why is perverted. I really enjoy insulting Why for some reason. Maybe it's because of my secret extreme infatuation with him, that I've read most of Why?'s articles and reviews and edits to other people's talk pages. --Your Stalker,~ 13:35, Dec 4, 2009 (whoops, I should have said this is in response to what is on the talk page of FF)

Oh boy. I've read about this kind of compulsive infatuation in Weekly World News. "I love you so much I'll never let you leave me so I'll keep you tied to a support beam in the basement." Excuse me while I sneak out the back door. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:29, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Will people stop getting infatuated with my son? All the time when he was a kid, everybody wanted to play with him. But Ghost Riding the Whip sounds awesome! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 04:14, December 10, 2009 (UTC)

What does infatuation have to do with "all the time when he was a kid"? That's a bit creepy, I tell ya. ~ 06:53, Dec 10, 2009

Thanks!

Avast! We at The Pirate Bay thank you for your support of our operations! If ever you find yourself in Sweden, drop by the Bay and enjoy our hospitality.

--Andorin Kato 07:26, November 30, 2009 (UTC)

Spirital Noob Ninjastar

You had the unluckiness to start in a month when another noob already had a featured article. Otherwise, I think there's a really good chance you would have been NotM. But you're a great user and I'm really glad you're here! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  01:04, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, this sausagefest could always use more girls. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:50, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. Do I write like a girl or something? ~ 10:34, Dec 1, 2009

I have decided that you are a girl and therefore you are a girl. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 14:49, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Hiatus, you have to understand that some guys here, well, even talking to a girl over their computer screen, well.... (By the way, your ninjastar has nothing to do with you being a girl; it has to do with me finding you a good, productive and talented noob). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:03, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Syndrome's inappropriateness aside, speak for yourself, Why. I navigated to Little Mermaid's talkpage and saw how you jumped to adopt any female user you think is notable, with a somewhat creepy enthusiasm. I was going to say something right there and then, but I thought better of it. You, Why, are a pervert and an old lecherous man. (Wow, I do get wordy when I attempt humour.) ~ 19:33, Dec 1, 2009

I resent that remark. I'm not all that old. (Seriously, I've welcomed 234 people so far, and only about two of them have been highly productive--Little Mermaid was one, and the other already got adopted. Besides that, for all I know Little Mermaid is really a 70-year-old male centaur. Of course I'm attracted to them too.) King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:33, December 1, 2009 (UTC)

Sorry, didn't spot your comment...

I didn't look too closely at Kakun's Holocaust Film Pee Review request, and didn't spot your promise to review it. I just went and did it. If you want to, override mine. -- Style  Guide 08:49, December 5, 2009 (UTC)

Colin

I gave your rewritten article a quick once-over earlier, and I just want to say how impressive your extensive revisions are and how flattered I am that you linked to not one, but two of my own articles, which is, needless to say, pretty awesome. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 19:47, December 6, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks. That's because I love you. ~ 20:50, Dec 6, 2009

Yeah, I know. Everybody does. I'm used to it. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 03:16, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks a lot!

You voted to make H1N1 a front-page story! Exposing millions to fear and spreading paranoia! And now the story has mutated! Misinformation everywhere! ...thanks a lot!!!

Slithy Tove 00:45, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

You win this random award I found.

For pee reviewing my article, see. I have it around here somewhere...

For the record, Fox News did actually do a report on 4chan, but they just did a report on "Anonymous" as a whole, way before scientology, and exposing them as this kind of thing. I suppose the article is at it's funniest when you're familiar with the whole 4chan thing. Anyway, I'll take some of your suggestions and improve the article on various points, except that part where it says "pokemon" I'll change "Fascination with a certain blue digimon". I think I might keep the ms paint picture, because it went well with other people who saw it. --Reverse Genocide Cockatrices 23:33, December 7, 2009 (UTC)

I guess so. I don't watch Fox. Not even for article material. Do whatever you want, it's your article. I'm good once I satisfied my need to criticise and nitpick at other people. ~ 18:25, Dec 8, 2009

I saw a poll done a while back on Fox News. They surveyed people who watched Fox News and those who didn't to determine which group was better informed about major events happening in the news. The group that knew more? Those who didn't watch Fox News. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  02:45, December 14, 2009 (UTC)

Pee Reviewed Colin Meloy Lyrics

I Pee Reviewed HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics based on version 4245708 of 17:50, November 29, 2009. I hope this helps! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:39, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

Added comments here. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:32, December 17, 2009 (UTC)

A Fast and Furious Thanks

Couldn't have done it without you! --Matfen 21:50, December 11, 2009 (UTC)

I know. I'm all smug now. ~ 15:49, Dec 12, 2009

Comrad

Thanks to your vote Julius Malema is one step closer to becoming President of South Africa. Nice going. What a wonderful thing democracy is. Now surrender your property to the government and move along. Nothing to see here. Except the featured article on 14 Dec 2009

--BlueSpiritGuy 10:35, December 15, 2009 (UTC)

Mensaje!

~Formerly Annoying Crap 23:00, 18 December 2009

OMG :)

OMG! Did you really do that!? Did you actually reviewed that article!? That's just great. Thank you very much. I would be rather scared of reading that, but you are just a master if you actually read that all and your eyes didn't start to bleed. Thanks for pointing out what's wrong and generally positive review. Cheers! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 10:16, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

Well, it did took me more than one sitting to skim through it and gather enough information to make a review. And you know, some sections sound like other sections so I kinda skipped them... in my defense it really is long... ~ 18:39, Dec 25, 2009

If you want another helping of Pee Review

Yes, I think you already know this. But just a reminder that if a Pee Review by any reviewer, including me, doesn't help you in the way you hoped, you are free to request another one. Happy editing! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  17:34, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

Oh yes, I can tell you are itching to review my article. Just admit it. ~ 18:40, Dec 25, 2009

Actually, I sent a version of this message to several people who recently got a review that might have been less than complete. But now that you mentioned it, I do rather have an itch, if you wanted to scratch it. I mean that in a non-stalking kind of way, not that I'm saying you're my stalker, even though you said you were. Also Happy Xmas! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:06, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

I know that, I wasn't serious. But yes, I would love nothing more than to scratch your itch. Would you like an official one or an unofficial one? If I'm really stalking you, I would have known how many people followed your pee review suggestions and failed to get featured, but I don't. (Or do I?) Happy Xmas to you too. ~ 19:12, Dec 25, 2009

If I say official, do I have to sign a waiver? And I see you're not only my stalker, you're a subtle stalker who leaves me guessing. Didn't I see you once in Gotham City? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:34, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

So, uhh?? Is the answer official? Subtlety is my middle name. ~ 19:44, Dec 25, 2009

Actually, what's the difference between an official scratch and an unofficial one? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  19:48, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

Just give me a straight answer, dammit. The difference is if I actually have to go to pee review and submit the article, and if you get credit for it at Cajek's list. I don't mind it either way, so your choice. ~ 19:50, Dec 25, 2009

OK, you bastard. I'm done waiting for your answer, it's 4.30 am and I have to go to sleep. (I would really like a review, please get back to me.) ~ 20:37, Dec 25, 2009

I'm sorry, other than me posting the original message at the beginning of this section, I thought the rest of this was just joking. Were you asking me for help with something? If you want me to Pee Review an article, let me know which one. As I said, I posted a flurry of those messages because there was a flurry of less-than-substantial Pee Reviews. I didn't read the articles, so honestly don't remember what they were. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  21:17, December 25, 2009 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I thought it was a long, convoluted exercise in dishing out metaphors. Anyway, I often like my articles to sit around for a few months before I get a second review, so if you don't have anything to say it's fine, but anyway the article is here. ~ 05:08, Dec 26, 2009

Ah, of course; I see it now. I think it was the "I know that, I wasn't serious" part that threw me. In any case, now that I know what I was talking about (I hope), yeah, I'd prefer if you want it Pee Reviewed you make an official request and I can come along and officially Pee Review it. Right now I'm 13 PR's away from the magic 50. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:27, December 27, 2009 (UTC)

Aha, nice. But I do have a tendency to see metaphors where there is none. When talking to me, you would have no idea what you've agreed to. Aha. ~ 08:27, Dec 27, 2009

Now I agreed knowing what I'm doing. I hope (Will Pee Review). King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:54, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Now that I have your attention let us get down to:

You should do more with User:Hiatus Hernia/The Abstainer it has promise.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  02:22, December 28, 2009 (UTC)

Thanks for your support, but I'm too lazy. Maybe, eventually, perhaps. Planning to do some artwork but I just know I'll never finish them. ~ 08:33, Dec 28, 2009

An invitation to a prestigious club

Hello Hiatus Hernia, pleasing alliteration aside, I would like to offer you the chance to live all your dreams and fantasies.

Having seen you complete over 5 in-depth PEE reviews and review at a consistently high standard I have arrived here to offer you an invitation to join us at the rank of Fresh Stain. This grants all sorts of privileges, such as becoming eligible for Reviewer of the Month, which is a real award! You also get a template for your userpage and may be called upon to review at times of severe toilet blockage. What more could you ask for, if you would like to join PEEING then simply place your signature under the Fresh Stains header on the Committee page and add the template to your userpage.

Thanks, and I hope to see you PEEing again in future. --ChiefjusticeDS 23:19, December 29, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah, well, I suggested this to Chiefster, it just happened to be before you actually qualified. And I'd like to see you peeing doing Pee Reviews as a member of the Pee Review Committee too. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  22:44, December 30, 2009 (UTC)

Yeah ok. (Too tired to think of a funny reply.) ~ 13:29, Dec 31, 2009

Legal Pee Review of Godwin's Law's Law

I Pee Reviewed Godwin's Law's Law based on version 4295965 of 07:13, December 25, 2009/ I hope this helps! User:Why do I need to provide this?/sig9 20:26, December 31, 2009 (UTC)

Pee Reviewd/Obnosis

Thanks for the excellent suggestions on obnosis !

I don't have time to hit it immediately with a new critical thought, but I will.

I just wanted to stop in and let you know I can totally appreciate your considerations and the time you put into it. Also, have a look at my new offering: Arizona L!$@ (Meow!)(Contribs) 21:47, 3 January 2010

Thanks. And lol, again with the motivational posters. You could make it your thing. ~ 13:08, Jan 4, 2010

The Templates Are Coming! The Templates Are Coming!

HITLER AND MUSSOLINI INVADED COUNTRIES THANK YOU TEMPLATES INVADE TALK PAGES TEMPLATES ARE LIKE HITLER AND MUSSOLINI A vote "For" an article on VFH is a vote "For" Hitler and Mussolini!!

The sanctity of your talk page is at stake!--    13:31, January 12, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

The doctor will see you now Oh, by the way, before we begin today's session, I'd like to thank you for supporting my recent featured article. Now, tell me about your childhood.--You know what the music means... Our time is up.

Congrats on Colin

Congrats on getting HowTo:Write Colin Meloy Lyrics featured. You done good! Also where ya been? King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  05:51, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

Also I took the liberty of adding you to Order of Uncyclopedia under CUN. It's not required, but feel free to add a flag to your name if you like! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  06:05, January 21, 2010 (UTC)

I don't know. I'm getting depressed because uni is about to start. Writing articles consumes too much of my brainpower, which I have to conserve for uni. ~ 16:17, Jan 24, 2010

:( • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 19:53, Jan 25 2010

Same here.. :( • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 21:47 • Monday, 25-01-2010

Oh dear. It seems creativity is stifled by real life. ~ 06:49, Jan 26, 2010

Thanks-a-mill-on Soma

Dude! Your expertise, time and effort are much appreciated. I already rearranged as per your review, and have used more than 70% of your advice just to start with. Yes, © was (is) there as a joke, because, truth be known, Soma is a myth, and therefore being copyrighted is absurd. If you read any of my other articles you'll see that my humor tends much toward the contradictory and absurd humor. Like, how can something be copyrighted that is a myth? To me, that is absurd. But I also like Jack Bauer jokes, which are quite popular, and Don Martin cartoons, in spite of some Uncyclopedians thinking otherwise. Yes, a WWW search for Soma mostly turned-up this chick, and she's for real (plus it's not vulgar), she's there because of that (as explained in text). And concerning the Wikipedia version it's really not written by a Vedantist nor Indologist, because, in fact, it is meta-physical, and has no place in this world, ever. It's just imagined to be a psychedelic, and thus the absurd list of material ingredients. I'm really trying more for a goof-ball dope article, and trying to get away from the Vedic sense as presented in Wiki. I'm an editor for Wikipedia since I found my band, The Misunderstood was already in there, so the last thing I want in Uncyclopedia is another stone-cold Wikipedia article *grin*. Like, here is an example of my stone-cold Wiki-work http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Navaratna (in which I am unable to express my true feeling in order to remain NPOV). I'm here for some laughs!

I'm still going over your review and changing things step by step, 70% of which I did immediately. I have a mind to only (further) shorten the psychedelic list, but dump some entire sections completely (which were left over from the original writers article, and I tried to keep them in to please whoever it was that got huffed). I would appreciate your taking another look once I get it done.

As for VFH, I just toss stuff out there to get a rise. For example, although I'm not racist (being married to a foreigner and being an expat who spent more than "one night in Bangkok" - which might make a hard man humble, but three fucking nights makes a humble man hard), I wrote an absurd article BNA that really caused all hell to break loose. It was a freakin' riot! Because the feature pages are all very conservative, and half the voters are anti-absurd, so I'll probably never get a feature if I stick to my personal tastes in humor, which are much more radical, like the Coyote that chewed off three of it's legs and was STILL caught in the trap. Again, thanks for the solid directions. "I'll be back!"--Funnybony 19:12, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

I done did a lot

Many thanks in form of changes. What's the fun of giving advice if it's ignored. The Hindi text I actually composed in Hindi then ran through Google translator, and got THAT cocked-eyed literal translation, and in order to make it appear to be a Google translation (rather than scholastic) so I think it looked more funny and used it. Again I ran the Hindu through to English and get the same translation. That's because of the way Asian languages are kinda backwards in composition when compared to English, and stupid is often funny. I'm not going for VFH on this one. But it's LOADS better since your review... and still at it. Please take a look in a couple more days. Note: I'm a bit shy making fun of the Sanskrit Vedic texts (being a Vaishnava Hindu) so I try to steer clear of that and rather make it up. Thanks again--Funnybony 19:47, January 26, 2010 (UTC)

I didn't mean make fun as in "The Vedic texts are silly", I mean make fun of the style (of translation), as in, make up Vedic-sounding lines (in English). ~ 06:47, Jan 27, 2010

Oh, no misunderstanding. Sorry 'bout daat. What I'm doing with the translation is making into pidgin English as spoken according to the make-up of Hindi. So it sounds stupid, rather than expert who is trying to adjust the Hindi to fit English style. Like, Yoda's mother-tongue is Hindi, see?

Dude, I made huge changes according to your review. Very very helpful. Not FA material, but at least it suits me and my kind. Thanks a mil.--Funnybony 07:17, January 27, 2010 (UTC)

Womp Rat

Thanks for the Pee. It is always helpful. I'll try to think of more jokes. I thought the point that Luke never misses is made in his quote about, "I used to bull's eye womp rats back home" - so HE must have seen one (even though we never do). I also gave a link to more detailed info on a site dedicated to star wars BS. If you can think of any way to improve the article please do so too. Thanks again--Funnybony 12:57, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

Well you know when people write quotes I assume it's made up. Thanks for tolerating my reviews. ~ 17:15, Jan 30, 2010

You're a dental student

Heheheheheheh, enjoy learning how to inject each other in the mouth. What uni do you go to? Sequence 14:01, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

University of Western Australia. Planning to do some stalking? ~ 15:32, Jan 30, 2010

Nah, just wondering if you were going to the University of Sydney. If you were you might have been lectured by my mum (who's a dentist and has told me about when she has to teach the second years how to inject anesthesia into one another). Sequence 16:36, January 30, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, phew. I never told anybody in real life that I edit Uncyclopedia, mostly from the shame. I'd like to keep it that way. ~ 17:12, Jan 30, 2010

Thanks for your support, HH

User:Why do I need to provide this?/UotM Thanks King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  23:12, February 1, 2010 (UTC)

I come here

To explain:

• Ski jump note consists of note for style (judges) and note for length. If Boklov jumped much much further than his opponents, then judges couldn't do much to prevent his win :)

• Inrun and outrun (that are terms from wikipedia) inrun = there is ski jumper before take-off, outrun = he lands on outrun.

• 0.02 = boundary of the time in which ski jumper should make a take-off. Otherwise the jump is too early or too late (like long jump and this white shit they can't step on).

• Judges want to get jumpers hurt. YE, that's the point. Recently, they let Schlierenzauer jump in great wind conditions from highly set start-log and he jumped further than it's possible to land safely and he nearly broke his leg :) and they let ski jumpers jump in really bad wind conditions and they may get hurt (as you seen at video. most of those crashes were due to wind)

• nordic combined skiing = "different" sport consisiting of ski jumping and cross-country skiing. Check wikipedia :)

• Józef Chełmoński is one of the unimportant not known Polish painters :)

• My spelling comes mostly from "fast fingers habit, inperceptivity and laziness" :) Grammar from my laziness (I'm lazy for learning languages... and recently I took up Japanese :P

And THANK YOU for your great effort of reviewing my article which was written in so broken English :P I liked your remarks.

Moreover, I'd like to ask if you would want to help me creating this article. Could you change something in it by yourself? Change or add something you find appropriate? I don't want to make you a slave :) but I liked jokes you wrote in your review and I think you can write something funny :)

CHEERS! Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 21:00, February 4, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks, I did check Wikipedia on those terms, but I wouldn't have understood them without checking Wikipedia, so it's inconvenient for lazy people who just want to read your article I guess. Work with you, maybe. But no guarantees because I'm lazy. I might also catch the ski jumping this winter olympics but I might not, again due to the laziness. ~ 05:24, Feb 5, 2010

So think about it and let me know what your decision is ;). Oh, and in case you will ever be watching ski jumping - You are supposed to support Adam Małysz and to hate Gregor Schlierenzauer and Thomas Morgenstern. Decision about supporting or not supporting other ski jumpers belongs to you. ;D Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 11:38, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Then go go and finish your article. Thanks for info about Bogataj but I've already used him in the article. I've put him in the rules section "you may not crash in more spectacular way than Vinko Bogataj "The Agony of Defeat" man. But I might have emphasized it a bit more. Cheers :) Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 15:57, February 5, 2010 (UTC)

Oh sorry I didn't see that lol. Like all the reviews I did I wasn't paying attention when I did them. ~ 16:07, Feb 5, 2010

For the record...

I've never gotten a Golden Shower either. And I've been reviewing since before PEEING started. So don't feel bad! :D • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 12:58, Feb 8 2010

No way! If I'm qualified to give out golden showers I'll give one to you if you happen to review my articles, which by the way are never going to get finished. ~ 13:11, Feb 8, 2010

And if you do, I'll probably never finish the review! I feel bad for Iwillkillyou333; I still haven't reviewed his article... D: • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 13:18, Feb 8 2010

You know Necro, what amazes me is that you're an old timer and all, but you don't talk like one, compared to some. When I was a noob (still am) I thought that you would be about as old as Guildy uncyc-age-wise. I don't know, I just found this really cool. ~ 14:19, Feb 8, 2010

Well, that's only because I'm still an idiot. ;) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 14:22, Feb 8 2010

Well, you don't lord over less-abled users and talk like you have authority, or end every single one of your edits with a very annoying "Happy editing!". This makes you really cool in my book. (Ok, in retrospect, I did't mean to offend anyone, you're all cool too, but "Happy editing!" is still annoying.) ~ 14:36, Feb 8, 2010

WE LOVE YOU NECRO! Also, this isn't my talk page ~ 14:38, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Wow, I thought that the only people watching my talk page are Why? and Necro to some extent. I was actually thinking about you and Chief when I made that comment of Necro not sounding like an old-timer. ~ 14:46, Feb 8, 2010(shit. I didn't mean that. In retro retrospect I love you all equally. Please don't ban me.)

And now to dispel any myths about how amazing I am. There have been plenty of times where I've felt like trashing some poor n00b for doing something face-smashingly stupid. In fact, Why called me on it pretty recently. It takes at least a full minute of me remembering what I was like in my early months for me to calm down. Happy editing! :-D • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 15:06, Feb 8 2010

One last addendum... Most of the other "old-timers" from "my era" are admins. They do have to deal with a ton of garbage daily, and it's bound to have a small effect on a user's attitude. Me, I've got no responsibilities other than occasionally writing a funny article and maybe a pee review. Sorry, IWKY333! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 15:10, Feb 8 2010

One last one last addendendum... Miss Hernia your latest post has brightened my day immensely (and I don't think Chief will mind too much :)) • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 15:50, Feb 8 2010

Thanks but please don't call me Miss Hernia anymore, it sounds really bad. I hate my username now and I really want to change it. I mean, what was I thinking three months ago? Anyway, happy editing! ~ 15:55, Feb 8, 2010

Very well, you shall be Miss Scarlet and Rhett Butler can just go die. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Monday, 16:02, Feb 8 2010

I'm still trying to figure out if I was complimented or insulted :). BTW, you can change your username via sannse. Even though I think it's an excellent name. ~ 16:14, February 8, 2010 (UTC)

Nah, don't wanna bother the lady. Plus, there's no particular username that I identify with that I want to use for the rest of my uncyc-life. ~ 16:46, Feb 8, 2010

But who else are we gonna call Sheila? Oh, right... • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 07:36, Feb 9 2010

Sheila, that made me lol. ~ 08:58, Feb 9, 2010

I need to remind everyone now to click the button directly to the left of the plus (+) symbol, type in what you wish to put on the page, and do it happily. —Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 08:39, February 9, 2010 (UTC)

iPad Thanks

I see you voted for my new iPad Many thanks.

Thanks for voting on my first featured article! --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 19:39 EST 14 Feb, 2010

Thanks

Thanks for the review. I can see what your saying and I agree. By the way, the Velociraptors were suppose to appear at the end where David came back to life only to walk in the tall grass again and gets eaten by the raptors, but got deleted when Zana Dark was fixing the artilce up. Anyways thanks again.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 01:48, February 16, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah... I'm not sure about recurring velociraptors either... I don't think I know how to make random humour good. ~ 06:07, Feb 16, 2010

Hey

Well, feel free to rape the article in my userspace becuase I can just make "undo" or copy older version from history pages and this way after moving the article to main space YOU will have editions in history and it will be well-known that you participated in the project ;). But if you are not selfish or whatever it could be called, then you can make your own copy then you will simply copy those parts I will find better (I belive most of them will be better :P). But be sure I'm open to everything and I like every kind of help, so don't worry and do your job. Cheers and thanks for help. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 22:12, February 20, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks!

Matfen thanks you for your vote! His article could not have been featured without you...

--Matfen 11:37, February 21, 2010 (UTC)

Re:

If you are able to keep the quaint language, then we maybe should stick to it. But if you are not, then maybe rewrite, I'm not sure. You are a native and I think you should decide what would you like more. :) Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 11:07, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

I like both. I don't know Polish or German or whatever the ski jumpers speak so I don't think I'll be able to keep the "correct" quaint language. ~ 12:01, Feb 23, 2010

Well, interviewed ski jumpers never show any problems with communicating in English with the sole exception of Harri Olli. :P And tbh my "quaint" language is more about my bad English than usage of it for purpose :D. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 20:12, February 23, 2010 (UTC)

Hey. Are you going to continue your work at the Ski jumping? Because it's been unedited for several days? If you are bored with this, then give me a shout.

Please, don't feel offended by the fact I hasten you this way ;). I believe you had simply no time but I'm also a bit bored so I've written this. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 12:20, March 6, 2010 (UTC)

No time and no spirit. I write even slower with my own articles, as you can see I haven't written a new one in many, many months, and I'm not exactly on my summer vacation anymore. My work in progress list is were articles go to die. Sorry, but I'll pick it up whenever. ~ 16:51, Mar 6, 2010

HoS

It's not actually something that anyone compiles or moderates as such. It's simply if someone has gotten enough to be placed on there then they have a choice to add themselves. I never added myself on there initially because I wasn't aware that it was there until I had a few FAs under my belt. Thought you might like to know, as nobody has excluded Monika as such - just that he's/she's never added himself/herself. Nominally Humane! some time 10:31, 27/02/2010

Okay, then. I wonder if a day will come when I can add myself to that list. ~ 18:02, Feb 27, 2010

Just keep writing, and working on your style. I had written significantly more than 3 articles before I had 3 featureable, and most of those features were reviewed and rewritten at least once, and in at least one case there was 3 separate reviews, and lots of rewrites. Nominally Humane! some time 19:38, 27/02/2010

Congratulations

	Reviewer of the Month February 2010

Well deserved, keep up the good work. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 08:08, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

Well, like a lot of Uncyclopedians I have doubts about whether I deserve awards or not, but instead of making a big speech about it I just kept quiet and it has all been playing out according to my plan. *insert evil laugh* ~ 08:16, Mar 1, 2010

Say, my illegitimate adoptee won RotM! Congrats! King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  20:55, March 1, 2010 (UTC)

You weren't really my adoptee, of course, but I'll claim credit anyway.

And as my illegitimate father you did not even vote for me. Alas, hast thou forsaken me? ~ 08:06, Mar 2, 2010

I don't think I voted for anybody; I really intended to at the end of the month. I was literally on computer working on Uncyclopedia when I was hit with a sudden dizzy spell that sent me to the bathroom, the floor, then finally to bed. Then I had to work back-to-back shifts, and then like an idiot I thought Monday was the last day of February instead of Sunday. So I never got to voting for RotM or a couple other things, nor did I do the second Pee Review I intended to do in February. Sorry about that. King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  04:42, March 4, 2010 (UTC)

"Nice award" Fadda Murphy send his best wishes

Congrats. Well deserved. And I am awed at the range you can reach standing up. On Mortal Sin, Black Flamingo finished his review, and it seems quite helpful although I haven't started to implement it yet. Some good ideas (although I like all the photos, maybe a tweek on the Ming caption). Please have a look if you have a minute. And your data on the Popes leads to some interesting websites and articles, will scrounge around in there as well. The entire topic rests on a structure built up over thousands of years and only recently starting to be exposed, although the Martin Luther timeline, of course, put many offenses and defenses into motion which continue in the present. Could go on many words and hours on this topic. More soon, ~   :37 4.3.year of da Lord mmx

If only my real life was going this well. If Uncyc pays me I could be a professional reviewer, surely. ~ 11:13, Mar 4, 2010

I put Fadda Murphy up for VFH. Thanks for your comments, helpful and appreciated. I added Luther and got rid of the Godfadda III movie, and on the popes getting whacked, I'll find a place for that. Since the murders are not directly related to Mortal Sin, like Luther's actions were, I didn't know how to work that into the topic. Having the page focused on Mortal sin and not the overall mafia influence on "da church", which is implied throughout, centers the subject to the fadda's presentation and explanation of his churches biggest fundraising technique. It's good meeting you further, and thanks. Please let me know if I can take a look over something you have stirring. Aleister in Chains 14:17 Roma time 7.3.

Since you asked, look at my User:Hiatus Hernia/Unbooks:The Parent. Tell me if it's bad/good and if I should continue in that direction, because I'm having a bit of self-doubt. I'll vote for your article in a while. ~ 10:25, Mar 8, 2010

Hi, and I'll be glad to read your page later today. Thanks for pointing it out. And thanks for the vote, I wasn't writing to whore the article, but to thank you for your help on it. Its talk page can be one depository for data on the Catholic-Mafia connections, and I still want to read all the references you left there. More soon, Al 13:16 same day

A bit conflicted, that one, my vote. I don't know if it's just me or it feels like something's missing. I am also unable to find most articles that I've looked at for too long funny, and that includes all of my own articles (some might say they were never funny in the first place), so it's probably just me. My initial enjoyment of your article stems from the concept and the weird manner of speech, so I'm drawing on that initial feeling I had a few days ago to support my vote. By the way, I remembered that I laughed out loud at "Holocaust? Forgetaboutit!" because it sounds like Holocaust denial, and was disappointed when you turned it into "holycost". ~ 16:04, Mar 8, 2010

Hi, thanks, hopefully your first impression will be others as well. And if you can think of what's missing, please, let's put that in. The harder hitting stuff maybe. I'll put in "holocaust", it was actually holycost all along and you read it the other way. But I'll go put that in, and then out for 7 or 8 hours. Back then, Al. a few minutes later

Really...? This type of situation has been happening to me more than it should. ~ 16:25, Mar 8, 2010

You may be around too much "laughing gas" at work, that's one of the worse drugs in mine and others opinions. But to put on my serious hat for a bit, I love the fact that our brain takes about half a second to process all of the data coming into the senses to make a picture of it that we then "see hear feel etc." in the brain. A holygraph(holy again!) So most often we see just a very tiny, extremely tiny, portion of the total sensory bytes that the brain is working with. And the brain will take something a bit out of place and make it "familiar". My personal favorite was when I once saw a snake on the ground as I was walking, and it moved snakelike for at least half a second, no, maybe a quarter of a second, before I realized it was a stick and my brain then rebooted it into its "real" image as a stick. Have to go, I look forward to seeing your story later. Al, a few minutes later

Left a short note on the talk page of Parents, and will get back to it. An interesting undertaking. Al 1:27 9.3.mmx

I've realized what a large topic Parents, or Parenthood, is, and what a task it is to define it in one, or a dozen!, articles. Nice work. Al de Chain' 13:45 10 3

Thanks for the pee

Thanks for the pee of Mr. Keating. Yeah, I kind of had the feeling it wasn't so good, that was basically a clean-up tagged page that I decided to re-write. While what I did is better, I'm still not very satisfied with it, I just wanted to see if my suspicions were correct by getting an opinion. I'll either start over again or just nominate the article for deletion since the major project I'm working on right now is User:skinfan13/John Adams, haven't decided yet. at any rate, thanks again --Sir Skinfan13 Talk {< CUN RotM FBotM VFH ΥΣΣ Maj. SK >} 15:11 EST 7 Mar, 2010

Well, I won't call it VFD, but it's a bit mediocre as it is. ~ 09:15, Mar 8, 2010

I know how you feel.

A big reason I don't write many articles is because I'm embarassed by my writing. I can barely stomach looking at my essays from school, and I always get A's on those. It's just how I am, I guess.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 20:20, March 11, 2010 (UTC)

So do I. Honestly. I look at a few things I have done and cringe. But the truth is that I write for the sake of getting stuff out of my head and onto paper, and if it can be done in a way that someone else can enjoy it, all that much better. But never, ever second guess yourself. Write it, and let someone else review it, rewrite it if you need to. But most importantly, share it with the community. And keep writing! Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 21:01, Mar 11 2010 UTC

O.O Thanks for your concern guys. I think I'm just on this perpetual writer's block, hopefully I'll recover when I get a vacation in the distant future, or not. ~ 04:37, Mar 12, 2010

HALP! I needz c0llabz0rz!!!1!oneone!1

This. I believe you're familiar with the subject. • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 09:30 • Friday, 12-03-2010

Aww, did Guildy dump you? Anyway, I'm not really familiar with the subject, I'm still on my writer's block of epic proportions, and you can see what happened to my collab with Ptok which is not going that great. ~ 09:59, Mar 12, 2010

Naw, not guildy. Mordillo. Also, don't worry, writer blocks tend to go in a blink of an eye. • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 10:27 • Friday, 12-03-2010

Not mine. =) ~ 11:16, Mar 12, 2010

Pleeease? • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 11:26 • Friday, 12-03-2010

Nah I don't wanna let another editor down. I can, however, give demeaning criticisms really meant to boost my own self-esteem but disguised as "constructive" and "helpful", which is apparently fooling everybody as evidenced by my most recent award. ~ 12:56, Mar 12, 2010

Fine, I'll just go look for somebody else to kiss their sweet ass. • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 13:37 • Friday, 12-03-2010

Psst, Hiatus, is Fredd gone? Good. Let's go back to working on our collab of "Citizen Kane, The Remake". He'll never know that our writer's blocks are just deceptions to hide our real-time real-life fast track to the Nobel Prize for Literature. Aleister in Chains 13:41 12 3 mmx

Yo, lady, wannted to thank ya for all da help and ideas to get me over dere on da front page. Ya vote didn't hurt either, tell ya dat. Just ease up on da talk about da popes, will ya, some of dem are pretty good eggs, and dey don't give us any trouble anymore after dat JohnPaul I guy gave us lip. Ok, I'm outta here. Fadda Murphy and his lackey secretary Al De'chain

Yes, our work together will be likened to "Paradise Lost" meets "The Kite Runner", and it will not only win the Nobel Prize, but beat Twilight in the New York Times Bestseller's list, which would be a first for any Nobel Prize-winning book. Anyway, mushi, if I may say so, I think the current format is not working for you. I think that a format more similar to MonsterQuest would work better than a format similar to Interview with a taxi driver. I have also seen your multiple versions and have never gotten a single one of them, because I think I don't really know what the concept is, other than "hey, I can make the title really long and I'll just throw together something to fill the spaces after that". ~ 14:08, Mar 12, 2010

Ok, that might be a bit harsh... blame my boost-needing ego and my urge to give unsolicited article advice. ~ 14:10, Mar 12, 2010

Ha, no problem at all, I don't mind constructive critisism, no matter how harsh it is... So anyway, are you saying that I should change the format to something like "Have you ever wondered how that happened? Wonder no more, it's the Papyrus." • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 14:53 • Friday, 12-03-2010

I don't know what you mean. Was thinking of those Egyptology documentaries that I used to watch, like who killed King Tut or something. ~ 15:47, Mar 12, 2010

Exactly. That's why I need you to help me out. Also, nobody killed Tut, he died from malaria and internal haemorrhage, according to a group of Egyptian and German doctors who examined his mummy last month...• FreddAin't Dedd • • • 16:23 • Friday, 12-03-2010

I know. Sometime ago I was watching this dated documentary about who killed Tut, and it went through all the possible theories in a cheesy way, trying to create suspense and all that, only at the end it put up a disclaimer that Tut was killed by knee injury (that was some time ago). So that was an hour of my life wasted. ~ 16:28, Mar 12, 2010

So, are you gonna collab? *cocks the gun* • FreddAin't Dedd • • • 16:31 • Friday, 12-03-2010

Never. You'll have to kill me first. ~ 16:35, Mar 12, 2010

Thanks!

Matfen thanks you for your vote! His article could not have been featured without you...

But I must implore you to keep a leash on that schoolgirl crush of yours. ;) --Matfen 11:35, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

It's more like an insatiable sex drive. (What are you actually talking about?) ~ 12:00, Mar 15, 2010

We both know you didn't vote for my article because it was any good. --Matfen 12:04, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

I'll bring the candles. Al

Hey you two, get a room. But keep the door open so we can watch, and the lights on so the video turns out alright. Al de'chain 12:14 15 3 mmx

Well, I actually have a really good explanation as to why I've consistently voted for all of your articles since I've been here, as opposed to many other more accomplished editors whose articles I sometimes miss out on voting for, but who am I to ruin the threesome that's about to take place? ~ 12:22, Mar 15, 2010

Such a nice girl. My morals prohibit me from taking this sexual harrassment any further. Perhaps you should leave me and Aleister to it. Congrats on finally getting the elusive golden shower BTW. --Matfen 12:33, March 15, 2010 (UTC)

Would both of you like to join Skinfan's fraternity? Then we can break the glass ceiling and cohabitate in one of our frat rooms. Seriously, come and join, don't let only "brothers" have all the fun. Its main purpose is to collab on a monthly page from the 50 most requested list, and to personally write an article from that list every few months. The rest of the time can be spent smoking grass up on the roof. And saw your note down below, I myself don't have a watchlist outside of the "recent changes" off of my user page (all the watch buttons are on, so my watchlist contains a link to every page I've edited). I do watch recent changes in navigation, and when a gathering of a few people occurs I'll usually look in. Never know what you're missing (the Gay Jesus talk page for example, that was a fun few days) Al 17:46 15 3 mmx

I considered it but I don't think I'll be able to write, you know, being on my writer's block and all. ~ 08:14, Mar 16, 2010

Hey Al, on the talk page of Gay Jesus, was MO serious? I think not, it's hard to tell and a bit disconcerting, but I really don't believe that someone who wrote the stuff that MO wrote would miss the point of that page. ~ 11:10, Mar 17, 2010

I count 65 words in the those two posts alone. What writer's block? Do that 10 more times and you've got 650 words! Then you can join the frat, which really doesn't have a whole lot of requirements and if they try to depledge you if your don't contribute then we can change the locks on the door when everyone's out. You read talk Gay Jesus, they shouold put it up on pee review. No, mo wasn't serious, he was taking the guy for a ride and I think he caught on after awhile. There's a little more at Peacebyjesus talk page between him and DrStrange, and then he left, ascending, no doubt, into heaven. Food fight! Al de'chain 11:34 17 3

What mo said sounded like something Puppy would write in an article, instead of his usual non-sequitors. (I'll keep thinking about the frat, ok?)~ 12:12, Mar 17, 2010

24 more words, and one of them a book-learnin' word. Glory to St. Patty on his day-of-days, thee block has fallen away. Al, few minutes later

Congrats

Insert golden shower award here.

Rejoice, Hiatus Hernia! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

And well deserved. An extremely well thought out and considered review, and something that will actually keep me thinking for a while before I get back into it. Nominally Humane! some time Monday, 12:00, Mar 15 2010 UTC

I have no choice but to say, "Dude, what the hell??". Is this to make sure that I never get a real golden shower? ~ 12:06, Mar 15, 2010

Template fix, also thought I'd drop by and say hello to a user who joined while I was away and then dared make something of himself. You should be glad I came down here; I don't often assosiate with the riff-raff. :)    Orian57    Talk   12:08 15 March 2010

Wow, thanks. A new watcher of my talkpage! ~ 12:23, Mar 15, 2010

Thanks for the VFS vote

It really is appreciated. Some may say it's a little early to say it's over for me, but I can see the future. :P I'm glad you think I'd make a good admin! Talk to you later, then! • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} Tuesday, 10:56, Mar 16 2010

Thanks

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

And no, I will never, ever change these templates up at all, just in case you were wondering.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 22:49, March 19, 2010 (UTC)

---

Hey man

Are you alive? I come here to ask you about your further work at OUR article about ski jumping. As you probably know, I've been forced to put it on mainspace due to the VFD of old article about ski jumping and I wanted to reserve the title. Sir Ptok-Bentoniczny^{Pisz tutaj} • KUN 13:34, March 23, 2010 (UTC)

Barely alive. Dental school is crushing my soul day after day. I think I will have an easter break the week after next week so if I am to pick things up, that's when I'll do it. You know about me and my work ethic. If it doesn't concern marks it'll probably never get done. But how are you liking the changes so far? What have you decided to include and to leave out? And it is probably in your best interest to complain to Aleister too because he's a better writer and much more likely to write your article for you. ~ 12:47, Mar 24, 2010

I kept all your changes. They didn't break my concept and made arctile to look better and increased readability. not logged Ptokh

Thank you

Thanks for your vote on In-A-Gadda-Da-Vida. Since three of us get credit for it (PF4Eva and Funnybony) I won't write a funny thanks. Appreciated. Googled the song and our page is the 12th listing on google, that's always fun. --- Other stuff. Where have you gone, Josephine DiMaggio, uncy nation turns it lonely eyes to you, woo woo woo. 'nuff of that like above (and the part about me writing Ptok's article for him, yikes, where's my shoes 'cause I'm outtttaaaa here), your infamous writer's block (some of us have started up a betting pool on when you will declare that over, I've got a good bet in). Good luck in school, are you having exams coming up or just getting the break? Thanks again, Al in hiding from Ptok 18:18 25 3 mmx

I have a bunch of mid-semester tests, and my hours in uni are quite long so when I have free time I'd rather spend them on mindless activities than brainpower-consuming ones. ~ 09:51, Mar 26, 2010

Milton

Thanks a bunch for the review.

Rejoice, Hiatus Hernia! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

I'll get to work revising as soon as I can. Thanks. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 14:31, March 27, 2010 (UTC)

Pee review

Hi. I know you aren't very busy, and can work on your schoolwork and take your exams with one hand tied behind your back, just under that part you can't itch. So would you do me a favor (pretty please, pretty please with diamonds and champagne on top) and consider pee reviewing "Sideboob"? Reason I'm asking is that I would like a woman's perspective of the page. It sounds racy, but I really enjoyed the writing. The bouncy video is safe for work, I checked with Mordillo, so the page is fine for VFH if it passes muster. Thanks, and in seriousness, if you are too busy that's totally understandable. Appreciated, Al en'chainy 15:34 29 3 mmx

Oh, yeah, like I have nothing better to do on the day before my test than to lurk around Uncyclopedia procrastinating, and happened to get your message shortly after it was posted. I've read your article, and don't think I can pee review it because I have no idea what to say, and seeing that Uncyclopedia's main users are supposedly obese male nerds your article will do just fine. I can see that it's very well-written, but when I was reading it I didn't feel like I was part of your target audience. You know, it might just be my low self-esteem, but I felt a bit offended because it somehow made me arrive at the conclusion that nobody would ever want to see my side boob (being an obese, female nerd and all). Anyway, I don't think other women will react like me because I'm a bit weird, but I should seriously get back to studying. No, seriously. ~ 16:00, Mar 29, 2010

Your sideboob is likely very nice. Good luck on the test tomorrow, all my fingers crossed. And that's just why I wanted your opinion, a woman writer, and not "just" a woman. I was hoping you could tell me what to add to or change something you might have disliked. But the page is written for adult readers even if the photos are for the men (and chapstick-lesbians). Thanks, and best of test results again. Never underestimate the value of a good cheat sheet. Al 18:00 29 3 mmx

You're too kind, I'm more like a writer-wannabe. And just got back from that test and it was miserable. Miserable, I tell you. Anyway, good luck in your VFH ventures and if it's still in queue by this weekend I'll take a look at it again and possibly review it. ~ 08:22, Mar 30, 2010

Hi, and hopefully you've "recovered" from the test and are going to enjoy a good weekend. Petgr. pee-reviewed the Sideboob page, and I think I've removed most of the objectional material (the things I was uncomfortable in keeping in). I'm starting a brief five-day vacation tomorrow, that will be fun, and will get back in touch once I am computerized again. Al en'chainy 2:55 2 4 mmx

HTBAFANJACF

Dude! The truth be known. I sporked HTBFANJS and made my OWN: How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak. Hope you "get" it! Dude! The truth be known. I sporked HTBFANJS and made my OWN: How to be absurdly funny and not just a content freak. Hope you "get" it! Cheers--Funnybony    04:43, Mar 25

I like that article (lol), because I can laugh at myself, but a handful of "content-free" articles do get featured, such as some of Cajek's, and some of Hyperbole's what I call "Adventures in Daily Life" articles (I don't appreciate your reheating of my lasagne or some such thing), and a handful of other ones that you have to look for, and my favourite one is probably Samuel L. Vacuum. I'm also in the process of giving a particularly harsh review on an article full of content, and taking a little break. Still, congrats on your first half-feature, no hard feelings, and boy, do I feel weird butting into your talkpage MrN. ~ 15:04, Mar 26, 2010

Oh! Dear! THAT!? Why that has been totally revamped and Al nomed it on his own, without any sexual favors. But maybe too late once a feeding starts. But it's much better, well, more politically correct and polite. Take another look if you have a chance, at least the new intro gets off to a much more polite start. Cheers!--Funnybony    01:03, Mar 31

Hey you!

Stop being such a good reviewer this instant. You're making everyone else look bad.—Sir ¬_¬ | Banter HOMOPHOBE!!! NOTM 19:58, April 2, 2010 (UTC)

Yessss, my plan is working..... ~ 04:21, Apr 3, 2010

HitBm review

Thank you for your charming review - it is well balanced between searing and sensitivity. I find you raise many a good point (especially with the prose mistakes, one problem I have with writing lengthy articles or essays is that having to reread it so constantly soon makes it the worst thing in the world for me). I understand your point with the I's and the you's; it is a feature I believe I can explain, yet scarred by guilt - after the first paragraph of the introduction (of which attempts to posit to the reader, should s/he be ignorant of homosexual warboys, that there are places in the world who permit homosexuality in the forces), the following paragraph entrées with:

"But we're British - thank god. This sort of thing might be tolerated by the French, and good for them, but the stiff upper lip is no party for such heinous sexual acts."

Note the first segment - But we're British - that, to me, is an instant invention for personality and first-personableness. We're British seems to imply that the narrator is British, and the audience is British (bear with me here), perhaps British people, the only people capable of applying to a British military, is the intended effect. Hence also the "but they didn't let this interfere with their shooting practice, and neither should you." titbit that erupts later on. Not to mention, the first segment, plus the theocratic blemish, along with the anti-French statement extension, is a genuine (albeit paraphrased) quote from Field Marshall Bernard Montgomery (I would source this, but you mentioned that a slow internet is currently in the works). With some amount of false-nationalistic vigour, I hope this clears up the issue. I despise this establishment.

The personality itself was inspired by a recent BBC comedy named Bellamy's People (of all the recent comedies accentuated on "the people of Britain", Bellamy's People is by far the best. It is realistic, anti-right wing, very well-rounded and diverse, literally diverse). In this show, there is a part that sort of criticises the British military: two commanding officers, a major and a general, both aged men one of whom makes gaffes regarding the British army, of which the modern media likes to splash on front pages in this country ("Army permits violent criminals", "RAF bomb wrong target - civilians killed", also that Prince Harry "is a racist" story mentioned in the article), whilst the other man picks his colleague up with something like: "Of course, we will train any man, regardless of his beliefs, in the modern army". It was the best inflection I could think of in this article. Also, if you have seen Graham Chapman's army roles in Monty Python's Flying Circus, you might see why I wanted to be as subtle as possible with introducing the narrator. I'm not even sure what rank he is specifically - they're all the same.

Problems with the prose - my next activity. I believe I excused myself in some lonely bracket'd sentiment above. You have improved my writing skill by highlighting these mistakes.

E.M. Forster is superb, I have read A Passage to India - it appeals to an Atlee person myself - I can only defend such accusations for lack of Forster's inclusion with thus: T.E. Lawrence dictated many a letter to Forster, you could assume as much you need with this lone fact. There are many famous homosexuals in this land, you are right, but I could not deter myself too much from the subject at hand.

Yes, this culture does have a firm grip on comedy.

Lastly, you were admirable enough to pass on the idea of VFH being a worthy hostel for this article to spend it's 15 minutes in. You might understand my plan to make vanity a less evident tag in my lifestyle - I have all the confidence in the world that all I write is VFH-able - but would rather detach myself from such openness. Thank you once more for your time. --nldr 17:07, April 3, 2010 (UTC)

Wha...? So does that mean you're not going to nom it? And you're not gonna change anything? And what's with the sudden verbosity? ~ 03:31, Apr 4, 2010

And, I've also heard the "We're British, thank god" quote before, I just couldn't remember who said it, so I think I assumed that it was sort of like a quotation when you used "we" there. This is probably why I found the change in tone in the third paragraph very sudden. ~ 03:40, Apr 4, 2010

I just changed some parts in the article, as to preach to your keen eyesight over the prose problems. I am sure it is worthy of being nominated - it's just that I have the confidence that someone else would do the proceedings without me giving the impression that all I want is more articles featured. :) (ie. I'm too lazy/pseudo-arrogant to do it myself). --nldr 10:36, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

Pseudo-arrogant indeed. I'm just a glorified proofreader now aren't I? (I'm ok with it, I'll vote for your article if it gets nommed, but I'm not going to fall for your reverse-whoring, you reverse-whore!) ~ 15:10, Apr 4, 2010

(On the contrary, I believe you're the reverse-nominator here, the fascists came to power in Germany because the intellectuals did nothing.) --nldr 15:46, April 4, 2010 (UTC)

n00b kweshin

Answer (hopefully) is here. Hugs from Almost-your-Daddy King of the Internet Alden Loveshade??? (royal court)  03:28, April 8, 2010 (UTC)

Hi

Hello, I see you're online, doing edits to Emo Girl (a very good article I've read a couple of times, maybe I'll nom it if it's never gone up. Did you catch all/most of the typos?). Did you get the results of your exam back as yet? Pass, fail, indifferent? I've get some sick from a trip to Vegas last week and have been lying around all weekend, so have done some uncy time (mainly polishing up Giant Jew Band, opinion always loved if you have a few minutes) and watching the Masters Golf tournament and some tv I've saved up on tape. La la la. Lying around. What's your weekend like? Al sans chains lying around 12:54 11 4 mmx

Yep. No. Blergh. Was planning to do some studying but didn't, decided to review something because the list was so long. How come nobody is reviewing lately? Have you thought about helping out? ~ 13:48, Apr 11, 2010

Yeah, help out, or else... Someone who has not done a review for a month now 13:52, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Well, you can be excused. You've done more reviews than I ever would in a lifetime. ~ 14:01, Apr 11, 2010

I did an edit sweep too and nommed Emo Girl. I really like that page. Haven't done a pee review yet, because I've always had a hard time reviewing someone else's work (you see what I did when you asked me to review your Parenting page, just talked about length without any real advice). I can point out more now, having gone through the process several times, so maybe I'll try it. Haven't even opened the pee review template up, what occurs there, does the template roll out next to the article or do you have to print the article and use the template by itself? Al ignorant of HowTo:Pee Review 14:22 11 4 mmx

Just head on over to the queue, find an article you think needs a review and click on the big review now button, it couldn't be simpler I mean, I can do it! --ChiefjusticeXBox360 14:25, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Click? Button? Why are you using all these big words with me! Al sans chains few minutes later

You did? You realise that I'm in the middle of reviewing that article? You realise that my general review was "meh, this is decent, but more could be done?" You realise it would make me look like an idiot and blow all my credibility dust to the wind if this article succeeds? HahahaHAHAHA, of course I don't mind, I mean, why would you think I care about things like that? I mean, I'm not that petty.

Anyway, for srs now, to review, you just click on the big REVIEW NOW button, and a table will come up in the edit box. I usually have the article open in another tab. Also, FU edit conflict! ~ 14:32, Apr 11, 2010

No, I didn't know you were reviewing it, thought you were editing some misspellings and things. Yikes! More could probably be done, yet I like Iwillkillyou's phrasing. I did take out the Emo Girl Finder 500 section and made some other changes, so maybe look at my edits to see if maybe enough-more was done? Yikes! Al, a few minutes later

Ah, shit, I did not see that. I did recommend he take out that emo finder. Yeah, there was nothing wrong with the phrasing, but to show how dedicated a reviewer I am, I'm listening to My Chemical Romance songs while reviewing his article. I just felt that he could do with inserting more emoness, because the article is pretty mellow compared to MCR's lyrics. ~ 14:47, Apr 11, 2010

Cool, you may become an emo. An emo dentist would be interesting (and an idea for another article!) How I took the page was that it was a "normal" guys' take on an emo girl, and wanting to date her but not really understanding her (and this gets back to dehydration--the Doc at the watercure.com site pretty well proved that all depression is is dehydration, which would take most emo girls out of their element), and not so much of what an emo really is. I didn't like the father's rules language, but didn't change it much. Left Iwillkillyou a note on his page. Yikes! Al en chains 15:03 11 4 mmx

You could see it that way. You can also be all like "to know your enemy, you must be your enemy", or some such thing, which was basically my attitude. I can't be an emo, because I'm already a hipster. (Actually, nah, in real life I act all normal to fit in. There are no emos or hipsters in Perth. Perth has the most boring, mellow kids.) ~ 15:11, Apr 11, 2010

Give this woman a good home and she'll do some of the household chores and can be used as a solar energy panel. Thanks for your vote at Sideboob, appreciated! Al sans chains

We could all go do emo pee reviews. "Your article is cool, like darkness..."--Sir ~HELPME~ ^{Count! Awards! Pee! Help!} 15:12, April 11, 2010 (UTC)

Thy kingdom come, thy will be done, in Perth as it is in London. Al sans chains few minutes more

Also, emo dentist, I had that idea ages ago, when I was a n00b. I just never got around to writing it, because I couldn't get the jokes straight, and I'm not sure if the idea would make sense to normal people who don't know that we get depressed and whine unnecessarily about trivial things. ~ 15:28, Apr 11, 2010

That's what I meant, an article idea for you. You have dental perspectives that we could all enjoy, emo or otherwise. Jeez, an article on dentists laughing at all the people in pain would be fun. Lots of good material for someone who actually knows the "inside information" like you. Dentally, Al, a few minutes later

Why don't you write it? And I'll just come in and correct all the factual information? I'm not that good at writing stuff that normal people are not familiar with, I mean, just look at my latest exploit. I will rewrite it, I swear to God. (Expect it in twenty years time.) ~ 15:44, Apr 11, 2010

Pee reviews, writing articles, yikes, I'll have to escape here without adding work to my schedule! Maybe I'll do a simple pee review, just to test the whiskey. And it looks good for I'llmurderya's page on VFH, so maybe we did ok with the cleanup before I jumped the gun. Al sans chains 14:10 12 4 mmx

Pee needed

Hi Hiatus, now I normally wouldn't bother somebody with this but could you do this review as your next one please. I have asked you as one of our most active reviewers at the moment the main reason I'm asking is that the article currently languishes in a VFH limbo as nobody has looked at it for a week and the author would like to nominate it. I'll ask a couple of other people too, but if you can help I would appreciate it. Cheers. --ChiefjusticeXBox360 20:03, April 13, 2010 (UTC)

Review

Iread the note you left me on my Untunes article,and sorry I havent got to respond to it sooner. Links to songs are as followed

• Jonas Brothers: When You look me In the eyes
• Cannibal Corpse: I will kill you (which is basically what my name is based off of)

--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 03:18, April 14, 2010 (UTC)

Creepy songs

Interesting juxtoposition of songs there: When you look me in the eyes I will kill you. An old Australian ballad, if I remember correctly. Thanks for your triple signed vote on the Giant Jew Band page. That was a surprise nom, I thought he'd trash it in review. A fun page to write, but took quite a few weeks of tinkering. A couple of days ago some IP stumbled in and left a one-line page "Australia's history" and before it could get huffed Msu and myself decorated it. Please have a look, maybe you can give it some better links. Thanks for all, and for your nice words on the nom page. Al sans chains 14:58 17 4 mmx

Heh. I laughed at that. And thank you for writing nice stuff for me to laugh at. ~ 15:14, Apr 17, 2010

Here to serve. I just listened to the I will kill you song. It seems all the same except for a clever intro, then some growling with someone banging noise together for a couple of minutes. And these guys are making money for doing that! They must be laughing every day. Do you have a page or two cooking, the parenting one, how's that going? I'm doing a ghost one and one on an American historical figure, James Bevel. Don't know about you, but I can't work on something (here at least) for too long a stretch and like to jump around. Al, few minutes later

The Giant Jew Band has come to your page to play for you. They thank you for your vote to hoist them up on the front page, and will take any request you have. You rock, Hiatus, so they will now rock for you. Giant Jew! Band! Al des chain 21 4

You work too hard here. Should get a job, that'll teach ya. (By the way, you know where I'm from and what I do, so how about you?) I'm not actually writing anything. I do have a couple of ideas but I can't get beyond the introduction, which are in my word docs. ~ 15:43, Apr 17, 2010

Nah, most the time I'm on I'm either listening to tv, am outside in the sun relaxing, or am doing lots of my things or office things or nothing and coming back to the computer from time to time. I'm a North American and or in the vicinity of North America, that's all I'll say publicly. I know you have that one page which is very good. Things call me away, good writing and reading you. Al, few minutes later

I have 4 completed articles. It's like, pathetic. Yeah, if you want to find out who I am in real life you probably could, so, damn, I should have kept my mouth shut. Good writing and reading you too. ~ 16:00, Apr 17, 2010

Just don't let those cannibal guys from the song or from the page stalk you. If you have one of those email things here, I have one but don't know how it works, and feel like it please write. Al sans chains

Thanks!

FROM THE DESK OF GUILDENSTERNENSTEIN

Thank you for supporting my recently featured article.

I, like, appreciate your support, or something.

—Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 05:13, April 22, 2010 (UTC)

---

Clare GAA

Thanks a million for your review! I know you would find it difficult to understand the majority of the jokes, because i think our humour is completely different, and that goes for countries too. But i have taken your points into consideration and i am very grateful for the help. I know this article is about a very localised area, and as i said i would'nt expect you to get the jokes. I will put in a few explanations in, but i think for such an unknown subject (except for Ireland), there will be a huge amount of explanations needed, which would probably frustrate the people who will understand the concept of the article. I was also hoping you would fix the picture of the dog to get it to fit in Ollie Baker's section. I really appreciate your review. Thanks once again.

Your new intro made it much better, though. ~ 02:33, Apr 23, 2010

Mecca Vice

Hi Hiatus. Thanks for the advice. I took out the CAPS you mentioned. Please let me know if I missed any. My improved writing means you guys are rubbing off (on?). Nothing like good company and advice. This $1 whore hopes you vote for the VFH. Might be my first FA after 115 articles and UnNews. Cheers!--Funnybony    19:12, Apr 26

Uncyclopedia:VFH/Discordianism

I fixed it! Thankies! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 20:50, April 29, 2010 (UTC)

An idea

Why don't we both nom the page, you know the one we both wanted to nom (I'm hiding it from the others who read this, who may want to nom it too). Even though it's a user page, I researched the history and the author did put it on a template with the name used, so I think that's evidence he wants it as a stand alone mainspace article. We could put both our names on the nom, and edit the initial vote between us (would be funny if we were one vote and not two, then if needed later we could separate into two votes but I think when people "read" the page they will feature it). What think you? Al secretive chainy 21:14 29 4 mmx

I'm glad you are hiding User:Unregistered_user from people. I think if people became aware of User:Unregistered_user they'd probably decide to nom it themselves, as User:Unregistered_user is a fantastic article, and User:Unregistered_user should probably be nommed. Although, I have to say if User:Unregistered_user was nommed I'd actually vote against User:Unregistered_user being featured. I wonder if User:Unregistered_user was actually written by User:Sockpuppet of an unregistered user. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 22:19, Apr 29 2010 UTC

Wrong, wrong as the driven snow. I was talking about User:Betty Boop. That's the page that Hiatus, myself, Mordillo, and Chronium want to nom as a team. Please join us in our joint nom. As for the page you found, it is very good. Did you click on the links under the photographs which tell the story? Thanks for pointing out such a wonderful user page, and you should definitely nom it. Aleister in Chains 23:12 29 4

Sorry, did you say something? I was distracted by the swinging nipples. Nominally Humane! some time Thursday, 23:20, Apr 29 2010 UTC

Chief Thereintheskyitsabirditsaplane thanks you for allowing his ghost tribe to frolic free on the main page, where they scared off IP's and noobies all day long! Thanks, appreciated, Al des chain 22:43 30 4

Aren't we all. Well, maybe not Hiatus. Al des chain 23:22 29 4

We should just copy the whole thing onto mainspace, if we could do something like that. I don't really care if I get to nom it or not, so knock yourself out (with the swinging boobies). ~ 02:59, Apr 30, 2010

You apparently can't move it to main space, but he has created a link from template shown in mainspace to user page, which is a no-no. To fix this you'd have to change that link to something in main space, which there isn't anything there yet. However, if somone were to copy the contents of the article into a main space article, that would be fine. It's not like we'd be touching anything that's in user space after all. Nominally Humane! some time Friday, 03:19, Apr 30 2010 UTC

A great idea, scheming and underhanded. I like it! Hiatus, please, pretty please with two nuggets of gold on top, let's both of us nom it at once. I could put our names up under the same connect, and you can go in and change and/or add onto the nom language. But it would be fun, I think anyway, to have a two-person nom which counts as just one vote. Hee hee. More later, Al sans chains 22:46 30 4

I'm always scheming and underhanded, I mean, if I have more free time, I'd write lots of Machiavellian unbooks, not just that horrible half finished one. So is it agreed that you (or I) copy it to mainspace, and somehow nom it together? I don't understand how a 2 person nom works, do we have to nom it at the same time or something? ~ 09:25, May 1, 2010

We can just sign the nom and then the nom comment Hiatus Hernia and Aleister in Chains, and count it as one vote, and then once the comment is on we can both put our sigs on it. But the nom would have to be all one line, I reckon. Al sans chains 8:50 May Day (oh, we can sign it with a normal date, and not use my play dates) MMX

In need of a review

Are you doing any reviews at the moment, cause I need one for an article of mine, that is if you are availible.--DirectorWILLYOU 333Talk IF YOU DARE 04:49, April 30, 2010 (UTC)

Do you mean bat country? I wasn't planning to review this week, and I don't have background knowledge of the topic, so, no. ~ 11:23, Apr 30, 2010

From an earlier discussion

See, I was right. When you said I would win wotm sometime soon I told you that you saying that would be better than actually winning it. And it was. Thanks for the faith in me, and for giving me a lift of heart when you wrote that. And Cheddar and Maniac tied for Photochopper! That is so cool. Have a great weekend, Al sans chains 00:10 1 5 MMX

Yeah, you see, I voted for Nach, not because I think you're crap, but because I knew you'd win eventually. Yeah, that's right. It's not because I think you're crap at all. ~ 09:13, May 1, 2010

Well, if I wasn't crap I couldn't have come up with this poor page. Now Nach has to win, and win big I tells ya, then some of the others, ya. And I was just at the clubhouse and it's huge. The champagne runs out of a fountain! Thanks again for your early on encouragement. Al des chainy 9:37 May Day MMX

Which reminds me, I have no life. So what do you want me to do about that page? ~ 09:39, May 1, 2010

Oh, that page. The Betty Boop user page? Or the monkeys page? And you so do have a life, I've never seen a corpse post a note, not even on their best days. And if you mean the mexican air force page, can you copy and move it to an article page with the same name. I'm bad at copy and paste, esp moving to a new page, and I'd probably mess it up or accidently drop it onto VFD or on the floor or something. Al 9:46 May Day MMX

Eh... that page was huffed by Mordillo, yesterday, with the message: sorry, we don't speak Inca. Did someone move it before? ~ 09:56, May 1, 2010

Not me. And the user page is still there. I have to log off soon, but I'll ask Mordillo about putting it back and explain why we like it. I wonder if the words actually mean something, to me the photos tell the story with the "nonsense" words (to us) as the foundation. Have you looked at the links in the photo captions. laughed and laughed when I finally did the link thing. Did you see my note in the section above about how to nom? Good talking to you. Al a few minutes later

To arms!

Good day loyal Peeing member, the management was wondering if you had noticed the state of the toilet recently, if not, why not? This is a call to you, as one of our better active reviewers, for a couple of reviews from you over the next few days. The queue is in the worst state it has been in for a little while and I would really appreciate you taking the time to do a couple of reviews. If you are able to help out then please review the older requests first.

What else do you need to hear? Get pissing! --ChiefjusticeXBox360 15:11, May 2, 2010 (UTC)

Mecca Vice will skip your home

"Much thanks!"

--Funnybony    06:51, May 3

Dragon Age

Thank you for an excellent review that very much confirmed my suspicions. I think you're right when you say I might have written myself into a hole. This calls for a very long & hard think (ie. forgetting about it entirely for several weeks).

Anyway it's probably about time you got another of these:

Rejoice, Hiatus Hernia! You have been entitled to the
Golden Shower Award

For donating high quality material to the Pee Review.

---

--Hugs and kisses, Black_Flamingo 16:21, May 5, 2010 (UTC)

That review wasn't as detailed as my usual ones, though. Still, I'm not noble enough to turn down your GSA. ~ 12:57, May 6, 2010

Proofreading Requested

I just saw that you were on and that you are listed as a proofreader and so I was wondering that if you had any free time, you could look over my article HowTo:Part the Red Sea? If you do, thank you in advance. If not, I understand that most people here are busy with their own things. --Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 03:36, May 14, 2010 (UTC)

Does it have to be now? I have to go out in 30 minutes. ~ 03:48, May 14, 2010

And I just had a brief and not very detailed look at it, didn't find any mistakes. ~ 03:51, May 14, 2010

Alright, thanks for giving it a quick check. I'll try to get someone else to do it since you are busy. Thanks again. --Sirrah CatshirE Chess the Striker2117 04:14, May 14, 2010 (UTC)