Uncyclopedia:VFH/THIS PAGE DOESNT EXSIST

Article: Insert article title here, without link	Score: 1.5
Nominated by:	76.18.154.29 21:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC)
For: 10.5	N+F 76.18.154.29 21:40, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Very good. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:25, 24 March 2009 (UTC) For Nachlader edit conflicted me! I'ma tell! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:26, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Weak For. The prose is a little rough but I laughed.-- 22:28, 24 March 2009 (UTC) For just for almost getting Hyperbole fired. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 02:02, 25 March 2009 (UTC) For. \o/ Hooray for meta-humour. Gis ym esiladnav! _LOB 16:35, 25 March 2009 (UTC) poop poop poop pooop -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 19:53, 25 March 2009 (UTC) For --Docile hippopotamus 12:49, 26 March 2009 (UTC) For.. I like the idea of it being used as a 1st april joke. Good idea indeed! Word. --Kit talk 22:40 26 March For..yes please --CrabPope 22:53, 26 March 2009 (UTC) FOR! It's better than Fisher Price!Saberwolf116 01:18, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
Against: 9	Against. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:48, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Na. Needs expansion. Mr N 22:16, Mar 24 'Against You idiots - it's missing an apostrophe. Doesn''t. Fix that, and maybe I'll change my vote. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:35, 24 March 2009 (UTC) ARRRGH MY EYES. If you're going to eyerape me like that, fucking warn me. My boss could have walked in. pillow talk 22:51, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Against.. Am I losing the plot here ? Meanwhile I will vote against. --Romartus 07:47, 25 March 2009 (UTC) Against.. I came up with this idea a week ago in MIRC, I got a negative response then, it's still a bad idea now. --—The preceding signed comment was added by Projectmayhem666 (talk • contribs). 00:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Against. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 03:01, Mar 26 lolgainst, and doubly so if someone fixes the link. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 04:26, 26 March 2009 (UTC) Oh, c'mon now, this is just stupid. —Sir Guildensternenstein 16:48, 26 March 2009 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 21:54, 24 Mar 2009 This could be the April Fool's Day prank we've been looking for. Featuring an article that doesn't exist! How people will be confused! --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 22:31, 24 March 2009 (UTC) I can't see how it would work. What we just put a red link on there? Mr N 22:38, Mar 24 No, I get it. You put a really funny paragraph that makes you want to read the whole thing, but no link to an existing article. Change the "more" to text, so it can't be clicked, maybe. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 22:39, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Just put "THIS PAGE DOESNT EXSIST" in big letters in that featured article box. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:41, 24 March 2009 (UTC) I agree w/ Global-T. I like the idea of a bunch of people trying to read the featured article and failing. For bonus, replace about 3/4ths of the link on the main page with text. Maybe with fancy span tags so they even get the little rollovers. --monika 23:11, 24 March 2009 (UTC) Check out Mr N 02:07, Mar 25 You bunch of bastards. ---kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 11:40, 26 March 2009 (UTC) AbSpang -OptyC Sucks! CUN17:05, 26 Mar