From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Scrub typhus: the geographic distribution of phenotypic and genotypic variants of Orientia tsutsugamushi
|
Score: 14.5 overqualified DJs
|
| Nominated by:
|
|
For: 21.5
|
 Nom and For I love this article. It's like the story of my life. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 19:39, 27 March 2009 (UTC)- For. IronLung 20:34, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Very For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 20:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- For Can I give this 12 for votes? I wanted this to be my first VFH nomination. Get this thing up there quick. --Globaltourniquet - (was TPLN) 21:04, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- For. Stupid ivory tower eggheads. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 21:35, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Fwhore. This one was fun to write.
 pillow talk 05:09, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- For. Took some rereads to get the joke, but I get it now --Asahatter (annoy) 00:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- For! Go indie music. All you motherfuckers are gonna pay. Love,
- For! This was good stuffs. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 15:28, Mar 30
- for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:29, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- For it reminded me of a review I once got. "Now, I don't know anything about this field, but I assumed this problem had been solved." --monika 22:42, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- Zombiebaron. —Sir SysRq (talk) 20:33, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nifty. --UU - natter
 12:40, Apr 4
- According to serological analysis, approximately 50% of isolates are seroreactive to Karp antisera, and approximately one-quarter of isolates are seroreactive to antisera against the prototype Gilliam strain. Oh how I laughed! Seriously though, D.J. Kelly is hot. -OptyC Sucks!
 CUN13:47, 4 Apr
- Science lol 81.165.225.248 21:46, 11 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Style
 Guide 17:53, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
- For --Cap'n Sir Ben GUN WotM VFH VFP 03:40, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Meta 500 02:39, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
- Lol for. User:Zheliel/sigz2 11:15, 21 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. I can't believe people don't get this. -- 15Mickey20 (talk to Mickey) 20:02, 23 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Of Course.-- You know what the music means... Our time is up. 22:31, 25 April 2009 (UTC)
- For. Nice article. Zeitgeist 15:16, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
|
Against: 7
|
 Against.. This is like reading a private joke. Got no idea what it is about but to make this an article for the front page - can it be reworded so that other people can understand it ?? Needs an intro that leads you into the article in my humble onion. --Romartus 11:17, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Huh? Are you serious? It's about a guy who criticizes a certain "scientific" publication. The conclusion is either that the guy is right about everything, or that the guy is just stupid. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:22, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- Against. I don't get it.--CrabPope 14:28, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- If you look above you, you might note I already explained it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 22:16, 28 March 2009 (UTC)
- I read it again. Is this a personal attack piece ?--Romartus 00:03, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Now read this and tell me what you think of it. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 00:12, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- People, please! Your fighting is tearing me apart! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 04:15, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Against. I don't get it. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 00:32, Mar. 29, 2009
- Against.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  08:28, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Against. Doesn't do it for me. Sorry. ~ 12:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Against - though it pains me to say so. Great article, best title on Uncyclopedia, but it's not going to draw people who haven't been here before into the site which I consider to be the point of a featured article. Rabbi Techno
 kvetch  Contribs  FOXES 14:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Against. I was more angry than amused after reading this, for some reason. Sir Groovester | Contributions | Talk Page 08:02, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Abstain. Something's injected apfel suchen into my brain - I'm lost here. --
 -kun "whisper sweet nothings into thine ear..." 22:19, 27 March 2009 (UTC)
- Abstain The article has a great idea but I really don't like the conclusion. It feels like there is more room for parody of academic criticism rather than just him trying to chat them up. Basically it needs just a bit more build up for the punchline. It is too good to vote against. --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     12:54, 4 April 2009 (UTC)
Okay, for those of you not getting this, it's a pretty simple joke: it's an article about a (real) scientific paper, written by a teenage jackass who has no idea what he's talking about. And he concludes, for some reason, that "D.J." is a job description rather than first and middle initials. pillow talk 01:25, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I fail to understand what other people fail to understand about this article. IronLung 05:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. What's there not to get? Zeitgeist 15:18, 26 April 2009 (UTC)
Ok I have read it AGAIN and the link article. My response remains the same. It isn't a stupid article but I really don't see how it can be a front page story if you need to explain it in HERE to us as well. It just needs to be tweaked a bit that is all - so that a general reader can get a grip on it as well. --Romartus 10:49, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Do you mean that the prose should be made more like "commoner's talk"? Because I think it's quite funny that the author speaks scientifically while coming to an utterly stupid conclusion. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:48, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Also, I still don't get what actually needed explaining. Could you tell me what you didn't get about the article after your first read? —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:56, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
I am going to suggest you post your comments on my talk page - otherwise this is going to spread all over VFH. --Romartus 12:00, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- I suggest you stop badgering the witness, Sock. If they don't like it they don't like it. ~ 12:04, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Sorry if it seemed like badgering. If someone doesn't like it, they're free to vote against. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 12:08, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
- Unless they're wrong. --Pleb SYNDROME CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!) 02:44, 30 March 2009 (UTC)
- That's exactly how I contracted mono. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 12:05, 29 March 2009 (UTC)
For people that don't get the joke, I think I explained the article quite well on Romartus' talkpage. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 01:13, 31 March 2009 (UTC)
- Comment. Science at its best. Style Guide 17:59, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
Nom and For I love this article. It's like the story of my life. --
Against.. This is like reading a private joke. Got no idea what it is about but to make this an article for the front page - can it be reworded so that other people can understand it ?? Needs an intro that leads you into the article in my humble onion. --
