User:Multiliteralist/SoS/Dylanvswhales

Dylan vs. whales.

• Whale bones - this can really go either way, but I think it would be brilliant if there were an article defending the viewpoint in the first two paragraphs of the History section, which is demoted to the stature of "pseudo-scientific" within the article itself. Extra points if it's written from the point of view of some college kid who has no idea what he's talking about but got so jazzed by the mentioned Youtube video that he brushed up on a couple of vaguely scientific volumes and is vehemently defending the man because the video had entertained him so much, which he may have been watching while he was stoned. -RAHB 10:37, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

How about interception on behalf of Dylan by the record industry? How about an article that claims nothing is made of whale bones any more, that the whole thing is ridiculous? A common-sense view. Then another angle after that depending on what comes up. -- Style  Guide 12:01, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Boneless whales. As source for the claim that whales are OK, and that we can go on listening to Dylan after all. I would write that as a record company proxy, naturally. -- Style  Guide 20:08, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Ah, love it! I'll begin work on Dylan and the RIAA's rebuttal tonight, and could probably whip up a boneless whales piece within the week, all things allowing. I could kiss your inexplicably trapezoidal comedy brain. -RAHB 02:13, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

If you write the RIAA rebuttal as their spokesperson, out in the open, we get one more step in between before the boneless whale appears. The counterthrust from an investigating journalist. Then the RIAA will have to come up with the boneless whale bit to cover their asses for a while more. -- Style  Guide 06:26, 28 February 2013 (UTC)

• UnNews:Bob Dylan a threat to whales OMG OMG!!
• UnNews:Dylan_says_whales_are_safe where some innocent UnNews editors have taken matters in their own hands. Interference but not very serious.Dylan's record company responded, see below. This might escalate into a three-sided campaign where everyone accuses everyone else of giving false information.
• Mother Bronson's whale boner catalogue is a list of things made of whale bones. If you come up with more, do add. This will be used to fuel anti-Dylan sentiment.
• UnNews:Testicle_molester_on_the_loose will be used to discredit someone
• Boneless whale is in passable state but do join in if you have something to say.
• UnNews:Mass destruction of boneless whales spotted by NASAL satellite OMG!!
• UnNews:Record company rep also says whales are safe. They finally reacted.

Foiter ideas

• Since boneless whales will turn to be the actual whales and the other kind will be something sinister and good for killing only, Mother Bronson's will need to raise hell: media is trying to undermine their whole product line by having the public know whale bones aren't actually whale bones.
• UnInterviews will soon be a necessary namespace for conducting the conversations between all these people.
• Also, let's use UN:LEGAL too. It can be funny. We'll not need to work it into everything but we could have one or two pending lawsuits, seeing how we set it up with huge amount of work back then.
• Later, someone could also start something against Mother Bronson's... maybe a competing line of products? Their slogan could be "50% better than Mother Bronson's!"

Note

This branched out a few more articles, I think.