Uncyclopedia talk:VFH/Why?:I'm In court, Mum

Cabal Decree #125/aaa! "No VFH Dramas" is now in effect. Any further discussion on this page will result in wide spread bans and public flogging at dawn.

Is this article Child Porn  ? An account of the rape and murder of a nine year old child ?

What does that matter?--HM (T) 08:15, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yes, it is. It is all a true account. But don't tell anyone, we're trying to keep it on the down-low, lest we be accessories after the fact. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 08:15, Sunday 22 August 2010 -

Being actually helpful, identify the article how you like- it's humor and can be interpreted in any way.--HM (T) 08:18, August 22, 2010 (UTC)

Yeah, umm, that thing he said. It's not true. At all. Still, don't tell the cops. You know. Just in case. ;) - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 08:19, Sunday 22 August 2010 -

good morning vietnam good night irene

"Good Morning Vietnam" features an interesting and amusing battle between mildly anarchic and stiff unfunny attempts at humour. Robin Williams is sent home but we know he was right and the Polka loving would be comedian and his sadistic boss with the incurable social disease were wrong. We all imagine ourselves to be Cronauer even if Williams's Cronauer is little like the real life DJ.

Uncyclopedia prides itself on its "madcap" parody/satirical style but depravity such as the rape and murder of a child is a poor source of chuckles and has been already well mined anyway by old routines like "The Aristocrats". I think it unlikely that anyone is going to masturbate while reading(who cares) or dwelling on this piece will rush out and find, rape, and then kill a child inflamed by its compelling prose, but equally i think its ugliness outweighs any zany absurdist on the edge appeal it seeks and mostly fails to create.

It serves to coarsen the mind more than it serves to amuse. It is a useful reference though, on a wider debate about what is art and the purpose of art and maybe should remain here for that reason. Should all movies about evil people feature a punishment ? That sort of universal consensus has gone from cinema and that departure is best first exemplified in Woody Allen's film "Crimes and Misdemeanours" where a murderer gets off scot free and actually in a short time gets over any slight guilt he might have felt. Does any medium have a moral obligation to attempt not to further corrupt the minds of its audience? Does a piece like this normalize child abuse a little more? Or does it have the opposite effect and bring it and its horror to prominence with benefits of awareness and action ? Are there legal obligations and consequences for a site that carries such material? With so much graphic porn available elsewhere on the net, these may seem like laughable questions but they merit consideration. Answers on a postcard please.⦿⨦⨀ phrage 16:30, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

tl;dr. Quit being a (as other places I frequent would call you) moralfag. Uncyclopedia isn't the place to whine about how jokes about raping children should be restricted. Call your local service provider and complain to them. Or, better yet, whine to Newt Gingrich, LIKE HE'D CARE! Seriously, this is a comedy site. If anyone reads this and goes out and rapes/kills a kid, it is because they were already going to do it. This article is a JOKE and in no way has any influence on anyone's actions at all. It isn't like it's saying "Hey, go fuck a 12 year old in the anus!" or some shit like that. You need to lighten up or fuck off. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 16:41, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Dexter -I suggested it not be restricted.I suggested it does not make guys go right out to rape and kill kids . Are you letting your desire to be seen to be cool and hip get in the way of reading and thinking? i am talking about more subtle and insidious effects like the one that gave you the permission to speak as you just did?⦿⨦⨀ phrage 16:54, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

This discussion is over, as you can see from the template up there, you have tried and failed to discuss this nicely so stop it. Anyone who continues the above discussion will be banned, now, who here would like a sticky bun? --ChiefjusticeGameCube 17:26, August 23, 2010 (UTC)

Chief, you already give me sticky buns on a regular basis. - Not particularly sincere, Sir ColinAYBCUNVFHWhoringMore Whoring at 17:54, Monday 23 August 2010 -

Comment

That Cabal decree thingy is pretty cool.  ~ Avast Matey!!! Happytimes are here!*  (talk) (stalk) Π   ~  ~  26 Aug 2010 ~ 01:08 (UTC)

Scary -and effective too -The wisdom of Solomon's seal in the Template ( Who knew Solomon kept seals- let alone trained ones !-they rocked the Kabbalah) I like the plural pun on giving sticky buns-subtle That dancing figure is pretty cool Mr Happy - is how to make one perceptible from simply clicking on it ? thank you for your kind words before, before my fall from grace -- ⦿⨦⨀ Phrage (talk) 04:00, August 26, 2010 (UTC)