Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Erudition

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Erudition[edit]

Just made a self-referential article around posh speech ('erudition' in posh speech). However, it just doesn't pack the punch of other self-referential articles like Incomprehensibility or AAAAAA!. Why is that and how can I make improvements?

P.S. Please hover your mouse over every link. A lot of jokes are hidden that way. Hipponias (talk) 08:23, 9 September 2020 (UTC)

While I do not have sufficent competence to do a full review, I'd say it looks good, and is at least a 40/50. @MrX: for more info. Gale5050 Complain about me! 01:00, 13 September 2020 (UTC)
Quick thought: this article is great! As for the pee review, I'd be happy to do it, but since I just did one for another article by Hipponias, I wanna wait a bit and see if someone else will do this one. That way Hipponias can get a different perspective on this. MrX blow me 16:14, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
@MrX: you can still do it, but I'll ping User: Zombiebaron, User: Cat the Colourful, User: Kev and User: Y. If you don't mind, can you do 1 of my pee reviews? [1] [2] [3]? Gale5050 Complain about me! 20:30, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Yes, I know that I'm allowed to do it, but I'd prefer to wait and see if someone else will. MrX blow me 20:52, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
@Zombiebaron: interested in a review? Gale5050 Complain about me! 20:57, 14 September 2020 (UTC)
Humour:
Concept:
Prose and formatting:
Images:
Miscellaneous:
Final Score: Not reviewed yet
Reviewer:
Not reviewed yet!
Review now