Talk:28 Days Later

i don't get why this is overly American, if its a British flick. that makes me upset F*CKING FIX IT.

do it yourself

Thank you for your suggestion! When you feel an article needs fixin', please feel obligated to make whatever changes you feel are needed, (even though they'll probably be reverted 5 seconds later). Uncyclopedia is a wiki, so almost anyone can edit almost any article by almost simply following the edit link almost at the top. You don't even need to log in in most cases! (Although there are some reasons why you might like to...) The Uncyclopedia Cabal encourages you to be italic. Don't worry too much about making honest mistakes—they're likely to be found and corrected quickly, and your 6 month ban will fly by faster than you think. If you're not sure how editing works, check out proper wiki formatting, or use the sandbox to try out your vandalizing skills. - P.M., WotM, & GUN, Sir Led Balloon (Tick Tock) (Contribs) 22:32, Feb 14

no fuck u

i just didn't think this was particularly funny, i get the joke about over Americanizsing a British movie but it didn't hold together very well and was too random. maybe try tidying up the non-sequiturs? oh and why would gays re-making 28 days be a bad thing? all i do is think of ways of improving it. meh, have fun!--orian57 22:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

I would suggest doing as above. If you want to fix it, more power to you. HTBFANJS should be an invaluable guide. I look forward to hearing about it.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 20:58, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

oh I've just had a thought actually, maybe you could incorporate it into the article (or maybe not) but 28 gays later sounds like quite an exiting (or not) porno. meh.--orian57 22:13, 8 March 2008 (UTC)