Forum:We need the uncyclopedia versions of the Wiki's UW-vandalism
We need some kind of User warnings so we can decrease the shitty edits.
Warning 1: Thank you for trying to make Uncyclopedia funny, as you did at Jimmy Wales, unfortunately, It had to be reverted because it didn't appear to be funny to me. Please take a look at our guide on how to be funny and not just stupid, then redo your edit. Thank you.
Warning 2: Please refrain from making unfunny edits to Uncyclopedia, as you did to Adolf Hitler. Your edits appear to be shitty and crap, so it had to be removed and was sent to the 5th layer of hell. Thank you.
Warning 3: Please stop your shitty edits. The next time you make Uncyclopedia unfunny, as you did with this edit to Oscar Wilde, You may be blocked from editing.
Warning 4: This is your last warning. The next time you make Uncyclopedia unfunny, as you did at George Bush, You will be blocked from editing without no further warning.
Only Warning: This is your ONLY warning; The next time you make uncyclopedia unfunny, as you did to Penis , you will be sent to the 5th layer of hell, and you will be blocked without no further notice.
Planning to adapt as the Uncyclopedia User warnings to remind people to be useful and funny and not to be making crappy and shitty edits. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Dreth (talk • contribs)
- Hmm, I rememer there was sometime, somewhere some sort of welcome-template which told that the specific user's edits aren't that good. Or something. I, personally, do not see any point in more templates thankyousoeverymuch Zzz
14:36, 30 June, 2013 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia is Uncyclopedia, Uncyclopedia is not Wikipedia or does it try to be; it's a parody of Wikipedia. I'd guess that many of our admins prefer a more personal approach instead of templates — after all, we all can't be as lazy as I am (hopefully anyway)!
- Then again, what's there to prevent you from creating said templates and seeing how long it takes for someone to delete 'em or start using 'em?
- Also, a note from your friendly Grammar Nazi (that's me, if you were wondering): wiki is not a proper noun in English, so it shouldn't be capitalized. Wikipedia, Uncyclopedia and such on the other hand are proper nouns and they need to be written with an initial capital letter. Thank you for your co-operation. --
Jack Phoenix, professional killeradmin (Whine?) • (Wikia ♥ ads) 17:17, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Uncyclopedia is Uncyclopedia, Uncyclopedia is not Wikipedia or does it try to be; it's a parody of Wikipedia. I'd guess that many of our admins prefer a more personal approach instead of templates — after all, we all can't be as lazy as I am (hopefully anyway)!
- {{Oh Dear}} -- The Zombiebaron 18:48, 30 June 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should rewrite it to be less insulting. Or just give them the regular {{Welcome}} and then specifically address their bad edits. --EMC [TALK] 13:08 Jul 1 2013
- Yeah, I agree that {{Oh Dear}} needs a facelift. At the very least it should be shortened to match the current style of {{Welcome}}. -- The Zombiebaron 15:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
- Perhaps we should rewrite it to be less insulting. Or just give them the regular {{Welcome}} and then specifically address their bad edits. --EMC [TALK] 13:08 Jul 1 2013
then rewrite it hotadmin4you 98.114.20.64 18:50, 1 July 2013 (UTC) (Dreth who is logged out)
- I believe that is actually pronounced {{sofixit}} The Woodburninator
Minimal Effort ™ 06:24, 2 July 2013 (UTC) - Oh hell nah! We need to keep {{Oh Dear}} as long and informative as it is! In fact, we should make it longer! Scold them trolls more! --The Shield of Azunai DSA510 Insight into the mind of an aspergian: 20:06, 1 July 2013 (UTC)
