Forum:MASSIVE IMAGE COLLABORATION
Let's do a massive image collaboration. Something like everybody gets a corner of a large 10+ sided star/shape thingy and where it meets in the middle everything will mix a bit and stuff. Or something. Then we could turn it into a collaborative ninjastar to hand out for works of co-operation. so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 18:17, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- That sounds hard. We don't do hard. We 'chop heads from one person onto a body of another, mostly. Also, that's slow. With writing collabs you can sort-of do it in real-time. With 'chopping, not so much. But good luck, anyway. Take my comments with a grain of salt. Or sugar, 'cause I'm sweet. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 19:48, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
- I like this, but we can do better than that. Each contributor gets one pixel. (maybe admins can have two). Then we can easily construct a photorealistic image of a boa constrictor strangling Oprah Winfrey while she is petting a plastic replica of Donald Trump's hairpiece. Or something. We would have to be careful not to harm any animals. --Pieface 12:15, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Cool. Here's my pixel: . --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 12:17, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
- Is it the collaboration or the image that would be massive? -- Sir Mhaille (talk to me)
- I have only just now noticed the word 'massive'. All in caps, too. That is really obscene.--Pieface 12:42, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
I was thinking about something like this: where everyone that wants to participate gets a section, more sections can be added if necessary, but about five times as big, or bigger, even. So something like this: so sayeth Sliferjam ~ Talk * Sock * Jam * Gallery * Fearless Fosdick? 15:43, 15 May 2007 (UTC)
this aint no ninjastar! its that david thingy (or was david a ninja?). secondly, if you want BIG image, it should be sharper. not just stretched. --aigeJobu, 23:34, 20 May 2007 (UTC)