Protected page

Forum:Keep or delete "100 reasons to ban Aimsplode"?

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Keep or delete "100 reasons to ban Aimsplode"?
Note: This topic has been unedited for 937 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

This article has already been deleted, as the general consensus seems to be against keeping it.

Some context

100 reasons to ban Aimsplode was started by Cassie in late May/early June 2019, while Aimsplode was a crat on Uncyclopedia (and the fact that he used Uncyclopedia to attract underage users to his house was unknown to me, and several others). The initial intent of the article was to create a "joke" set of reasons why Aimsplode should be banned from Uncyclopedia. Now that the truth has been revealed, whether this article should still remain visible is debatable, because on one hand, it would be better for such an article to be hidden from public sight, in order to not attract attention to Aimsplode's obviously unacceptable behavior, but on the other hand, this article has been in the works for four months prior to Aimsplode being banned, and has received plenty of contributions from many members of the community prior to this revelation.

The article

100 reasons to ban Aimsplode - The article itself. I've censored it for now, as the vote is taking place.

(huffed) - The original uncensored article. It's in my userspace. A notice will be plastered on top stating Aimsplode's ban, if the article will be kept in mainspace.

The vote

Please either vote for (or Boner) if you are in favor of keeping the article in mainspace, or vote against (or Limp boner) if you are not in favor of keeping the article in mainspace. Feel free to abstain and leave a comment.

Score: -2
  • For Notice that while we understand how serious the allegations levied against Aimsplode are, we are still able to talk about them in a lighthearted manner. I don't feel that we need to downplay any humor we might want to naturally share towards the topic just because of its gravity. We can do both at the same time. It's not too soon. — Capitalis quadrata Y.SVG (talk) (contributions) 22:04:12 2019/10/03 UTC
  • Symbol for vote.svg For. Just put a disclaimer at the top, the history of the article and the recent revelations. Maybe protect the page. Everyone worked too hard on this article to bury it. We already have articles about people who have done similar or worse. Black-2.jpg PF4Eva, the President of Imagination Vote for me My tax returns 23:04, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
  • Mydixaflopin Limp boner. We should give him no more attention as it only inflates his ego. Alvgjerd the duck (quack quack) 15:07:09, Oct 04, 2019 (CEST)
  • Comment Isn't this what VFD is for? --EMC [TALK] 04:57 Oct 5 2019
  • Delete I don't think this belongs in mainspace. -- The Zombiebaron 21:13, 7 October 2019 (UTC)

Replace Aimsplode with Zombiebaron

Score: 1,000
  • FOR I think it's best to resurrect the article and replace Aimslpode with Zombiebaron and then remove any personalized criticism clearly directed at Aimsplode and replace it with one of the many legitimate criticisms of our favourite screwed up Zombie!!! My vote is worth 1,000 votes. ShabiDOO 14:59, 13 October 2019 (UTC)


Page deleted

  • Deleted said page during a swoop of my userspace.  Cassandra  (talk) 23:22, 10 May 2021 (UTC)