Forum:Every 240 seconds, a useless article is generated
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Every 240 seconds, a useless article is generated
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6854 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.
This thing came to my attention when I checked out the new stuff in Pee Review:
See any use of this article in policy pages, greetings and the like?
-- Colonel Swordman 12:40, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
On second thought, maybe it's not really that great. Anyway, any opinions?
-- Colonel Swordman 13:01, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Fnord ~ 13:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
- Nopy --
King of Beer 14:29, 9 July 2006 (UTC) - i couldn't really see it as a policy page, its not really like that kind of thing, also as imrealised highlighted in the Pee Review the quoted line is the strongest part of the page at the moment, ironicly the line "By the time you read the full article you will have seen the better bits already around 5 times." is now true.--Sir Silent Penguin
"your site makes no sence" The illusion is complete 17:41, 9 July 2006 (UTC) - It had a certain charm, but a bit too "not-goodish"--is the word I was looking for-- to actually subject n00bs to when telling them not to be stupid and just funny. Our old methods work better (execution, torture, brainwashing, fornication via garden hose, etc.). So let's stick with those. Also, fornicate pervert on tawdry pervert with old tawdry pervert and tawdry, tawdry pervert fornicate with pervert!!! FNORD!!! NOPY!!! --Señor DiZtheGreat
CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 21:04, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
