Forum:Chuck Norris rewrite

Forums: Index > Village Dump > Chuck Norris rewrite

Note: This topic has been unedited for 6096 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Here goes. I was in the IRC and Kip said "anyone who writes a decent version of Chuck Norris is the chosen one." I, desiring to train with a stereotypical Asian guru as is the way of chosen ones and twos, rewrote the thing. Since the previous one was extremely terrible, I decided to go italic and just replace the damn thing. Please let me know if this is a problem.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:22, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

You win. Ж WHEEEEE! 00:29, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Awesome. I'm putting it on my watchlist for obvious reasons. --Roman Dog Bird 00:33, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

DrSkullthumper bows before the chosen one – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 04:21 Aug 30, 2007

I don't know. I found it sort of boring. I preferly like Chuck Norris Bashers. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 04:18, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

I think it would be best to combine both the current version and the old version together. This version is more liniar, but it is not as funny as the old, so a combination of both would be perfect.--Little Jimmy 10:07, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

The crop circle joke is gold- I've never laughed so hard at something so unfunny! Great rewrite.--Got Milk? 16:11, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

This is in a different universe to the old pile of shit. And it was really really shit. This is great. The Oblong Lobster 19:16, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey I've actually got a much better idea, why don't we make an UnBook with the title along the lines of, "The uneventful life of Chuck Norris". Then as for the original page, just revert it I guess.--Little Jimmy 07:19, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Why not? Couse the whole point of the rewrite was to turn Chuck Norris into a decent page. Good work Kip!---Asteroid B612 (aka Rataube) - Ñ 09:18, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Kip? All he did was put the idea into my head. In fact, you rule Kip. I never would've done this without you.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 00:56, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

That's right. Hence, I should take all the credit. : ) -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 04:32, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Don't put any of the old article into this one. Even ED's Chuck Norris was funnier than the old one on here. The Oblong Lobster 17:28, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

I like the new Chuck Norris, but I also liked the old. I think the new one should stay the same and the old should be called something else to represent a different form of Chuck Norris.--The goracle 19:44, 31 August 2007 (UTC)

Well that's your second edit The goracle! The old Chuck Norris article wasn't just bad, it was the worst that Uncyclopedia has ever had to offer. Why should Chuck Noris have special permission to be allowed to be shite? The Oblong Lobster 02:26, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Holy hell! Matt lobster is back! I thought you was gone forever! I guess it was just the summer that done takeded you. Hopefully you'll be back fo' sho now. You'll notice a new VFH system, btw. I know this because you usually vote on VFH when you're here. That is all.-Sir Ljlego, GUN VFH FIYC WotM SG WHotM PWotM AotM EGAEDM ANotM + (Talk) 02:31, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

Well, except that lobster sticks to magnet. That is all. ----OEJ 04:06, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

I honestly have no memory of leaving the above comment. Drunken internet use. I hope I haven't ordered another Steps CD of Amazon. The Oblong Lobster 10:38, 1 September 2007 (UTC)

VFH? --AAA! (AAAA) 00:54, 1 September 2007 (UTC)