User talk:Cajek/Pee

WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??!

Is this a super secret list? ~ 00:20, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

God dammit, you scared me-- Yes, I want to nominate a whole slew of people next month for ROTM, in the hopes that they start reviewing more! SSSHhHHHhhHHH!

  Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 00:23)

I'm watching you, boy... Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:00, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Watching in the sexy way?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 01:02)

You: What could Cajek possibly be doing with that list? Is he going to hunt these people down if they don't do thorough reviews? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??! Boomer & Mordillo

What could Cajek possibly be doing with that list? Is he going to hunt these people down if they don't do thorough reviews? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??! I have a strange feeling of Deja Vu ~ 13:47, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

What could Mordillo possibly be doing with the talk page of that list? Is he going to have "relations" with the people on that list? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 13:49)

What could Cajek be doing with my messages? Is he going to stalk me from now on? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? ~ 13:53, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

What could Mordillo possibly be doing with his admin powers while he's on this talk page? Is he going to put his ban stick where it doesn't belong? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 5 @ 13:56)

Does the sun shines from that place I'll put my ban stick? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? ~ 14:02, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

Hmm... So... There was this guy right, who like, did this stuff you know, then like went somewhere, and like, dam, I forget what happened next... (Passes the drinks around...) MrN 19:40, Dec 5

Where did this guy come from? Is he just here to make us all drunk? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:43, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

What are all these people doing here? Are they trying to secks me up instead of reviewing articles? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 00:46)

oh shit...the Cabal meeting started, and Cajek is still here? He's not part of the Order! Grand Peebah, fetch the lizard skins and funny hats....we have a new body to evicerate.....unless...hmmm....QUICKLY, CAJEK...Respond to the following sentence: "Will no-one help the widow's son?"

Well, I'm sure as hell not going to help him!!!! IS THAT FAST ENOUGH?!??! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON???   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 04:52)

Brothers, clearly this man has no knowledge of the Bavarian Illuminati, or the widow's son, or even the 'three ju's'...and how about that EYE in the pyramid? He is clueless ! Let's take him and make him one of our own, for he is ripe and fresh...untainted by the other so-called cabals (lower-case 'c'). One final test before acceptance, Cajek. Answer quickly, answer true: WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON??? AND DOES it require lubrication?? (Extra credit if you can find me a really HOT female siamese-twin..nymphomanics preferred) ...p.s. im about to finish another review tonight.

OMG I CAN'T CONTAIN THE FUCK ANYMORE! PASS TEH LUBRICANT! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON??!?!?!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 @ 05:41) p.s. that's awesome keep up the good work! Pee review is almost completely cleared!

I cant clear the list because as soon as i review one of yours, you put up 2 more...WHAT THE FUCK DO YOU WANT FROM ME???? I contend that Cajek is plotting the demise of all my free time. It's a fucking conspiracy, and you ALL are in on it..i just know it...even my HOUSE is in on it...i hear it, late at night, laughing at me...well, Cajek---well, House---Fuck you both! I'll get both of you, see if i don't! And the rest of you, conspiring with the lawn gnomes...your not gonna get me, im wise to you! WTFIGO !?!?

Where did my house go? Was it stolen by those damned lawn gnomes? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??!?!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 6 / 15:37)

Where did Finnius come from? Are they conspiring to conquer Pee Review? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:11, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I just took a dollar bill out of my wallet, and printed on it were all the timestamps that i have EVER removed from my sig !! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON !!??!!??!!

Strangely, I do NOT see Cajek's name listed in the table...WHY NOT ? Put it in there dammit. "One of us, one of us...gooble gobble, gooble gobble"

you must have done a minor typo when you put in your stats on the table...i fixed it for you..no thanks required..

Sorry Cajek,. that review of the soul doesn't count. Dirty cheater. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 22:38, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

I get a bunch of weirdos around here.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 10 / 02:50)

i have a 61 for an average ?? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON !!??!!?? – Preceding unsigned comment added by finnius (talk • contribs) STUPID!

I have a question mark for an average??! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON??!?!?!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 01:54)

I've actually non-sig'd 2x in a couple of minutes..im tired from this day..it has been...eventful. Now will someone, for the love of Minnie Pearl's soiled panties, tell me WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON ??!!??!! make that 3..AARRGGHH!! GAA..im too tired..i am leaving now...

Why is he leaving? is he too tired from fucking many women during his TYATU review? WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!??!?!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 02:01)

All joking aside, my cat was keeping me up all night crying in pain (from another stroke)..at 5:03 I witnessed one of the most horrific death-thoes I have seen in YEARS. Started drinking very early in the morning. Took on TYATU to keep my mind off of the whole thing...buried the cat around 3:00, went back to the PEE and finished that a couple hours ago..It's been an exhausting day. Tomorrow I promise to WRITE an article (holy shit)

aaaaaaaaaaaaaaawwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww jeeesussss Well, your cat had a very loving owner, man. What the... What the fuck is... Idon'thavetheenergy   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 02:10)

How about actually putting you scores onto your pee table Cajek you lazy ass so we know what we are really up against? If you cheat, I will kick you in the balls, well, I won't know, but who cares... Why not do it? The table that is, not the balls thing. Dam I wish everyone would stop talking about balls. Oh, It's only me. Balls. MrN 03:07, Dec 11

You want me to grade myself and everything? WHAT THE BALLS IS GOING ON   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 11 / 03:32)

YES, and if you give a shitty grade that we dont like..ill slap a "Poison" on you (I feel the power coursing thru my veins!) AND WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON WITH ALL THE FUCKING BALLS ALL OF A SUDDEN ??!!??!!

Well I'm not going to do it am I? I'm too fcukin lazy. I think we can assume that all your reviews are 'In Depth' so just add em up and put em in the box... Then we can compare ourself against the great one... Did you find out what was going on incidentally? MrN 03:44, Dec 11

Um...

What's the last box for? I don't quite get it :P or why I'm in the same box as Ggarfield ~Fag x FS

Excuse me, did we correctly...

Fag is currently the 5th best reviewer in Uncyclopedia, same as GGarfield.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 14 / 19:53)

Well done

I'm afraid...

You missed my reviews on Garry's Mod and UnNews:Jimbo Wales doesn't believe in Santa Claus--Æ 00:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

Nope, I saw them. First off, great job on both. Second of all, I was banned for a day... like Bozoboy only not as cool.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 17 / 00:32)

Yeah, way to get banned for the last 24 hours. Unlike me, who was doing useful things in said 24-hour period. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 00:36 Dec 17, 2007

WHOA! You reviewed something AAAAAND vandalized my userpage??? :D   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 17 / 00:53)

swims in...seas Cajek...and trouts off "WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON !!??!!

did i DO a 16th review?

I don't recall it

Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/Injuns?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 17 / 23:09)

oh, that page. I had done that on Dec.6..it got blanked and reverted..I "think" you had previously counted it. Just trying to be accurate. It seems to me that in early Dec. you were constantly updating your tables, sometimes even HOURLY. I'm thinking you had counted this one BEFORE the blankings (by one of the authors, no less)

Hmmm. Finnius, count up how many scores you have in the average scores section, if you would   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 15:35)

yes dear

Thank you sweetums   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 18 / 16:57)

NXWave is back doing reviews?

We're doomed. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:18 Dec 27, 2007

isn't this the guy that makes pictures of things?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 18:21)

He's the guy that used to do reviews at a hundred miles an hour without actually helping anyone. And the guy that flooded the Poopsmith's Lounge with nearly 200 articles. And the guy that VFD's articles as "vanity" without knowing what "vanity" is. And the guy that template spams {{fix}} and {{rewrite}} all over the bloody site. Yeah. Bundles of fun, that guy. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 18:27 Dec 27, 2007

He put a rewrite tag on my The Color Problem a few days before it was featured. Hang on, we don't have serious conversations on this talk page! Where is the Aardvark polish? Pass the nibble grease... MrN 18:34, Dec 27

Speaking of nibble grease, NXWave's reviews are utter shite. So are his articles, but you didn't hear ME say it. Is he like Manforman on annoying-steroids?   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 27 / 18:38)

He did poor reviews on two of my articles recently, I think we need an admin to speak with him, ban him, or something...--Æ 01:44, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Y'all seem to have forgotten that he's also the one that started the illegal Uncyclopedia store and didn't pull it for a week. I vote kill 'im. Also, WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON???, as per MrN. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 01:45, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Please, for the love of Sophia, don't ban him. He's writing an article that I am very excited about, and it would be a huge shame if he couldn't finish it. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 05:43, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Nobody here has the power to ban, Kip!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 05:45

Well, I couldn't say it on Ban Patrol becuase I would get banned again. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 05:47, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Meh, it would be better if NXWave just silently disappeared.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 05:50

Cabbage!

{{cabbage}} Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 08:17, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

JESUS CHRIST IT'S HIDEOUS!! WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON?!?!??!?!??!   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 13:18

Apparent this is Sir Modusoperandis comment regarding the above discussion. It is probably rather accurate. Criticising someone for being a poor judge of quality is one thing, but un-fortunitly that is no grounds for a long term ban. NX has actually done some rather useful stuff around the place here and there anyway. I think that Ban Patrol is really to be used by the likes of us to indicate new issues to Admins which warrant banning. As far as we are concerned, when talking about well know users this will generally only mean a history of cyberbullying, or large scale dickery. I'm not sure NX has shown this, although he has done some rather aggressive PE reviews his comments were not bulling. Being the lazy ass that I am, I did not read all of the post before adding my 0.5 pence, and had no idea that people were talking about Ban Patrol here. Ban Patrol is probably about the most serious page on this site, so we really have to think once, twice and then maybe again before posting to it... /me smears nipple grease on the portable Aardvark polishing machine. MrN 13:41, Dec 28

I figured it was just cabbage. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 13:49, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

It's far more than cabbage, sir. The cabbage represents life in uncyclopedia: motionless, made up of letters, tastes like foliage.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 13:51

I have no idea what you're talking about on this page. To be honest, I stumbled on this page and, noticing its lack of cabbage, took it upon myself to add some, in template form. A random act of cabbageness, as it were. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 13:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

The Cabbagaitor! He absolutely will not stop until you have cabbage. MrN 13:58, Dec 28

Modus, I'm sorry, but that's the weakest action movie premise I've EVER HEARD. Go back to Hollywood, you godless cabbage.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 14:00

What?

If you want me to be on topic, someone who consistently gives poor quality reviews should be:

1. Warned on this talkpage to shape up
2. Added to Flammable's Office if he doesn't
3. Banned if he continued to be crap
4. Banned longer if the previous rule didn't work
5. Banned permanently if he builds a hut in Nevada and writes a manifesto of some kind. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 14:06, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Whoa! NOBODY wanted you to be on topic that much! In fact, I don't think a section called "cabbage" should be on topic anyways, but that's just my opinion.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 14:09

I'm really thinking about stealing that Cabbagaitor idea. -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 14:12, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Stealing that idea is similar to stealing from the dump, except without the guard dogs. Also, it smells worse.   Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 14:14

Not if it's fresh! Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 16:13, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Hey boomer, I got an idea for you...

An actual picture of MrN9000

GO REVIEW SHIT!

If you're having trouble, just go review one of my pieces of shit I got up there.

  Le Cejak • <-> (Dec 28) 16:28

Actually, I'm supposed to review piss. I don't dispute that what you have up there is crap, however. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 16:33, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

Ah, the discussion is back to more important matters I see... Much as I obviously hate to criticise you Sir, if I may quote from our Holy Peeing Bible...

“ It might be evident that the author of the article was not aware... ”

Clearly Articles are 'crap' and should be 'pissed' on be those Peeing. I find it disturbing that a Man of such distinction as yourself could be mistaken on such matters. MrN 16:47, Dec 28

Actually, my good man, the name of the process itself, "Pee Review", directly states the process of reviewing Pee, as does the name of our good society People for the Evaluation of Excrement and Influencing Nominations for Greatness. As evaluate is almost synonymous to review, it can be correctly inferred that Pee Review is indeed meant for reviewing pee, and not any other form of excrement. Therefore, by Cajek's direct statement that his articles are "shit" they are hereby exempt from Pee Review and I therefore don't have to do a damn thing. I shall now return to the nothing that I've been doing for the last five months. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 16:55, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

OK, an important issue has been raised here. Obviously everyone agrees that Pee Review itself is shit. But, you can't piss on piss, or shit on shit, that would be copying, so what are the correct terms to use?

Shit or Piss???

Shit Articles Pissed On
Piss Articles Shat On
MrN was right, it's all Pants	Trousers Obviously I'm in the Pantaloon camp. MrN 18:02, Dec 28
What the fuck is going on?	Some of this,
Reviewed piss	A little of this,
FU MrN	And tons of this. Happy New Years! Shouldn't I be partying? PEEING 18:14, 28 December 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Obviously this page should have been flushed long ago.

Sorry to lower the general tone...

I'm probably not the only person to have noticed that a certain individual appears to have taken a short leave of absence and as such has not been able to update this page for a while. Fortunately Under user has heroically stepped into the breach to fill the void left by Sir Randoms departure, and is doing a great job. We all owe him for bothering to keep the PEE end up while cajek is away. Anyone who has tried updating the page knows that it's not one of the most glamorous tasks one can choose to perform around here...

From looking at the Peeing page it says that updating this list can only be done by members of rank "Attending Urologists and above". Now I know we did this because we only wanted people who know the difference between a "good" review and a "bad" review to be updating the list, especially when it came to judging their own performances. Considering that UU appears now to be carrying the load all by himself these days, and I'm too dam lazy to do it myself, I wonder if this is still a good idea...

We don't let you into Peeing until you have done "at least 5 good reviews", so it's likely that everyone in Peeing actually knows what a good review is. I have noticed at least one individual in particular who shows interest in updating the list, so I wonder if we should open up it up to everyone who is a member of Peeing.

If we do, I would suggest that Attending Urologists and above get to override an update done by a fresh stain if they disagree with it.

Obviously if you're happy to do it all by yourself UU, that's the end of the story, and we carry on as before, but I just thought I would make the suggestion.

I guess that anyone who bothers to watch this page has a right to have a say on this one, so what do people think?

Also, and obviously. WHERE ARE YOU CAJEK! and... WHAT THE FUCK IS GOING ON. MrN 21:47, Feb 5

WHAT THE FUCK WAS THAT MESSAGE ABOUT?! AND WHY THE FUCK ARE YOU ALL COVERED IN SHIT?! Brigadier Sir Mordillo GUN UotY WotM FP UotM AotM MI³ AnotM VFH +S 21:50, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

TROUSERS, TROUSERS, TROUSERS, TROUSERS, TROUSERS, TROUSERS.

“In British Britain, trousers are trousers, and pants are pants you know”

~ MrNs attempt at a British reversal joke

/me Sorry wipes the brown stains from my UNDERPANTS. MrN 21:58, Feb 5

Meh, I'm happy to keep doing it in the gaps between stuff happening at work. Just like you're shovelling shit at the VFD coalface. But aside from that, why the hell not make cigarette a urologist anyway? I don't recall there being stringent guidelines for so doing beyond "if Boomer likes the face of them". And let's face it, with half the fresh stains not reviewing much at the moment, a few others disappearing off the radar, and the queue extending again, anyone who wants to help out shoud be welcomed! Hell, if it keeps going at this rate, Boomer may have to do another review! ;-)

Now, that's quite enough of that, if there's pants related conversation, I want in. PANTS TO THE LOT OF YOU! WHAT THE GO IS FUCKING ON? Oh, I don't quite have the hang of this, do I? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 22:23, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

Now steady on. Things have not gotten that serious have they? Boomer may have to do another review??? Surely it's not that bad over there... Oh, I nomed his faggyness for Attending Urologists. Can't believe I didn't think of doing that myself. MrN 23:20, Feb 5

OK, let's not get crazy here. It's not that bad yet. IT'LL BE FINE, MAN!!! *ahem* Yea, I don't think anybody that cares pays attention to the "Attendants only" sign. I didn't put it there, nor did I have any part of it being put there, or even of this list being made, but I think it at least keeps away the idiots that would screw with it. As evidenced by Fag, anybody that cares enough can already go ahead and edit it. And, *sigh*, I'll try to pick up some of the workload. Every night from 8-9 I'm on here (both surfing recentchanges and on IRC (helpful info if you want to find me (mountain time, of course (or -7:00 GMT, if you prefer (fucking Brits))))) with pretty much nothing to do. I don't QVFD because I don't have a script, and I therefore can't beat any of the other late-nighters to it (I also refuse to steal somebody else's js without knowing exactly what it does), same story with vandalism reverting, so I'm pretty much limited to VFD and, occasionally, VFH voting. So, if you want to take a break one day, Under User, I can pick up where the last updater left off. Also, I propose that the last listed review be linked at the top of the page so the next person to come knows where to start. If you're already doing that and I just didn't see, feel free to laugh at me behind my back. I promise not to cry too much. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:25, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

I'm happy to keep doing the list as I said - it fills up the gaps while I wait for something else to do at work that are too small to be filled by another review or (heaven forfend) some actual writing! I link each person's last completed review in the right hand column, but if you like I'll also add the most recent checked above the list. Things are slowing down PEEING wise though. The man and legend OEJ hasn't been seen in a while, Cajek's on hiatus, a few others who came an and got stuck in in the first flush of joining appear to have vanished, so there's not many of us keeping it ticking over right now. Still, no-one's actively complaining, so meh! --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 09:06, 6 February 2008 (UTC)

Cajek again

Hey UU, if you think I did a bad review or something, please tell me. You don't have to say every single review I did is good, even if I am Cajek. Thank you for doing the list, it's a public service!   Le Cejak • <-> Mar 26 (21:31)

Them sounds like fightin' words. 10 bucks on the foreigner. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 23:34, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Don't worry, in those circumstances, I won't hold back. (Surely Boomer can't make any kind of comment about an innocent statement like that, can he?) --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 19:42, Mar 27

Does that mean that the fight is on? You might want to hold back a little, Cajek might not be in this fight completely. Either way, I'm taking all bets. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 04:26, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Love the new look of the place chaps!

Dam swanky. I have windged to Cajek about this before, but how's about listing more than just the top 5 on the Peeing page? Maybe have top 7 or 8? I just think it might inspire a bit more competition amongst the new users. Not that I'm worried about dropping off the bottom. Oh no. Not me. Not at all. /me looks towards the bottom of the list... Oh, sorry... WTF is going on... MrN 01:01, Apr 8

Top 5 people who have NOT won RotM? We'll have to do that after the top 5 is all RotM. WTFIGO???   Le Cejak • <Apr 08, 2008 [1:19]>

Lesse, the top 8 would... /me counts put me on the list? Are you really sure you're ready for that? Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:32, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

Oh, I meant top 8 except Boomer. Obviously. MrN 01:35, Apr 8

Hmm, the "good" reviewers section appears to be separated from the PEEING member's section. I forgot that. Disregard. Just be ready. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 01:36, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

This guy needs to learn how to pee

His name is SilveryMinnow. Now I know he's just a n00b, but look at his reviews. Most of them's been reverted due to not following UN:PRG but he just refuses to read it. Most of his reviews consists of stuff he thinks is on a 5-point scale. He doesn't give out any information wether they're good or not, he doesn't give out any advice, he doesn't even go deep into the article. At one point, he even reviewed his own article. Which may be against Pee Review Guidelines. I don't know.

He mostly shows the inability to pee properly. When I reminded him properly of his reviews not following the Pee Review Guidelines. He posted this, All Pee is tainted!". Which is incorrect cause most pee here is fresh, not tainted. And tainted means bad. What should we do about it? --The Improver talk • contribs • 07:43, Apr 24 2008 (UTC)

I would just post on his talk page, but you've done that already... I don't know, maybe go to ban patrol?   Le Cejak • <Apr 24, 2008 [12:34]>

Let's all spread rumors about him so people look at him funny when he walks down the hall and knock the books out of his arms and we all laugh at him except SysRq who helps him pick up his books and glares at us and becomes his friend and makes us his friend too and we all have good times together and he looks back and thanks SysRq for making his life not a living hell until we remember that he gives really crappy reviews and hate him again and he becomes depressed and then we throw him a big birthday party with a clown. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 00:01, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

Let's forget everything Boomer said and start out being his friend but telling rumors behind his back about him being a criminal and wait until he gets arrested in front of the class and laugh at him as he gets thrown in jail and then at the end throw him a party with a clown while hes in prison lets do it itll be cool.   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [0:12]>

Naw, I say that we get Cajek pregnant and then write a song about it that we play over the school's PA system every day before first period so that he has to listen to it while he has to walk to his awful Chem class with his lab partner who always smells like old cars and spells his name differently on every test he's ever turned in. Then we can convince mean ol' Mr. Muir to let us throw Cajek a baby shower with a clown during class since he's retiring after this year anyways and with every passing day you can tell that he cares less and less until the last day of school where we could crash a fucking Mustang through the window and he wouldn't give a shit. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 01:41 Apr 25

No lets get sysrq arrested cuz he doesnt know how to play and then we can tease him and send him postcards while hes in prison lets get everyone arrested and have a party.   Le Cejak • <Apr 25, 2008 [2:07]>

How about we get the clown arrested and he can party in prison by himself and then you, me, and Boomer can go have our own party with alcohol but not invite that other guy because if he knew we had alcohol he would so tell on us? Or we could invite him and then just take his money and hire two clowns to party with us. Then we get Cajek preggers but then get all mad at him and call him a slut even though it's our fault and then he gives birth to a clown and we have another party. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 11:56 Apr 25

Or we can all go to clown school and become clowns and then party a lot and get into turf wars with the mimes and we'll throw water balloons at them and smear their makeup and make them look emo and then we'll all laugh and pile into our itty bitty clown car and drive away into the sunset. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 02:11, 26 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, let's make all that happen. And then we plant our clown seed into Cajek and make posters with a picture of him taken when he was caught off guard and making a weird face and post them all over the school so that even those fat kids who have such terrible, disgusting acne coated faces and shoulders will take pity on him until we kill the fat kids, get Cajek an abortion on his birthday, and have a party with clowns even though we're already clowns. ~Minitrue Sir SysRq! Talk! Sex! =/ GUN • WotM • RotM • AotM • VFH • SK • PEEING • HP • BFF @ 02:26 Apr 26

Enough of this nonsense!

I could not but help noticing that there appears to be some sort of, shall we say irregularity on the current top five reviews table. I mean if this dude chap Orion does just a few more reviews then, well... MrN9000 would appear to be fading from view. Fading I tell you. Just what exactly is going on here? I mean, what's a guy supposed to do? Maybe some kind of protocol should be introduced to prevent such possible eventualities? Also, I'm trying really hard not to mention the recurring theme from SysRq above involving planting seed into Cajek. Is that how SysRq got so far up the list when poor o'l MrN is teetering on the brink of obscurity? MrN 21:10, May 23

You, good sir, appear to have spelt my name wrong. And I am not a 'dude', I am a man of a certain soffistication and shall like to be reffered to as such. /tosses ascot back over shoulder and leaves Have Fun! MuCal. Orian57|Chat|Chuckle|PEE List|Awarded|UnBlog| 23:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)

Crumbs. You appear to have caught me with my trousers down old chap. We had better not tell matron... I never was a star at spelling. MrN 23:48, May 23

/me enters, stern look on me's face WOT? WOT IS ALL THIS HIBBLE-DE-BIBBLE??!!?!!?!!??111   Le Cejak • <23:51, 23 May 2008>

MrN had a good, long ride on the top 5, but was unceremoniously booted off. /me points and laughs, and then collects myself.   Le Cejak • <13:12, 25 May 2008>

From the maintenance box

• Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/User:Thekillerfroggy/Regent by Hype. Fine. --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 10:48, Jun 3 Further comment: TKF wasn't actually happy with the review and reverted it, but I still think it was decent, and stand by this rating. Anyone want to double check it? --SirU.U.Esq. VFH | GUN | Natter | Uh oh | Pee 11:36, Jun 3

CAJEK APPEARS! That review that TKF reverted looked pretty good, actually...   Le Cejak • <15:11, 03 Jun 2008>

It's been reverted back now by Hype himself. I thought you were allowed a second request on the same page? Also, this looks...I dunno. (reffering to the formatting of the maintenance box. ~~Hv) ―― Sir Heerenveen, KUN [UotM RotM VFH FFS SK CM NS OME™] (talk), 3/06 15:25

You know, I put in half an hour on that pee review - that's a full 3% of my waking day - and I'd hate to see it vanish completely. Why doesn't he just put up a second request? I might want to reference that review sometime... for example, I expressed some similar thoughts on Uncyclopedia:Pee_Review/socialist_alternative_(australia), and that author found them helpful and changed the theme of the article. --Hyperbole 16:31, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Sorry if I'm not allowed to comment here (feel free to move the discussion to a more appropriate page) but I think the review looks fine if a little short. Also I don't really think that "there's so much" line is useful. Quite a lot of Uncyclopediac articles have hate at their centre! - [18:59 3 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

The review was OK. TKF, just wanted another review and that's fine.

11:33, 3 June 2008 Thekillerfroggy (Talk | contribs) (522 bytes) (Thanks for not being helpful. Can I get another review please?

Based on this comment, it's obvious that TKF has not read UN:PRG recently and is not aware of the fact that we like people to submit again when they want another review. Why Hyperbole felt the need to be so aggressive in his reply:

15:09, 3 June 2008 Hyperbole (Talk | contribs) (3,667 bytes) (If you want another review, start another fucking request)

I have no idea. Calm down Hyperbole. MrN 19:18, Jun 3

Calm down both of them! - [19:33 3 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Well if I had politely asked for another review, and then was talked to like that I think my reply might have been similar to that used in TKF's latest revert. Anyway... TKF, Please create a new Pee request as per UN:PRG. We prefer this as it allows us to keep track of our reviews. Hyperbole, I advise you to comment about this no further. Also. sausages. MrN 19:39, Jun 3

Well, I'm going to comment about this further. I spent quite a bit of time writing what I believed to be a helpful review. I thought the best advice to make the article funnier was to tone down the hate, and I specifically listed the 11 places that I saw that hate. That's pretty much as constructive as I imagine the review could have been; as I mentioned, there weren't any problems with the prose to hammer out, and the only reason I didn't laugh was that it was too angry.

"Thanks for not being helpful," along with obliterating half an hour of good-faith work, is not a polite response in any way. Like probably everyone, I've had pee reviews I didn't find very helpful, and I didn't find it necessary to leave a nastygram for the reviewer and revert his work.

And so now we start in on the ban threats: "Also, I'll ban you motherfucker." Being bullied by admins this way is exactly the reason I left Wikipedia. So I hear you've got a user atrophy problem? Gee, I wonder why the fuck that is. --Hyperbole 19:56, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

Well, Damn my eyes. When I read "Thanks for not being helpful" I thought it said "Thanks for being helpful" which I'm sure is what TKF meant to say anyway. Why I got involved in this I have no idea. It was a good review. Who has my walking stick and slippers... MrN 20:06, Jun 3

Yuh, don't blame this all on Hyperbole, you edit-conflicter! They're both in the wrong, don't want to make anyone feel like they're being singled out or anything. We love everyone, etc. Also, as you let's move on. - [20:09 3 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Was that the impression I was giving? I do apologise about that. Obviously everyone got out of bed on the wrong side today. Obviously had I actually read the revert message properly I might not have embarrassed myself so much... MrN 20:13, Jun 3

I'm really not clear on what I did wrong, other than using profanity in an edit summary (oooooooh). And, yeah, I am still pretty pissed that my review is about to be overwritten. If you don't want to hear people's opinion of your work, what the hell are you doing submitting it to PEE? --Hyperbole 20:17, 3 June 2008 (UTC)

The point I have been trying to make here is that a one word difference in an edit summary can make a lot of difference between how people react. Which is kinda silly. Rather like this is becoming actually. Hopefully TKF will read this and put the review back as per UN:PRG. If he does not, don't worry Hyperbole... We know you did the review, and it will be recorded as such on Cajek's list. If TKF does not revert the review just link to the history of the page if you want to reference this review in your Pee List. It's not worth getting into a revert war over this. Enjoy. MrN 20:28, Jun 3

Bloody edit conflicts! Yes, swearing isn't in itself particularly bad. However using it as insult towards others can turn things nasty. But hey, you're only human and sure you're gonna get pissed, so that's fine! Now, since I've had the last word, we can drop this. Yeah? - [20:41 3 June] Sir FSt. Don Pleb Yettie (talk) QotF BFF NotM RotM UNPotM UGotM CUN PEE SR UnProvise

Yes. HeHe MrN 20:44, Jun 3

Soooo...

Since TKF requested a new review (even if he didn't go about the "right" way of doing so), and, you know, it's still there and all, I'm taking it. It really doesn't matter much, I just think I may as well say so and possibly start a flamewar. We need some more excitement. Unsolicited conversation Extravagant beauty PEEING 17:48, 9 June 2008 (UTC)

Purple Maintenance!

Hey, but I liked the purple top bit to the maintenance box...It livened things up! - [15:32 8 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie

Yettie! Go and edit Gay dammit! MrN 15:50, Sep 8

I think the lawn green from my talk page would look niced to be honest. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 16:18 8 September 2008

Oh, it's you. I would never have guess. :P MrN 16:24, Sep 8

PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! DOWN WITH GREY! UP YOURS WITH PURPLE! NOT THAT MINE IS PURPLE... PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! DOWN WITH GREY! UP YOURS WITH PURPLE! NOT THAT MINE IS PURPLE... PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! PURPLE MAINTENANCE THINGY!!! DOWN WITH GREY! UP YOURS WITH PURPLE! NOT THAT MINE IS PURPLE... YEH! - [17:01 8 September] Sir FSt Don Yettie

Green, dear. Your penis is green. SK Sir Orian57Talk RotM 17:24 8 September 2008

Uh...

Can we update this list now? Prettiful please? BlueYonder - CONTACT

I dunno, you miss a day due to being off work ill and convalescing in bed, and this is what happens... (Done, unless you meant update in a different sense?) --UU - natter 08:46, Nov 8

Note

The "Bin Crimes" review is an old from a while ago. I just fixed a formatting error in it. --Mnbvcxz 16:04, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Oh, I'd have noticed that when I got around to checking it, but thanks for mentioning it. Right now, it's 5pm so I'm about to unleash my famous Fred Flintstone impression and get the fuck outtahere! --UU - natter 17:10, Jan 27

But your sig says it's 10 past 5... Are you staying for some 'etra curricular' activities? Like chess club, not sex, that's not what I was implying at all. ~Orian57~ ~Talk~ 17:47 27 January 2009

Ok I'm asking!

I'm supposed to ask you to put me on the Pee list. I got two Golden Shower Awards from two previous RotM and they said my reviews didn't suck. So can you add me to whatever, please? DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 03:06, October 1, 2009 (UTC

UU added you before I could, the dastardly fiend. --ChiefjusticeDS 09:44, October 1, 2009 (UTC)

Mwahahahaha! Also, technically you shoulda asked on the PEEING page, rather than adding yourself directly to the list, but you meet the requirements and I'm cool with that - welcome on board! Now, join in with our "2 reviews each" weekend this weekend to help us blitz the queue back to nothing, please! --UU - natter 10:29, Oct 1

I found out I moved too fast--sorry! Sometimes I get excited and don't think about what I'm doing. Like that guy, whatever his name is, I met last week and we got married. I think we did, I'm not sure because I was drunk at the time. Ok just kidding. Really, sorry! Also I did one Pee Review this month already, but weekends I'm not here. I really have to focus more on school, but will try! DAP Dame Pleb Com. Miley Spears (talk) 01:06, October 2, 2009 (UTC)