User:Mitch 1 2/VFD test

DO...

For nominators: DO...

1. ... Find articles that suck by checking here, here and here. Many articles avoid the police for years before someone trips over them.
2. ... Read Uncyclopedia's deletion policy to make sure the article is eligible. If you abuse VFD you will be abused with the claw-end of a hammer.
3. ... Check the page-history! It may have been vandalized or just edited by morons. If so, find a better version and revert to it.
4. ... Add {{vfd}} to the article. Failure to do so may result in hemorrhoids. You have been warned.
5. ... Vote and include a comment as to why you have nominated the article.

For voters: DO...

1. ... Edit the section for the article you are addressing.
2. ... Pick a space under the appropriate heading (Keep, Delete, Comment), adding your sig/comment, preceded by a '#', like so: '''#'''This article isn't funny. ~~~~
3. ... Remember to sign and timestamp your vote with four tildes. Unsigned votes will be removed and their owners defenestrated. You have been warned, again.

For Administrators: DO...

• ... Allow 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
• ... Remove and archive closed nominations from the voting page.
• ... Delete any unused images from deleted articles. If necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Delete any broken redirects left behind.
• ... Add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page if it is kept.

DON'T...

• ... Revert administrators.
• ... Re-nominate any kept article for at least a month. If you do, you will receive a bollocking.
• ... Remove ANYTHING from VFD if you are neither an Administrator nor a designated Poopsmith. If you do, you will be banned for a very long time.
• ... Increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20. Violators will receive a free 1-day ban. This means, do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes look like this (after the page's deletion), and closed nominations look like THIS to indicate that they have been kept.

VFD: Where bad articles go to get recycled.

Pages for Deletion

Make sure that you have read the rules (above) and the deletion policy. Please don't nominate Main Page or Votes for Deletion; that joke has been done so many times we might just beat you with a nail bat before we tear our hair out in frustration. This also applies to Featured Articles and Uncyclopedia In-Jokes.

---

How to quickly find VFDable articles (using special pages):

• Check Special:DeadendPages, Special:LonelyPages and Special:UncategorizedPages. Often many articles can slip through the cracks of ICU or QVFD and remain on Uncyclopedia for very long periods before someone randomly stumbles upon them. Editors sometimes also keep useful lists on user subpages.

---

Notes for Administrators:

• Allow at least 24 hours before closing a nomination or deleting an article.
• Remember to delete any unused images from deleted articles and, if necessary, check what links to the article and remove any backlinks. Make sure to delete any broken redirects created as well.
• To avoid confusion, try to remove closed nominations which cause the page to exceed to 20 articles.
• If a nomination is kept, please add {{Oldvfd}} to the article's talk page.

---

To add an article, edit this section, and follow the directions in the comments.

---

Don't flood VFD full of articles, or at least leave a space between your nominations.

If you increase the number of articles on VFD to over 20, you will be blocked for 1 day, no exceptions. This means do not increase the number of active votes on VFD to over twenty. Inactive votes are shown with either a red link (where they have been deleted), or with the Closed nomination tag to indicate that the article has been kept. You have been warned.

Please remember to check an article's history, in case of recent or long term vandalism, before nominating an article. Also, check the article's talk page and 'What links here' for prior nominations. If the article has been nominated before there will be a link from a VFD archive page.

---

Food court

Keep
Delete	Del33t. -- Big, long, unUNunfunny list - User:Slavemaster2 - 6:19 AM 23 November 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 11:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Veronica Mars

Keep
Delete	Del33t. -- Teh show sucks, and so does this article. - User:Slavemaster2 6:14 AM 23 November 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 11:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Kraken

Keep
Delete	Delete. Cthulhu is way better. -->:( 10:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 10:50, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 10:54, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Quake the Game

Keep
Delete	Delete. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 09:43, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 09:46, 24 November 2007 (UTC) I cut the big list out, and it's still decidedly blah. Delete. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:02, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Human trawling

Keep
Delete	Delete. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:48, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 08:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. Seems pretty pointless to me. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Canada–United States relations

Keep	Keep, poor spelling aside, it's adorable. Like me, but less so. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 10:00, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:46, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 08:49, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. Pointless drivel. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:41, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Nathan Fillion

Keep
Delete	Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:44, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. -- Mitch 08:45, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. It's a pretty handy rule of thumb that if an article mentions someone being born in the year 1337, it's likely to be rubbish. This is a good example of that rule. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:40, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Gary Coleman

Keep
Delete	Delete. Crap. -- Mitch 08:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete - I see some value in it, but it would need a complete redo. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:39, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. Pretty terrible really. Some shining examples of random and the obligatory unfunny trivia list. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:37, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. Focus! Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Winnipeg, Manitoba

Keep
Delete	Delete. Hate cruft article mixed with some crappy lists. -->:( 03:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC) 'Delete'MrN 04:05, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 08:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:35, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. The second I saw it had a section called "Winnipeg's gayest rappers" I should have stopped reading. I continued. Oh dear. Listy towncruft and a waste of time. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:35, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. I've been to Winnipeg, and it's way less interesting than this. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 09:56, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Condoleezza Rice

Keep
Delete	Delete. A shitty article mixed with some randomness, facts and a bunch of crappy pictures. -->:( 19:52, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete Per above. Damn I have a hard time reading this due to the excess images. I placed the appropriate tag on the page stating it's a image whore. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 01:53, 24 November 2007 (UTC) DeleteNaa thanks MrN 04:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 08:30, 24 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. We should really have a page on her, but not this randumb image speckled hash-up. --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:32, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Halo 3

Keep	Weak Keep I like the page in its current form done by 116.240.230.186. I would say delete the history before that edit becasue the version before is the recreated Deleted page. If this one dies in this vote, please add it to the UN:CVP, due to the constand recreations. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 08:12, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Week Keep Moderately decent. I fit was huffed, it would just get recreated, only it would be dumber. --THE 18:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Delete. Recreated 14 (I think I counted wrong, whatever, I'm tired) times and this article has had no improvements whatsoever since I had put it in ICU (which was 4 weeks ago). -->:( 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Plasma Bombardment - Nah it's pretty shit if you ask me. Also that is the actual plot...So it spoils it (Bonner) (Talk) Nov 23, 08:28 Delete. -- Mitch 13:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Die -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:33, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete Could not detect any jokes here MrN 17:58, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete Video games are just not amusing. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:16, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:35, Nov. 24, 2007 Delete. Gamecruft - not the very worst example, but the usual "it wasn't as good as I was hoping so it's shit" drivel. Consider CVP as it will be back... --Sir Under User (Hi, How Are You?) VFH KUN 09:28, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

World Wrestling Entertainment

Keep	Keep. It's no Stampede Wrestling, with the congenial ring announcer Ed Whalen, but it's still got large men hitting each other with chairs. Sir Modusoperandi Boinc! 17:46, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Keep It's a nice article here but there's a problem with Red Links. Fixing those would help. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 19:04, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Keep Why deleting it? I see no reason to delete it. --Dekabreak 19:51, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Keep Agrees with Dekabreak MrN 18:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Ugh ~ Jacques Pirat, Esq. Converse : Benefactions : U.w.p. 22/11/2007 @ 17:38 DELETE This is an ugly listy sprawling metropolis of wrestling spunk. mAttlobster. (hello) 19:19, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Delete-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:09, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete - Looks like a bunch of lists to me. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:35, Nov. 24, 2007
Comments

Christian rock

Keep	Not that bad. It's got cleverness in it, just a bit lacking in execution. Maybe tag it with rewrite/soft. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 16:39 Nov 22, 2007 Keeeeep Jesus always was a dirty coke snorting rock fiend. Gets a but listy at the end but you have to take the rough with the smooth don't you. mAttlobster. (hello) 21:03, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Keep Just. MrN 18:03, 23 November 2007 (UTC) w33k k33p --THE 18:44, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Keep per above I agree with them. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 01:58, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Delete	Del33t - Mainly just a big list with little substance at the top. User:Slavemaster2 - 11:09 Am 22 November 2007 Delete-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:08, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Delete -- Hi, hey! I'M A MOTERFUCKING NIGGER BITCH LOVER 16:35, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments

Airline Management

Keep	Keep - Not too bad. Besides, RabbiTechno's deletion reason isn't even a valid deletion reason, and the rest of you haven't bothered to give a reason as usual. Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 12:53, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Keep I think this needs shortening, but there is amusement in here. It's well written but a little wandery. mAttlobster. (hello) 13:21, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Keep. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 16:36 Nov 22, 2007 Keep Need pictures though. ----Pleb- Sawblade5 ( yell | FAQ | I did this ) 19:07, 22 November 2007 (UTC) Weak keep-Razorflame (contributions) Talk 01:00, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Keep: It's certainly an above average article, not that that says anything given the average article but I did find a few pieces of it somewhat amusing. --Sir gwax (talk) 09:39, 23 November 2007 (UTC) Weak Keep - Some minor rewriting, a little expansion, and some images could really help fix this up. --Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 08:41, Nov. 24, 2007
Delete	Delete. Nothing wrong with it, as such; but it's been around for a year and a half with no significant humour development. RabbiTechno 20:23, 20 November 2007 (UTC) Delete. -- Mitch 01:09, 21 November 2007 (UTC) Huffage     EugeneKay wuz here (whine thank)   03:25, 21 November 2007 (UTC)   Delete --General Insineratehymn 14:58, 21 November 2007 (UTC) 'Delete'MrN 00:40, 22 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments	Comment - Is not having an edit for a year really a good reason for deleting something? You say that there is nothing wrong with the article. Conniving 22:30, 21 November 2007 (UTC) OK, fair point. The article just struck me as really rather boring and, since Uncyc is supposedly a humour wiki, that's good enough reason to put it to VFD as far as I'm concerned. Seems a few people disagree and the article may live - that's why we have democratic vote. :-) RabbiTechno 19:55, 22 November 2007 (UTC)

Insert Article Here

Keep
Delete	Delete. I have to test this thing. -- Mitch 13:43, 24 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments