From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: Tom Paine
|
Score: 15
|
| Nominated by:
|
Sir NoNamesLeft CUN NotM 04:16, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
|
For: 16
|
- Nom and for. This article is really funny and took a lot of time and work. Sir NoNamesLeft CUN NotM 04:16, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
 For - Pamphlets all in this bitch. -- Kip the Egg  Talk Works 05:33, May. 31, 2011- sure --
  Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB   06:41, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- For. —Sir Socky
   (talk) (stalk)  GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:24, 31 May 2011
- For -- The Zombiebaron 17:13, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For. sho'! User:DJ Mixerr/sig DJ Mixerr 20:14, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
- For. History gives me goosebumps. Look at my arms! Goosebumps (or maybe just the measels). Aleister 2:08 2-6-'11
- For. A little long but you really nailed this concept and milked it for all its worth. Dr. Fenwick 07:04, June 2, 2011 (UTC)
- lol. --Black Flamingo 21:11, June 4, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Yeah Funnybony
   06:02, Jun 5 06:02, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Sycamore (Talk) 18:25, June 5, 2011 (UTC)
- Maximum For
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  21:33, June 13, 2011 (UTC)
- For. It's brilliant. It just needs the Wikipedia template moved up to the introduction. I tried to do that, but I can't figure out the table. --
 Sir "TheSlyPony" Invariably certifiable. Rap sheet. [[::File:Sexy_twilight.jpeg|His shameless obsession.]] 23:39 June 18, 2011 (UTC)
- For. Mimo&maxus 10:08, June 19, 2011 (UTC)
- For. I suppose I'll support this five year effort. That one pic is actually a painting that took me 2 1/2 years alone.--Imrealized ...hmm? 16:19, June 23, 2011 (UTC)
- For. More liberal liberties taken with an historical fiction title than Assassin's Creed, bloody INVENTORY THUMBNAILS, and WHY is this beauteous game not featured? BTW, if actually produced this would make a much better addition to the
RockstarRevolution Games pantheon than would LA Noire. For serious.  KUN VFH POTM VFP(IMAGES⇔TALK) 21:07, June 24, 2011 (UTC)
|
Against: 1
|
- Against. A reluctant against but I don't think the intro has properly set up the rest of the article enough to want people to read further. I think it is an edit or two away from being featured. Sorry.
 RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate) 11:38, May 31, 2011 (UTC)
- Don't be sorry. I'm just happy to see the excellent work you're doing on the Robespierre article. It's good stuff. --Imrealized ...hmm? 04:10, June 6, 2011 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
For - Pamphlets all in this bitch. 
