Uncyclopedia:VFH/MORE KITTENS!

Article: MORE KITTENS!	Score: -1.5 MORE KITTENS!!!
Nominated by:	^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 02:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC)
For: 4.5	SN+F - Okay. Last nomination until the current ones die down. This one I really like.-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 02:16, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Boner. You had me at KITTENS! Madclaw @ ^talk 20:34, 19 February 2013 (UTC) This is a nice page. Scary stuff, look at kittens. Well put together too. Gonna have to go with a yep vote on this one, except for the kittens. No more kittens! Aleister 00:49 20-2-'13 For. 72.230.217.138 06:33, 20 February 2013 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 11:52, 24 February 2013
Against: 6	Against. This misses out on the extremely relevant point of fuckyeahpugsincostumes.tumblr.com/. But having said that, this is a fairly unfunny, meme driven article that is badly formatted. Nominally Humane! 12:24 20 Against. Mainly the formatting issue, covered in all caps and screenshots (which are itself not good imo) that arent formatted very well. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:47, 21 February 2013 (UTC) Against. What Frosty said. Against. Equilateralperil 15:00, 22 February 2013 (UTC) Against. Stupid. -- MagicBus Hello? Is there anybody there? 12:28, 24 February 2013 (UTC) Limp boner. -RA HB 02:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC)
Comments	Comment. yeah, stop at 9 nominations. can you give up nomming for lent or something eric? Leverage (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Leverage (talk) 19:31, 19 February 2013 (UTC) RAHB said it was good to nom a lot if there was like 13 total nominations. Speaking of something, Leverage would you like to collab sometime?-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 19:42, 19 February 2013 (UTC) Comment. I get that, but I think, like Wotm, there is vote fatigue. I still think we should only nom if we LOVE an article. If you feel like you need to say something defensive, like "please don't vote against this" , or "well I think it's pretty funny" it's probably not good enough. As for collabs, I am up for it in principle. I don't like forcing things, like I said before, but if there's something that tickles us both, of course. Leverage (talk) 10:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Leverage (talk) 10:50, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Yes, I should have mentioned to Peasewhizz when I was saying that, although I figured that it was just implied, that nominating when nominations are low is a good thing, but don't just nominate something for the sake of it. Search out and find the articles that really make you laugh and you think strongly deserve feature and that others will feel the same, or look at the list of quasi-features. Unless it's a joke nom because I love joke noms. But only one joke nom in like, every so often. Penis. -RA HB 02:45, 26 February 2013 (UTC) (From above) Badly formatted?! Are you kidding me? Puppy try using another browser.-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 14:42, 20 February 2013 (UTC) Taking the response elsewhere… Nominally Humane! 03:13 20 Feb If you'd like to fidget with the formatting to your pleasure it'd be appreciated.-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 15:15, 20 February 2013 (UTC)