Uncyclopedia:VFH/Friends with Benefits

Article: Friends with Benefits	Score: 3 Friends with benefits
Nominated by:	^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 02:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC)
For: 8	SN+F - I think actually this is my best work I've ever done.-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 02:43, 21 February 2013 (UTC) For. I like this. MadMax (talk) 02:55, 21 February 2013 (UTC) For -- Kip the Egg Talk Works 02:58, Feb. 21, 2013 For. Clearly if MadMax can vote for this, I can vote for this. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 10:42, 21 February 2013 (UTC) For. ShabiDOO 02:14, 22 February 2013 (UTC) For. categories should go in alphabetical order but meh Madclaw @ ^talk 17:15, 24 February 2013 (UTC) For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 10:54, 25 February 2013 For. Clearly if Socky can vote for this, I can vote for this. Aleister 14:00 2-3-'13
Against: 5	Against. Equilateralperil 04:01, 23 February 2013 (UTC) I actually thought you'd like this.-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 19:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC) Against. — (talk) (contributions) 01:57, 6 March 2013 (UTC) >.> Okay. But for bettering myself, I'd like an explanation for this vote and a suggestion? SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 02:24 3.06.13 Against You can't keep demanding explanations just because someone votes against your billionth self-nom of the week. This one has good bits but is woefully under-polished. mAttlobster. (hello) 18:42, 6 March 2013 (UTC) Okay, I understand. However, this isn't my billionith self-nom of the week. I don't just self-nom anyway. Thanks. SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 22:10 3.06.13 Limp boner. It's very difficult to read. The grammar is woefully under-developed, the narration is childish, and it's only really "saying" like two things, but each of them takes like two paragraphs to say it. The Abraham Lincoln joke, for example, is evident immediately when it's mentioned that if Abe and Booth had this relationship, that was the reason Booth later decided to kill Abe. Except the article takes another full paragraph to explain this, and uses none of that space to actually make any new jokes. It's just dragging the concept along, filling in space with more empty words. Other issues include Peasewhizz's trademark over-use of hyperbole as a substitute for creative humor. Sorry man, I actually think this is one of your least-polished :/ -RA HB 01:24, 8 March 2013 (UTC) Against. Mr N 04:54, Mar 10
Comments	Comment. I like a lot of this, but it keeps descending into Aimsplode. mAttlobster. (hello) 08:50, 23 February 2013 (UTC) What do you mean?-- ^SIR Peasewhizz de NY Biblio HOS Awards 19:07, 23 February 2013 (UTC)