Uncyclopedia:VFH/Crescendo

Cabal Decree #125/aaa! "No VFH Dramas" is now in effect. Any further discussion on this page other than votes For, Against or Pie will result in wide spread bans and public flogging at dawn.

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Crescendo (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Crescendo	Score: 14 gradual increases
Nominated by:
For: 18	Nomination and a vote for featuring the article. Saw this on pee review and was all like, haha, I should nom this. So I did. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 21:01, Jul 30 Weak For. I didn't know how it would do when I reviewed, and cautioned against VFH, but it has my support if it is here. ChiefjusticeDS 21:15, 30 July 2009 (UTC) For. Great article. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC) For. Loved it. Lal at "not crescendo". • Spang • ☃ • talk • 23:12, 30 Jul 2009 Godspeed ye! Black article. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 23:35, 30 July 2009 (UTC) For. Sir Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 06:15, Jul. 31, 2009 For. InMooseWeTrust 10:49, 31 July 2009 (UTC) For. Clever, well executed. -- unreliable Ape (seizure) (Riot Porn) 01:15, 1 August 2009 (UTC) For What I expected. That's not a bad thing. ~~ Sir Ljlego, GUN  [talk] 02:47, 1 August 2009 (UTC) For You make a man want to speak Spanish. Como se llama? Bonita, mi casa, su casa! Shakira Shakira - kingkitty ~Fuck you~ For No one in IRC would tell to vote against this. MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:55, 1 August 2009 (UTC) For. Per Romartus. -OptyC Sucks! CUN13:29, 1 Aug For. That last picture caption brought out a laugh IRL. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 21:26, Aug 1 For. –Flashfreez 23:45, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Very For. —Unführer Guildy Ritter von Guildensternenstein 00:30, 2 August 2009 (UTC) For. Good article, well expressed, I think it deserves a feature. El Sid, the lazy one • parlez-vous franglais? 16:22, 2 August 2009 (UTC) for. SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 14:36, 3 August 2009 (UTC) for--I'mthedaddy 16:04, 3 August 2009 (UTC)
Against: 4	Against. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 03:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Against. Sorry, but it was just a laborious read for me. Nameable • mumble? • (UnScr:PWotM) 20:01, 31 July 2009 (UTC)  Against.. I can see this one huffing and puffing to get to the punchline. Is that deliberate ? If so it makes it less interesting and not a VFH contender.--RomArtus*Imperator ® (Orate). 21:16, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Sorry, but a bit too long.--You know what the music means... Our time is up. 14:23, 2 August 2009 (UTC) That is, coincidentally, exactly what she said. - T.L.B. WotM, UotM, FPrize, AotM, ANotM, PLS, UN:HS, GUN 15:41, Aug 2
Comments	Care to clarify your vote, Acrolo? -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 04:55, 31 July 2009 (UTC) Sure :) Didn't enjoy the article. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:17, 31 July 2009 (UTC) That's not a clarification, that's a snide rewording. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 05:29, 31 July 2009 (UTC) I can see youre trying to turn this into a personal matter, but doesn't VFH state that you should not take critisism personally? If I had been personal then you would have a reason to single me out here but My vote is perfectly valid. Now I did not enjoy the article simple as that. Sir ACROLO KUN • FPW • AOTM • FA •(SPAM) 05:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC) The fact is, a number of us have noted your tendency to vote aginst really good articles, and in favour of utter shit, and it's fucking up VFH. Romartus even more so. -- unreliable Ape (seizure) (Riot Porn) 01:23, 1 August 2009 (UTC) So, who likes my Early Cuyler "Breathe if you're horny" trucker hat? MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 01:30, 1 August 2009 (UTC) Terrific! —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 13:57, 1 August 2009 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---