Forum:Shameless Bashing

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Forums: Index > Village Dump > Shameless Bashing
Note: This topic has been unedited for 6442 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Mmm, ED bashing :)

http://blog.wired.com/27BStroke6/index.blog?entry_id=1553329 --Chronarion 23:46, 10 September 2006 (UTC)

See also:

How long before this starts to be picked up by mainstream media, I wonder... --66.102.74.29 02:43, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

Once that happens, we may eventually have a wikipedia article calling them a shock site. Then they will be way down. Good find. --Sbluen 02:57, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
You know what could be funny? If our new Uncycloversity Fighting Sophias had a sports rivalry with the Encylopedia Dramatica Tech Lulzes in Making Up Oscar Wilde Quotes. Fans would fill Oscar Wilde memorial stadium and we'd beat them every time. Crazyswordsman...With SAVINGS!!!! (T/C)
Honestly, really, really, nobody would care. Spang talk 07:50, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Well put spang --Atomsk.gif Kaizer the Bjorn takkun Nya? (nya nya) (1961 model!) Check out T61! 12:36, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

At least someone's put some original material up on ED, however actionable it may be. Freemorpheme.gif 09:58, 11 September 2006 (UTC)

I can't wait until someone kicks his head in. "ooh, the intarwebz is so anonymous, I can fuck with strangers" -- Sir Codeine K·H·P·B·M·N·C·U·Bu. · (Harangue) 11:35, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
Strangers that might be sociopaths who can trace down his IP and find his address and locate him in real life and kick his butt or worse. Oh well, I smells me an UnNews story on this if someone is brave enough to write it. :) --2nd_Lt Orion Blastar (talk) 17:56, 12 September 2006 (UTC)
Not me, I fail at writing (and maybe life) --Roger The Bum Full sig! CLICK HERE!!!!!!!! 02:18, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

The MSNBC story worries me. It never mentions ED by name, but does describe the site as "a Web site devoted to parodies and satires online." Which is giving ED way too much credit, for one, and for two basically describes us. What if people start to associate our name with it, since we have a much more visible profile? Anybody else concerned about this? -- Tinymooose.gif » Sir Savethemooses Grand Commanding Officer ... holla atcha boy» 02:05, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I was bothered by that, too. I'm glad I wasn't the only one that it jumped out at. I didn't mention it because I didn't want to sound paranoid... That is a very poor description of ED and it's actually a description of us. Their Alexa rank that shot to nearly 1000 has been dropping like a rock, too. But they are already pushing it falsely as a reason their site is worthy of inclusion on WP and claim it means they are more popular than uncyc. We're still looking for a clean uncyclopedia way to bring people to our land of satire and parody (except I wanted to spoof a news reporter and interview some media whores, but that got shot down). Dawg.gif » Brig Sir Dawg | t | v | c » 04:09, 15 September 2006 (UTC)

I'll probably go straight to Hell for suggesting this

In my opinion, the funniest thing we could do with this is to make a parody of it called RFJesus CL Experiment, in which a "ChristsList" user named "Jesus" invites people to respond to this posting:

i have everything that i need at my church....that is where we will pray....no 
exceptions............. we will pray at my church...got it??????????

...And so on, and then there's this big deal about all the "drama" this causes, and how it starts a whole new religion, and then goes on to list all the people who replied, all of whom are major religious figures in their own right, such as all Twelve Apostles, Martin Luther, St. Thomas Aquinas, and so on, and at the end there are repostings of IRC channel logs where Jesus is chatting with various people, etc., etc., etc.

Beyond that, I really wouldn't worry about any of this negatively affecting Uncyc - after the initial blitz of empty legal threats are dispensed with, this will be forgotten about in 2-3 weeks, maybe sooner. Nobody ever actually sues anybody over sexual peccadilloes, I'm afraid, even if actual laws are broken, as in this case. There's just no future in it, and unfortunately, this jagoff and his ED pals know that all too well.  c • > • cunwapquc? 05:28, 15 September 2006 (UTC)