User talk:Orion Blastar/Archive6

Alright

Ok, I'll start a completely different article like the George Dubya Bush version of the U.S. president's article. I might not do it right now though. Also I'm gonna remove the picture I uploaded for the new article. Quadzilla99 20:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

That is the spirit. Let Weri write the article the way he wants to, and you write a new article the way you want to. Just look out that it don't get VFD or QVFD. If you get a NRV tag, try rewriting part of the article so it is funny. Use the {{construction}} template on your article so the admins know to leave it alone for a week or so before they stick a NRV or VFD or send it for QVFD. If it is really funny, it won't be deleted. Good luck. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 21:05, 12 January 2007 (UTC)

French liberals

I’ve started off the section about French liberals on the liberals article but I don’t know much about what happened during WWII or much else about France for that matter. Do you want to have a go filling it in?Weri long wang 15:28, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

Well I could. I know that France surrendered and the allies tried to liberate France from Germany. I'll have to do more research on it later. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 16:00, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

WIP move notice

Hey, your article that was called Bullshito has been moved to User:Orion Blastar/Bullshito for futher development. Feel free to move it back when you have done. Thanks. —Braydie at 22:38, 23 January 2007 (UTC)

Hey maybe I can apply for a Poolit prize or something? --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 02:53, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Yeah that would work. —Braydie at 07:56, 24 January 2007 (UTC)

Dealing with Un-vandals

Hello again. I wanted to ask you about Uncyclopedia's procedure for dealing with dedicated vandals. For example, see 124.187.8.196 (Talk • Contribs (del) • Block (rem-lst-all) • Whois • City • Proxy? • WP Edits • Checkuser). What do I do with this guy? Other than complaining to an admin buddy, that is... --Medvedev ^(scream) 12:55, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Well after reporting them to Ban Patrol see if you can restore the edit from the vandalzition by copying text from the prior edit into a new edit and take out their vandal text. You could write on their user page, giving them a note that vandalizing is not tolerated on Uncyclopedia. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 18:31, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

I am fairly familiar with the revert function from Wikipedia, it's the local customs (e.g. warning templates) I'm not well versed in. Thanks for the link! --Medvedev ^(scream) 21:32, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Ah I don't know what the warming templates are. I know there is a welcome template but that it should only be used for registered users and not IP addresses. I think the admins stick on warning templates, but I am not sure if users should do that as well. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 22:00, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

That's okay, I'll use my imagination. Like I said - thanks for the link, I'll just adress the "Ban Patrol". --Medvedev ^(scream) 22:40, 2 February 2007 (UTC)

Liberal talk page

This probably isn't important, but there seems to be a lot of weird edits between two IP addresses on the liberal talk page. It seems meaningless, and I think it might be appropriate to interpret it as vandalism and delete it. What do you think? Weri long wang 20:58, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

No, sorry, I'm wrong; one IP address. Very bizarre. Weri long wang 21:00, 4 March 2007 (UTC)

I reported it to Ban Patrol the other day. I got it on my watch list. It appears to be someone starting a flamewar with themselves. I think it violates guidelines. ZombineBaron agrees with us and the IP won't be back. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 20:30, 5 March 2007 (UTC)

It's better late then nevers

I missed your UnBirthday by two days...but hey...it's the thought that counts.

Happy Second UnBirthday!

You have now officially been an Uncyclopedia member for two full years. Heaven help us.

---

-- The Zombiebaron 23:36, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I missed my UnBirthday as well, so don't sweat it. I am just trying to figure out why I am still here. :) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 00:10, 31 March 2007 (UTC)

New Rewrite tag

What do you think about instead we adding more suboptions (Trump, Simon) we add them as random options of the soft, medium or hard options? -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 21:34, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmmm, maybe, unless people want a certain rewrite tag to go with the theme of the page or something. I am going to add the Ermey rewrite tag and then quit adding tags. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 21:35, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

This is just for disencouraging people in loading the template with too many options. Where do you want your options to be shown? -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 21:36, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Hmmm, maybe Trump for weak, Simon for medium, and Ermery for strong. Based on the order of their meanness. ;) --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 21:39, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Check it out now. Seems like I found a solution. -- herr doktor needsAgear  [scream!] 21:57, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Thanks, looks great! --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 22:05, 10 May 2007 (UTC)

Brazil

Hey, fella, since you are our conservative (or kind of) option here, help me out with this one. This rewrite received very negative reviews and I'm suspecting this was due to political differences, liberals conceding piety privileges to loser countries. Something like "please, don't make fun of my retard brother". -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 22:01, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

I will do what I can, but often the left-wingers get angry and attack me when I write something making fun of left-wingers. I'll see what I can work out of it. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 22:15, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

Thank you. In case you become curious, the flamewar at pee review. -- herr doktor needsAcorpse  [scream!] 22:16, 1 June 2007 (UTC)

It looks like they are from Wikipedia and have a "funny because it is true" mentality and want accuracy on the war, etc. They don't know that some stuff is funny because it is exaggerated or made up as long as it is consistent. I tried to make some changes. I think the whole Brazilians are dumb bit is offensive to them, and perhaps the part of the different races is also offensive. I think the article is funny, but I need to research Brazil a bit more to see if I can learn if some of the other parts are funny. I think the main thing is that it is written in the way a Foreigner sees Brazil and not a native citizen of Brazil sees Brazil. I think that may be their strongest criticism of the article. They seem to think that parts of it are sarcastic, but I wouldn't know that until I research Brazil a bit more. --Lt. Sir Orion Blastar (talk) 01:41, 2 June 2007 (UTC)