User talk:Orion Blastar/Archive3

New BOOK!

As you were kind enough to comment on my idea for the oscar wilde re-write (Which got deleted after 2 days! Although i supose i should be thankful it stayed up that long.) I'd like your opinion on how to improve this: UnBooks:Araby Its a pardody of the James joyce short story Araby. I think the opening sentences are too weak and need better captions for my pictures.

Any help would be greatly appreciated.

--Winstanley1 22:01, 23 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll look and it when I get a chance. I am bust fixing one of my computers at home, and I just reformatted my laptop. I was busy with the Asperger Syndrome debate that I couldn't even work on most articles or repair my desktop that got .Net 2.0 updated and turned the whole system into a 286 speed system that no programs can be removed or installed on. I never read the Araby short story, but if it is on the Internet somewhere I can try to read it and see if I can help you. For the Old Priest, try a picture of the Crypt Keeper for the Uncle try Drunken Uncle Google image search is good for finding pictures like that. I have family matters to attend to with my wife and son. I have to go now. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 00:19, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Ok, I read it and found a summary of Araby on the Internet. A name-less boy meets a lot of fustration, and tries to go to a bazaar in Dublin to try a buy a gift for a sister of a neighbor, but his uncle comes home and might not let him go, and when he does go the uncle only gives him a little bit of money. I tried to spice it up a bit make it funny. The pictures are more scary than funny. As for the Oscar Wilde contribution, I guess people would have had to read his works and do some thinking to get the jokes, so the uneducated had them deleted. You got scary pictures, but what you need are scary campy pictures like the crypt keeper, or for the uncle try Uncle Fester from the Addam's Family, or Steve Ballmer that looks like Uncle Fester but is more popular. I think the UnBook needs some Pop-Culture references to mix in with the story, so people who haven't read the book can find it funny as well. Maybe Cheney Fester can add some popularity to the article? Part Dick Cheney part Uncle Fester, he seems to fit that Bad Uncle description a bit. Either that or Nick Nolte who has that crazed uncle that drank some turp look. I added in kitten huffing and the preist's porn collection (because real preists are not supposed to do those sorts of things) and the penguin reference to the scary nuns that run the Catholic school that the boys escape from. I think it adds a bit of flavor to an otherwise scary and serious story. I'll try to add in some more to make the intro about the preist a bit funnier and if I find time to add to the Uncle part. Let me know what you think about the images, they need to be funny in some way. Good luck. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:49, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for your help you made the opening section much funnier! That part about the nuns was great. I replaced the picture of the uncle with a picture of uncle fester, and changed the caption, i'm going to re-write the introduction for the preist. I'm thinking of insterting this section:

'The former tenant of our house, a priest, had died in the back drawing-room. I could tell he was dead, because he smelt even worse than usual. I remember that day well, I was visiting the preist for my weekly confession, during which I would be forced to admit my ‘guilty sins of the flesh’. Last week I told the preist I had once seen a woman hanging out washing, he condemned my ‘vile lust of the eyes’. And said I was a wicked depraved child, who Jesus would watch with extra vigilance. He asked if I’d ever been naked. I told him I had. ‘Nakedness is sin!’ He screamed, ‘I myself have never been naked!’He told me I must say 500 Hail mary’s 86 our farthers, and pray for the death of 26 protestants. He asked if their was any other, depravity to witch I would confess, he seemed exited at the thought of deprvaity and I could see him drool slighty as he spoke the word. He had that creepy look in his eyes, the look he gave alterboys as he locked the church doors for the start of choir practise. I said I thought church was ‘a bit dull’. He foamed at the mouth, and made the sign of the cross. He called this ‘adultery of the soul,’ and said I would go straight to hell that afternoon, unless I was very very sorry, and gave him five pounds. I gave him the money and he told me I must now say 900 Hail mary’s 600 our fathers, and pray to saint partrick to end my ‘Depraved phallic lust’. He said if it didn’t stop soon I would end up a degenerate pornographer, I would go blind from wanking, and choke on my own whisky.

I think the section where he steals the candle stick needs to be funnier i'll try and think of something to improve it. Heres the origional short story : http://www.classicshorts.com/stories/araby.html

--Winstanley1 21:22, 24 October 2006 (UTC)

Thanks for the praise on Anonymous Slashy!

Check out the response on my user talk page. --Naughtius Maximus F@H Woof! MeowMUN 02:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

About that whole AS thing . . .

Just wanted to note that things got totally out of control in that forum page, and I think it happened because, like I said in the forum, most of what happens to me in life is completely out of my control, and in a real way, uncyclopedia is the only place where I actually have some real freedom. And when someone comes into the VD threatening to take that away because they're offended, I find that selfish, and, right or wrong, it angers me. People are entitled to find that childish or whatever, and maybe it is, but that's sort of where I am right now. And I'm sure if people were more honest with themselves, they'd admit that they have something in their life that they use to feel free and express themselves the way I use uncyc, and if someone tried to interfere with that, they'd probably have the same reaction.
So, to make a long explanation short, I'm sorry about what happened, but I'm not sorry about why it happened, and I'll take the same stand to defend uncyclopedia from being censored by another random ip in half a second. It's funny how slashy never really explained why we should drop the AS page when we all noted that we'd have to drop every page that could be construed as offensive, other than to say "People with AS are more important because they're emotionally stupider" or whatever. It's amazing that he/she/it/both/whatever is apparently unaware that is a bigoted, anti AS attitude, as is the position that everyone who didn't agree who identified themselves as AS affected was faking it. As if anyone would fake having a mental disability, like it was a good thing to have . . . . really really sick, this one. --Hrodulf 18:11, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

i agree with your thought on what uncyc. can be: a source of fun, alternate (harmless) obsessions to help one unwind/live and a place to express your creativity in. and yes, people are terrified; scared about admitting this. they flush toilets before dropping a turd so that others can't hear them empty their bowels. but, yeah, you put the whole thing quite nicely. -- mowgli 19:51, 26 October 2006 (UTC)

I felt it was best to move the talk with Slashy to the VD and see what others had thought. I asked Slashy to apologize for vandalizing pages and debate with logic and reason rather than get all emotional and get into flamewars. I didn't expect him/her to, but I thought I'd give him/her that choice and see if they took it. Slashy shot himself/herself in the foot as far as I am concerned, and 90% of the mockery on the forum page was directed at Anonymous Slashy and not Asperger Syndrome because of Slashy's abusive and trollish nature and acting like an asshole. Anyway Slashy gave me some more material for bad grammar and I think gave a lot of people here a chance to vent their spleens at Slashy and get some stress out of their system. Sadly a few people did start to agree with Slashy that we rename the article or VFD it to see what happens, but when Slashy went on an emotional rampage he/she lost any credibility he/she had left. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 00:50, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

The Great Aspie War of Ought Six

Please dive right in! As soon as it's goodly enough, we'll move it to the main space.  Sir Tooltroll, Esq. CUN • Eh? • Oh! • UnTunes! •• I my cat! 12:33, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

Science argument

Please can you read my rebuttal to your accusations on the liberals discussion page. I placed them here because it is so long it would clog up your page. – Preceding unsigned comment added by Weri long wang (talk • contribs)

You aren't even capable of signing your comments, and I used up all my patience with Anonymous Slashy this month and past few weeks. If you refuse to use logic and reason and critical thinking, then you have no business in science. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 19:21, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Charming, as ever. Why don’t you read my less than emotional argument and explanation correctly? Sensible rebuttals to all you snide, facetious, uncouth and incorrect comments are provided in a polite and calm fashion. And by the way I forgot to put my signature down. Anonymous comments aren't much use when the user provides a link to his own talk page!!!!!!Weri long wang 19:29, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

It is; however, an example of how you ignore rules like signing a message. I used words you would understand at your level of thinking. You are starting to make Anonymous Slashy look like Albert Einstein now. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 19:35, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Scientific American? Three things: 1) I’m 19 years old 2) I haven’t discovered anything new, I was just writing an article, which has been deemed as “good” about a biochemical structure and 3) I only mentioned it as a rebuttal to your continuing acusation that I’m an uneducated idiot who knows nothing about biology.

I don’t know what “You are starting to make Anonymous Slashy look like Albert Einstein now.” Means but I’ll assume it’s an insult. You’ve already accused me of being incapable of distinguishing between two thing; so now I’m going to accuse you of being incapable of distinguishing between break the rules and forgetting to put down four symbols. Again anonymous comments are best put without a direct link to the user page of the Peron that wrote it. Kind of defeats the purpose of an anonymous comment doesn’t it.

Also I am capable of understanding civil and polite argument on your part. I’m not used to being spoke to like an Iraqi in Abu Graib and there’s no need for it. Thank you. Weri long wang 19:52, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

There is no need for you to carry on and play the part of the victim, when you've been lobbing bombs at me for the past few days. As for me, I'm not a victim, I am a survivor. Survival of the fittest, and you are not fit enough, so go back to Wikipedia where they put up with your nonsense. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

How does it feel? Well since all I’m trying to do is discuss science I’m kind of indifferent to it. You’re the one who is passionate about the subject. Just because I’m 19 doesn’t mean I’m less intelligent or less knowledgeable than you and again, if you believe that, you can say that politely. If you believe your right and are not amenable to argument I’ll leave you alone. I thought I’d try to have a civil talk about science, which I’m very passionate about, but there are plenty of blogs where I can do that and get sensible responses. And be spoken to like a human being too. Thanks for your time. Weri long wang 20:00, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I only treat people as human beings who treat me as a human being first. If you want a serious article or discussion, go back to Wikipedia and rejoin that sockpuppet circle jerk over there that you like so much and get so much attention over. All I tried to do was make suggestions to make the liberals article funnier and you are the one that started to go off topic and insult me, religion, and anything else you could think of. I have yet to see you be sensible or use logic or reason or critical thinking. I want to note that I've laughed throughout the whole thing, because I wrote with sarcasm, satire, and humor, like our flamewar guidelines say to on here. You are the only one upset over it, maybe you need to spend more time studying for your college classes than messing around on the Internet with anonymous humor wiki sites. Apparently your reality check bounced!--Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 21:37, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

A new one: accusing me of faking my own Wikipedia barnstar! Did I fake all my work and the good article promotion too? Pathetic jealousy. On the subject of speaking to each other I've not said a bad word against you. The only reason you're speaking to me like a piece of dog shit, is the same reason Ted Haggard spoke to Richard Dawkins on his documentary: because you've been brought up to be a religious xenophobe. You're parents and mentors told you that they, and you are better than anyone who doesn't agree with the views you hold. Educated university students and, in the case of Richard Dawkins, educated university professors from Oxford who specialize in evolutionary zoology, who tell you you're wrong on the subject of evolution aren't, can't be right.

Yes you have said a lot of bad things about me. You said a lot of bad things about groups I am in, or about me indirectly as well as directly. On Uncyclopedia I've respected other people's views on religion and I think I told you that you have a right to whatever views you want. I am not trying to force my view on you; however, you are trying to force your views on me. Then you claim you are better than me because of Wikipedia and some stuff you wrote there like it was the most important article of all time. I never claimed to be better than anyone, and most of it is due to my mental illnesses. You have a right to your views and opinions, but I have a right not to agree with them, or find flaws in them and make fun of them. There is no jealousy, I wrote to Wikipedia as well, many do, then I got wise and joined up here because it was more enjoyable and not full of self-important arrogant article writers who cite sources and paraphrase, yet cannot fully understand the words they are writing at on Wikipedia. I said that evolution is flawed, like Newton's theory of gravity was flawed until Einstein found the flaws and made corrections. That does not make it wrong, and it does not make another theory right because of it. Something can have flaws and still be considered right, like a spelling mistake on a research paper is a flaw, but the paper could be correct. You still do not understand my views and opinions and you are writing them into stereotypes that you hold on religion people that you read on a pamphlet that tells how to argue evolution with a religious person. Yes I was handed out pamphlets like that when I learned evolution. When I was 19 I was agnostic and thought I knew everything like you, I was in the top 2% of the college, so I know a lot of where you were coming from. It lead me to a lot of stress, and it caused a lot of mental illnesses that forced me to quit college for a bit, then go back, and try it again. So unless you've lived like 38 years in my life, you are not even qualified to comment on me. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I feel pity for you. I thank the aluminiferous ether that I'm open-minded, polite and educated. I respect other people’s religious views so long as they keep to themselves. All I ever tried to say was intelligent design is bullshit. I’m glad the Republican judge appointed by George W. Bush, John Jones agrees with me. Why don’t you go and argue with him instead? I'm sorry you can't cope with the truth; I’m glad I can. One last time: which university did you study at? You, in your unending charm have told me my university is crap, so how about yours?

I don't want or need your pity. Save it for yourself, because you are going to need it in later years of your life. You are not open-minded, polite, and you are just starting to earn an education. You learn the basics and theories, but no real world theories, no real world experience, no real world knowledge, and had everything handed to you while I had to work hard and earn real world experience, real world knowledge, learn real world theories, and got skilled and earned a very good salary. You haven't even started your career yet, and you claim superiority already? Bahaahahaahahaahah! Still cannot find my resume yet I see? Never bothered to read my user page to see the link to it? I said you weren't bright enough to do that, and now you've proved it. Can't even research the people you are arguing with, can you? You don't respect my views, and I've yet to see you respect anything but your own views. As if your views and opinions are the only ones that matter. Still cannot grasp that I never said evolution was wrong, that in itself is laughable that you still think that. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 22:27, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

It’s not wrong; it’s just laughable. Right.Weri long wang 22:42, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

Yes Evolution is laughable. This is Uncyclopedia not Wikipedia, things are supposed to be funny here. Once you accept that fact, you'll fit right in. Laugh, laugh, or you'll go insane. --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 23:02, 31 October 2006 (UTC)

I'll apologize now and say that I was wrong. I don’t know how we even got into arguing about the validity of neo-Darwinian evolution in an article about liberals. I still stand by my beliefs and I don’t approve of your snipes at me or my university, but I want to stop this argument now. I’m sorry for arguing with you and I’m sorry if I’ve insulted you. I can assure you that I go out of my way not to purposely insult people. Can we stop it and get back to making jokes about liberals and PETA? Once again I’m sorry for arguing with you and I’m sorry if I’ve insulted you. Let’s just end this now. Weri long wang 00:10, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

Apology accepted. I apologize for making fun of you and your college and Wikipedia contributions, etc. It was all meant as jokes, and I was not being serious anyway. I respect that you stand by your beliefs, and you have a right to your views and opinions, even if they are different from mine. I hope that you learned that Uncyclopedia is not Wikipedia, and at times we are not serious here, even on talk pages and forums. I'll write it off as a Halloween prank or something. :) --Lt. Orion Blastar (talk) 02:23, 1 November 2006 (UTC)

It is amazing what an apology can do isn’t it? Anyway I’m sorry for continually arguing with you over something so trivial and meaningless. I’m sorry if I appeared to question your personal views or tell you that your views are wrong; I’m always saying that that is wrong and I don’t want to appear to be a hypocrite! I just wanted to clear up some of the things you said about me and science on the liberal discussion page. That’s all in the past now so we’ll just put the whole thing down to me being possessed by my personal god Athe on all hallows eve. I did post my apology 10 minutes after all hallows day started – the amount of time it took to get my soul back into my body. Weri long wang 00:21, 3 November 2006 (UTC)