Talk:Fish in a bucket
idea[edit source]
Just noticed how much this sounds like John Wayne might have written it. I'm just saying... --Smrt-guy 00:16, 20 March 2007 (UTC)
I know I said I was going to expand this on pee review, but I found that NeoZidane did a sound file and I liked it so I'm putting the sound file on and keeping it as is. Short and sweet is better anyway... --So So 14:49, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
From Pee Review[edit source]
Now, this isn't feature material, but I simply don't think it deserves NRV. I don't plan on changing it into something totally different either. I'm not asking for a score so much as an "NRV" or "not NRV" verdict. People that understand subtle/absurd humor only, please. --So So 01:46, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- The speaker (presumably a fisherman) derives unreasonable enjoyment from fish specifically in a bucket. I can see how some people would find this funny, although it's not a gut buster. Keep, and maybe slap {{Style joke}} on it. --Alksub - VFH CM WA RV {talk} 08:52, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
- Yeah, I wasn't really aiming for the gut either, so... But I'll wait to see if there are any more comments before I take the liberty of removing that ugly NRV. Thanks. --So So 09:59, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
Humour: | 6 | I had a hard time assessing the humor content of this article. It is quite funny if you read it the right way, but perhaps its style should be made a bit more clear. Try adding the {{Style joke}} template to it, and perhaps renaming the sections or the whole article, if needed, to something like "Memoirs of Fish in a Bucket"...you know. |
Concept: | 8 | You could do basically anything with "fish in a bucket". The fact that you chose to write it as a re-telling of a man's childhood memories with what he considered to be the best thing since sliced bread is a new approach to it, but it seems to work for this article. |
Prose and formatting: | 8 | The prose is appropriate for this kind of style, but my only suggestion would be to emphasize the speaker's narrative, reminiscing voice a bit more, such as more pauses when necessary, some off-topic rambling. You know, so the whole thign isn't jsut Fish in a Bucket. Gives the story some depth, I think. |
Images: | 6 | The images are decently-captioned, I'll say that much. Thank goodness for Google, though. |
Miscellaneous: | 5 | Remove the "some people" section and get rid of the bullets. They make it look like a list, which it isn't; it's a narrative. |
Final Score: | 33 | As a final thought, add a couple more sections, and I think you can take away that NRV stamp. |
Reviewer: | --Señor DiZtheGreat CUN AOTM ( Worship me!) (Praise me!) (Join me!) AMEN! 20:49, 25 January 2007 (UTC) |
Thanks for the thoughtful critique. I'm going to follow most of your advice and fix it up some later. But I think I want to keep the name of the article and sections as is, as I think it emphasizes the limited mental capacities of the speaker, who just assumes everyone will know what he's talking about. Thanks again. --So So 00:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
Humour: | 8 | Very funny to me, but I have an odd sense of humour. It's funny for the same reason that Snakes on a Plane is funny. And the content is pretty good, too. A fisherman rambling about fish in a bucket... |
Concept: | 9 | "Fish in a bucket" is basically a throwaway concept to work with. Most unencyclopedic topics are crap, except for a few. You somehow managed to make it fit, although its title is not encyclopedic, its style is unencyclopedic, and so is everything else. |
Prose and formatting: | 6 | Rambles a bit, but would be better if it rambled a lot. But not "ADD rambling", more like "your grandfather" rambling. "Ah, those were the days", if yuo know what I mean. |
Images: | 3 | The images look like the first 5 results of a Google image search. And do you really need more than 2 tops to illustrate the concept of "fish in a bucket"? |
Miscellaneous: | 4 | The formatting is rather odd, especially the avalanche of templates at the bottom and the seemingly random placement of images. |
Final Score: | 30 | It's great so far. Keep up the good work and churn out a couple more sections. Hell, if you could work out all the kinks and make it long enough, I would nom it on VFH. |
Reviewer: | ~ Unflameviper Who's a Peach? 02:10, 26 January 2007 (UTC) |
If it was long enough...
- Glad to hear there are some other people out there that appreciate unconventional humor. I'll apply some of your suggestions as well. (But those really are the best I could find image-wise. On a Google image search, of course...) --So So 03:03, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I'm not sure if one more positive vote helps any, but I laughed my butt off reading this article, and was shocked to see that it had an NRV. It doesn't deserve one at all. --Wehpudicontok--Welcome to Vaporstory! 06:26, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
- Thanks! "Every vote counts", or something... --So So 07:35, 26 January 2007 (UTC)
I thought this was funny--when I saw the title, I knew I had to read it. It would benefit by lengthening, thereby making it look less like lists. I like the narrarator's voice and the blunt simplicity of the idea.--Shandon 18:47, 28 January 2007 (UTC)
- Got it. I don't think this would be good as a long article, but I will lengthen it out a bit to about medium size. Thanks. --So So 03:28, 29 January 2007 (UTC)
Praise[edit source]
Very funny. Now scuse me, I'm gonna go get me some Fish in a Bucket. --Whhhy?Whut?How? *Back from the dead* 11:16, 23 March 2007 (UTC)