Talk:Déjà vu

hehe...funny shit...good work dude--Danvan 12:20, 21 August 2006 (UTC)

I'm sure I've seen it before somewhere. -- Sir Mhaille  (talk to me)

It was better before as per ME. Sir Cornbread's version that is. 11:57, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, if people seem to prefer the nearly-dead-end page, I won't be one to stand in their way. -- Rei 14:14, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

It seems like that is indeed the case, so please stop reverting it. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:35, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Dead end and infinite loop pages are bad. Actual links to other actual articles should be added. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 03:38, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

They used to exist, up until recently, when Zork removed them. Now, for some reason, Sir Cornbread is taking credit for Zork changing all of the links to point to Deja-vu. Shall I RV? -- Rei 18:41, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

I would prefer the non-infinite loop version. Making all the links the same doesn't add much to the article anyway. I'm not saying there shouldn't be any to deja-vu, but there should be more to other actual articles. Probably. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 20:10, 10 October 2006 (UTC)

Get your facts, Rei. In June, I changed all the links to Deja-vu, and Zork L simply thought my version was better or something. Its just like the Recursion joke or something...Thats a dead-end and thats ok...-- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:44, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Of course -- because it takes an utter genius to think of something like pointing all the links to Deja-vu. It makes so much more sense that Zork dug through ancient history in the article, found your version, thought it was stunning, then recreated it (not an RV) in modern times -- rather than thinking of the obvious and re-implementing it. -- Rei 15:19, 11 October 2006 (UTC)

Whatever he did...Bottom line: My/his version are WAY funnier than yours, and you're just pissed that people seem to agree. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 03:03, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Where are these mythical agreeing people of yours? -- Rei 06:35, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

I'm protecting the page because the reverting is irritating. Talk it out here like adults and then ask me or another admin to unprotect it. —rc (t) 06:44, 12 October 2006 (UTC)

Eh, I dont even care. I still have Deja-vu which is funnier and has my edits intact. And read the votes on VFH and weep, Rei. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 00:28, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

"Read the votes on VFH and weep"? Are you having fun in your own little imaginary world? There was one (read: *one*, 1, uno, ichi, single, -1 * e^(pi*i)) vote to support you, by User:Tom_mayfair. Seriously, this is getting almost scary -- first you credit yourself with brilliance because someone went for "your version", assuming that someone dug through ancient history of the article to resurrect your version, yet didn't RV to it. Then you seem convinced that there's this landslide of support for "your" version, and your own references don't back you up. Are you on medication? -- Rei 16:44, 13 October 2006 (UTC)

Well, seeing that L nominated the same idea that I had I think that counts...You're just pissed because you wrote a self-reference article that isn't self-reference, and as such, nobody thinks its funny but you. Since you have a few old featured images, I'm sure you think you're hot shit Rei. But nobody cares. I'm dropping this off my watchlist and I wont even grace the inevitably infantile comeback you place here with a response. Here's an idea: write better. I'm done with this subject. Completely. Good riddance. -- Sir C  Holla | CUN 06:44, 14 October 2006 (UTC)

How did this turn into a discussion about *me*? You're the one trying to make this into a war of personalities. I'm just trying to create a good article here. -- Rei 01:05, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Hey, I think that means you win! I'll unprotect this now, shall I? Seeing as cornbread is done with it and all. • Spang • ☃ • talk • 05:02, 16 October 2006 (UTC)

Serias Irony! I had Deja Vu when I opened this article!!! o_0 No joke--Gondana 07:07, 2 March 2009 (UTC)