Forum:Banned for a Day: Re-Proposal

Forums: Index > BHOP > Banned for a Day: Re-Proposal

Note: This topic has been unedited for 4486 days. It is considered archived - the discussion is over. Do not add to unless it really needs a response.

Since everyone else is pulling out crap from the corners of their brains, I figured I might resurrect an awesome idea I had back in the days when we were men. Banned for a Day. The premise: Once in a quarter we ban one of our lowly peasants, from a range of helpful to the useless gobshitey, for one day. He/she/it/heshe/shit can be banned from doing absolutely everything if he/she/it/heshe/shit wants, from editting on thw wiki to flaming on IRC, or simply fucking shit up. If he/she/it/heshe/shit bitches about it, we can debate whether to ban them permanently in the future. If he/she/it/heshe/shit is an asshat, we can debate whether to op them or not ban them again. It's win-win for us! Unless, of course, the user never comes back to Uncyclopedia.

Come on, let's do it at least once! I voluntarily remove myself from candidacy to make a statement that I care only about the project, not my own will to be banned. It'll be like peeing on Cajek's grave! -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 10:52, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

GOATFUCK!!!!

LOLRANDOMLOLRANDOMLOLRANDOMLOLRANDOMLOLRANDOM!!!! --Scofield & The Machine 18:45, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

PISSS

-- Soldat Teh PWNerator (pwnt!) 19:53, Jun 20

Done

For seriously! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 22:44, June 20, 2011 (UTC)

Except you unbanned him after only 3 minutes. -- The Zombiebaron 04:20, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

He looked at me with those big puppy dog eyes! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 05:04, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

I was actually sleeping but ok, also note I said I remove myself from candidancy. -- Frosty dah snowguy contribs GUN PLEB 06:47, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Consider your voluntary removal remanded. 1234 ~ 06:59, 22 June 2011

I note nothing! Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 07:14, June 22, 2011 (UTC)

Voat should Modusoperandi give Frosty some cake

Score: 1

•  For. --~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:09, June 26, 2011 (UTC)
•  Against. Frosty's new sig looks ugly. And he never asked me to make him a new one. That is shame! -- Lollipop - CONTRIBS - WRITINGS - SHOP - Now adopting! - 03:16, 26 June 2011

Fnoodle roulette

Hell yes. What's more, if you make him a 'crat, not even admins will be able to escape the fury! – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:13 Jun 26, 2011

Sound good. Please do it. -- The Zombiebaron 03:23, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

Well, the only kink in the plan is that I'd need someone to 'crat my bot, and the only people who can 'crat are 'crats themselves, so we'd have to find and convince a 'crat to — oh. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:25 Jun 26, 2011

What would Fnoodle do with crat powers o_O --~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 03:26, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

De-op and ban admins, of course. – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 03:29 Jun 26, 2011

Well until we can convince some poor sucker to give 'crats to Fnoodle, you should at least make a user-only version. -- The Zombiebaron 04:38, June 26, 2011 (UTC)

I'm making this

Question: what should the random pool of users be? All users? Active users (that have edited in the past week)? Only users who sign up (to prevent unsuspecting newbs from getting a ban and thinking it's serious)? – Sir Skullthumper, MD (criticize • writings • critchat) 02:13 Jul 09, 2011

Ahhhh what? ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 06:18, July 15, 2011 (UTC)