From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
| Article: The Men in Blood-Stained Overcoats Who Stay Out of Sight, Waiting For Just the Right Moment
|
Score: 10 voters in Blood-Stained Overcoats Who Stay Out of Sight, Waiting For Just the Right Moment
|
| Nominated by:
|
MrN  17:59, Sep 16
|
For: 19
|
- Nom+4 Let's see how this one does... MrN 17:59, Sep 16
- for. this vote will protect me, right? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:38, 17 September 2008 (UTC)
- for --Greyweasel 09:07, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. 83.41.96.219 20:58, 19 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. Lamoxlamae 06:55, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. This will boost Uncyclopedia credibility no end. Style
 Guide 09:31, 20 September 2008 (UTC)
 SF Because I had fun writing it and, uh... hell, I dunno. Le Cejak • <15:58, 20 Sep 2008>- Big For. I liked this one a lot. Perfect paranoia article. • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 23:51, Sep 20
- For. I could see this on the main page. Meta 500 15:07, 21 September 2008 (UTC)
- Witt E, 96.239.70.176 00:11, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. 87.86.38.62 14:32, 22 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. Underserf 09:01, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. 70.60.136.163 16:56, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. Oh yes, I liked it. Gives me an idea to write a "hang on to your seat" spoof Cycle71 17:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. Amy Rose 17:51, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. I liked it!
 Admiral Enzo Aquarius-Dial the Gate  22:07, 27 September 2008 (UTC)
- + 24.220.243.254 15:06, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. 84.194.239.240 20:37, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- For. Made me laugh out loud. Catroaster 22:48, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- For Love it. --MegaPleb • Dexter111344 • Complain here 03:26, 1 October 2008 (UTC)
- For Pants wet. Geoffprickett 14:16, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
- For. JudgeZarbi
 TALK 16:15, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
|
Against: 9
|
- Per my review. Not enough changes were made for me. Oh Well. The Woodburninator (woodtalk) (woodstalk) 16:14, 18 September 2008 (UTC)
- Against. For some reason, this article
looked as ugly as fuck...um...just wasn't very pretty, to me. Love, 
- Against. too long, need a bit more edits, then yea KoRoBeNiKI 15:33, 23 September 2008 (UTC)
 Against. — Sir Sycamore (talk) 19:36, 24 September 2008 (UTC)- The title made me think it was really gonna Cajek me, but I scarcely Cajeked. I didn't like the "buy Uncyc products or die" angle. This could be way better if it took out that aspect and focused on unreasonable paranoic fear of men in overcoats. --S0.S0S.0S.0S0 13:56, 25 September 2008 (UTC)
- Against. As per So So.
 TKFU UUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK  00:20, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Meh Per So So and TKF. -RAHB 21:46, 28 September 2008 (UTC)
- Against. Sir Severian
  (Sprich mit mir!)  12:17, 29 September 2008 (UTC)
- Sorry Per So So. I was all ready to be Cajeked out like so many other times before, but the paranoia felt uncomfortable and what So So said about the buying products. So So So said it... So? --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent
     15:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)
|
| Comments
|
- Comment. I wanna see how this does before I vote. Thank you for the nom, MrN! Le Cejak • <21:18, 17 Sep 2008>
- @vampiregirl: what are you talking about? Le Cejak • <0:56, 23 Sep 2008>
- Abamastain: Formatting bugs me. All the images are on the right. Why are they on the right? Why? Fix this, get back to me, and I shall change to a for. Right now, I'm nitpicking. --Mr. Monkey
 Pant-hoot here. 00:05, 26 September 2008 (UTC)
- Abstain - Something stopped being able to decide one way or the other...I wonder who that might be--Knucmo2 10:59, 30 September 2008 (UTC)
|
VFH
← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH
Always check the feature queue first.
Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.
17:59, Sep 16
SF Because I had fun writing it and, uh... hell, I dunno. 
Against. — 
