Uncyclopedia:VFH/Segue: a monologue

Article: Segue: a monologue	Score: *8 snoozing authors saved by a watermelon. No! Don't get too close; it's seedless.*
Nominated by:	Sycamore (Talk) 13:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC)
For: 11	Nom + For - Very tidy article, funny and quality stuff throughout.--Sycamore (Talk) 13:50, 6 November 2008 (UTC) Have you seen my... For vote? • • • Necropaxx (T) {~} 17:29, Nov 6 For, obviously. It's one of those obsessive/in-character pages that still "works" months after I forgot what started it in the first place. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 18:12, 6 November 2008 (UTC) For, hey I laughed despite its attempt to make me crazy.-- Sir Claudius CUN VFH (carpe diem) 15:34, 8 November 2008 (UTC) For...watermelons in Nam! --Vana 01:58, 13 November 2008 (UTC) For. I seem to remember judgifying something to do with this. I seem to remember thinking it was good. I still do. Yay for consistency! --UU - natter 11:07, Nov 16 For. I always liked this one. I always liked you, too. No, not you. --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 20:36, 18 November 2008 (UTC) For. *Sir* Starnestommy (Talk • Contribs • CUN) 16:18, Nov. 23, 2008 For. I especially like how unusual it is, uncyc needs more weirdness! —talk 21:28, 3 December 2008 (UTC) For.-- Wait, have you seen my... comment? Ah here it is. Perfect-you can't get any better than a recurcive monologe, like this comment. Speaking of comments, did you see my comment? ~ ^{[Citation Needed is here. Let's talk.]} 08:32, 8 December 2008 (UTC) for. have you seen my...Gerrycheevers? SirGerrycheeversGunTalk 17:53, 8 December 2008 (UTC)
Against: 3	Against. I loved the last paragraph - there's definitely a feature hiding somewhere in there. But the other 80% of the article was just kind of meh to me. pillow talk 18:17, 10 November 2008 (UTC) Against. I don't get it...and I don't want to? IronLung 04:21, 14 November 2008 (UTC) Argh!!!. So many >s and <s!!! I can't be dealing with this! I just can't!!! McMajik - stealing yer face 'till the cows come home. 20:05, 9 December 2008 (UTC)
Comments	Abstain- I just didn't get it. Then again, I do have a rather "silly" sense of humor.--Mnbvcxz 22:37, 15 November 2008 (UTC) Stibby 'stain. Help me out here, I just don't really...like it. It's good, but it's not...that good. I dunno, I'm at a loss here. I love in-character articles (hell, most of my articles are in-character) but this one was just a little lacking for me. I can see how it's good, and yet I just didn't fall in love with it. sir sysrq @ 15:49 Nov 26