Uncyclopedia:VFH/Hiroshima

VFH overview

All nominations

Feature queue

Re-feature queue

Recently featured

Recently failed

Archive

Rules

Hiroshima (history, logs) (feature) (remove)

Article: Hiroshima	Score: 13 beautiful cities... OF DEATH
Nominated by:	T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:26, August 15, 2012 (UTC)
For: 13	It was the best of times, it was the worst of times. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 22:26, August 15, 2012 (UTC) Megatons of fun. Except for this line which I just don't understand: "Due to numerous inlets projected from the body of ketchup". Can somebody explain that to me? -OptyC Sucks! CUN00:36, 16 Aug Vandalism. Oops. -- T​K​F​​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​UU​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​U​CK 06:12, August 16, 2012 (UTC) Triple-testicular boner--Bp2611 13:08, August 16, 2012 (UTC) For. Winstanley1 (talk) 21:11, August 18, 2012 (UTC)  For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 21:36, 19 August 2012  ATOMIC FOR I do like this one. We should bomb it again. Hiroshima means "Fuck me sideways with a cement cutter" in Japanese. True. Aleister 11:45 8-20-'12 Blow it up! |Si Plebius Dato' Joe ang Giratina CUN|IC Kill | 11:16, August 22, 2012 (UTC)  For. -- Sir Xam Ralco the Mediocre 01:35, August 23, 2012 (UTC)  For. I really like this one. That is, I did like it until... -- GlobalTourniquet: UnAstrologer, UnJournalist, shameless narcissistic America-hating liberal atheist award-winning featured writer 01:48, August 23, 2012 (UTC)  RBX I DROP BOMBS LIKE HIROSHIMA. User:Matthlock/sig2 16:54, August 23, 2012 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 05:10, August 27, 2012 (UTC) For. ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 12:03, August 31, 2012 (UTC) For. 41488p (talk) 09:58, September 5, 2012 (UTC)
Against: 0	Against. Just didn't laugh Funnybony    14:59, Aug 22 Just because I feel same as Shabidoo is not a reason to vote against. So I'll abstain.--Funnybony    12:41, Aug 25
Comments	Comment. The article has a great ironic tone but I found it pretty confusing. I wanted to laugh but I couldn't grab onto anything that would feed me a LOL moment. Sorry ShabiDOO 19:44, August 16, 2012 (UTC) This is one of my pet peeves (I keep it in an aquarium and feed it garden toads) - that articles here should be lol. As I was misinformed, this is a satire site, and satire does not have to be funny, just satirical. Good political and historical satire is a mix of funny and ironic and other things. Just my peeve being let out of its aquarium for a walk in the woods. TFK still sucks, but has a satire bone that's getting better as it ages. Aleister 15:49 8-20-12 Ali...this would be all fine if the article wasn't trying to be funny...however...this article was trying to be funny...and for me...the article didn't acomplish what it was trying to do. If it was purely satire, ironic or sarcastic but not funny nor trying to be funny, I might vote for it. I would love to see more true biting satire outside of unnews. Ontop of that, there are other reasons why I wouldn't vote for it, but I found the "confusing" and "not funny" as very legitimate reasons to not vote for an article, and shared these two examples as constructive criticism, as all uncyclopedians should. --ShabiDOO 00:50, August 21, 2012 (UTC) Comment. I like this article, but it doesn't have a proper ending, or at least not to me. Otherwise I'd vote for.--Snippy 12:30, August 17, 2012 (UTC) Abstain. Per Shabidoo--Funnybony    12:41, Aug 25 Abstain. The article is funny but I find it pretty choppy. POP!GoesTheWeasel 05:58, September 2, 2012 (UTC)

VFH

---

← Back to summary VFH
← Back to full VFH

Click to feature this article

Always check the feature queue first.

---

Note: the queue slot won't be properly filled until the {{FA}} code (with correct date) is on the article.
Just follow the instructions if you're unsure.

---