Uncyclopedia:VFH/Forum:Article huffing (2)

Article: Forum:Article huffing	Score: -3 meds
Nominated by:	TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:08, November 14, 2011 (UTC)
For: 4	The original featurable forum. -- TKFU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U UU U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U U CK 23:08, November 14, 2011 (UTC) For -- The Zombiebaron 23:28, November 14, 2011 (UTC) For. It's funny cause it's Skullthumper on a big long rant even longer than my big long rants. ShabiDOO 00:05, November 15, 2011 (UTC) Extremely Strong For. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 02:24, 15 November 2011
Against: 7	Against any forum ever being on the main page. ChiefjusticeGameBoy 23:21, November 14, 2011 (UTC) It's mildly amusing, but I'm not going to vote for something mildly amusing to be controversial or avoid looking like a "prude". The problem with featuring forums isn't that they're forums - it's that the majority of them are not that funny. Seriously. Stop doing this, it's not edgy, it's just like nominating a bunch of bad articles. --HM (T) 02:58, November 15, 2011 (UTC) Dr. Skullthumper. --Roman Dog Bird 03:26, November 15, 2011 (UTC) We featured a forum on ?pedia once. It was funnier, though. Still is. Pretty sure the thing is stickied and only a quarter of the intended size, too. 1 2 3 4 ~ 05:17, 15 November 2011 Against. The other one was better ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 05:34, November 15, 2011 (UTC) Against. Lacks a sufficient quantity of me. I'm pretty awesome. Sir Modusoperandi ^Boinc! 00:33, November 16, 2011 (UTC) meh --Nikau 02:43, November 16, 2011 (UTC)