User talk:TheTechnoToast

Welcome!

Hello, TheTechnoToast, and thanks for joining Uncyclopedia! Before editing further, please take a gander at our Beginner's Guide. If you want to find out more about Uncyclopedia or need more help with something, check out the following pages:

• About Uncyclopedia and The five pliers of Uncyclopedia
• Help Pages - if you need help with a specific issue

Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~) or use the "sign" button () above the edit box. This will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, feel free to ask me on my talk page, ask at the community forum or in the chatroom, or ask an administrator on their talk page. Additionally, our Adopt-a-Noob program can bring experienced editors straight to you. Simply leave a message on an adopter's talkpage to join. I hope you enjoy editing here and being an Uncyclopedian!  ~Sir Frosty (Talk to me!) 23:08, July 13, 2012 (UTC)

This edit...

...didn't really work, so I've reverted it. It was okay, but wasn't funny enough that it justified the break from the context. Nominally Humane! 03:48 14 Jul

And this was just list cruft. I don't want to revert your edits, but I am earnestly asking that you read HTBFANJS before adding more content. Lists are generally unfunny, as is dropping in unrelated names (in this case, the prez). Nominally Humane! 03:34 15 Jul

Firstly, don't edit anyone's user page that's not your own. It is considered the height of rudeness. Secondly, all our policies have the "ignorable policy" note on them - it's a joke. Thirdly, no. If you read HTBFANJS beyond the lede you would have understood that I removed your edits as they were listcruft, which I have no desire to reinstate. Yes, there are funny articles here that don't follow the guidelines there, and I'd be happy for them to be ignored if the contributions were still funny. My opinion - which is not sacrosanct - is that these were unfunny. I'm happy to recreate the article - with your inclusions - at User:TheTechnoToast/Pot noodle, where you can edit and polish it to your hearts content, and once it's complete you can move it back to mainspace. I'd suggest you have it reviewed before you do that. If you have any concerns about this, feel free to ask an admin. Zombiebaron has been our longest serving admin still active (I think), and is known for being impartial, although ChiefjusticeDS is a good man when discussing article quality. Nominally Humane! 11:45 15 Jul

Don't try and be insulting. You're not very good at it. And I think you missed the part where I said "Thirdly, no", but gave you a compromise. Please, try and be civil, and understand I'm trying to be nice. Nominally Humane! 12:04 15 Jul

You do realise that editing another users userpage is not just rude, it's also ban-worthy. Stop doing it. I'm already regretting being polite. Again, try and be civil. I don't actually want you to be banned simply for being ignorant. Consider that I'm actually trying to make it easier for you to be here for a second. Nominally Humane! 12:24 15 Jul

A bit of a slow-your-roll, sir.

Hi! I noticed some of your edits, and I also noticed that you don't seem to be getting along with an established user. When an established user doesn't find your edits funny, he is free to revert them. When two established users don't find your edits funny, it's impolite to press the issue. It is also impolite to post messages on other users' main pages -- that is what talk pages are for. Remember, you are new here, and you obviously don't understand some of the rules yet. Please take a breath, remember that this is not personal, and remember to be polite to the other users, even if you think they are total douchebags who have a personal vendetta against you. Are we good? ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 13:05 (UTC)

---

Dear Bizzeebeever, I understand that I am not supposed to edit someone's homepage, but I wasn't aware of the talk section or how it worked. I had a very long conversation with PuppyOnTheRadio after he decided to remove some of my edits he regarded as 'unfunny'. Uncyclopedia doesn't work based on people's opinions, I'm sure lots of people would find my content funny. PuppyOnTheRadio referred me to an article stating what is stupid and what it funny (HTBFANJS) and I saw a notice on the page stating that it was an ignorable policy. When I asked PuppyOnTheRadio to restore my edits, he became increasingly rude and vulgar, to the point where he started to correct me on my comments, saying 'Don't try and be insulting. You're not very good at it.'. This came across as very insulting. I decided that the user was passive-agressive, and told him to 'face your anger'. He then claimed he was being 'polite' which was evidently not true.

In reference to your own comment on my page, I do find PuppyOnTheRadio a douchebag and his comments were indeed personal and passive-agressive. I suggest you monitor PuppyOnTheRadio, because he comes across as a karma killer and will stifle creativity.

I am not comfortable with users like PuppyOnTheRadio monitoring my every edit, smothering individualism, and will be leaving Uncyclopedia if no action is taken to curb his right to monitor work.

Regards,

TTT (TheTechnoToast, aged 16)

P.S. 'He's a complete douche knob spazz whose brain is, as-yet, incapable of distinguishing when he's being a douche, and someday soon, it may result in his getting a real good stomping from some guy who has the power to ban his ass, is my opinion. So I would just back away from him slowly, let his energy peter out, and then revert his edits.' If this is about me, I shall be leaving immediately.

Everyone monitors your every edit, kiddo. That's how wikis work. (See this page?) And he doesn't know you. I don't know you from Adam or Adam's husband Steve. IT IS NOT PERSONAL. So, like I said, please sit back, chillax, and learn the rules before you start claiming folks are stifling your creativity. We work hard here to maintain our already-pathetic level of humor. If you like, work in your "user-space". If you need help on how to create an article in your user-space, please ask someone. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 13:31 (UTC)

P.S. That is a private joke between Puppy and I. If you really want it to be about you, well, there's the door over there >>. If, on the other hand, you would like to be a productive, fun user on this wiki, then take my words above to heart, and remember that this is a place where we attempt to write jokes, not lists. ~ BB ~ (T) ~ Sun, Jul 15 '12 13:38 (UTC)

I see you are as pathetic as the other user. I find your comment pathetic, not very grown up and very personal. Obviously you are unable to maintain any sort of professionalism. Your arrogance is oustanding, this is not Private Eye, you need to get over yourselves and your massive egos. Little pricks shout the loudest. Truly not worth the effort.

P.S. Who the hell writes 'kiddo'? WTF!

Forgive me for kibitzing, but Puppy and BB have credibility with me on most issues, and especially when one of them asserts that an edit of yours is listcruft that should be reverted. Whereas you have demonstrated (most recently by trying to erase this discussion) your inability to even assert a position courteously. To-wit: Someone who disagrees with you is not, thereby, either pathetic, immature, or unprofessional. And your final appeal (I'm leaving and it's your fault) is not persuasive either. Spıke ¬ 17:46 15-Jul-12

Ironically, the comment more accurately describes itself than Bizzee's comment. —Sir Socky (talk) (stalk) GUN SotM UotM PMotM UotY PotM WotM 09:05, 17 July 2012

Exactly right. Spıke ¬ 14:07 17-Jul-12