User talk:Lakepoint
♥♥♥ I love you. ♥♥♥[edit source]
The reason for this being that I get to use this new and shiny template to say hi!! Yes, this does indeed mean I lied to you -- you smell and no one loves you. Anyways, you look like you could use a buddy. We're all good friends around here, so here's some important stuff to help you out!
- Beginner's Guide - this has lots of really cool stuff in it. I think.
- Our Vanity Policies - why we don't care about your grandmother, your gay teachers, or your dog.
- How to Be Funny and Not Just Stupid - how to be loved, even though you smell bad, and occasionally experience the uncontrollable urge to dance to 80's music.
If for some reason you you still want to find out more, these will help a bunch!
- About Uncyclopedia and The Five Pliers of Uncyclopedia
- How to Get Started Editing on Uncyclopedia
- Help Pages
One more thing! When you do stuff, remember to sign your name using four tildes or just that weird looking sign (
) button at the top of the little edit box thingy.
Anyways, I've gotta go practice being a fairy princess. Love,
Your edits[edit source]
Flammable gave you a short ban regarding your edits. Don't take it the wrong way; just have a look at the above links in your welcome message. If you have any questions ask me, Ethine, or Flammable on our talk page(s) (once your ban expires). Or if you feel so inclined, you may stop by the IRC. --EMC [TALK] 04:03 Aug 1 2010
Your ban[edit source]
....short wasn't it.... -- Sir Mhaille 
(talk to me)
On editing[edit source]
So the ban I gave you was a pretty short ban just to make sure you've read HTBFANJS, it's something that a number of users go through and it helps us stem bad edits and make sure that you've read the user's guide. I should also note, if you're going to do a lot of work on a page like that (slow, gradual), you should consider making the draft in namespace and then moving the final product, first asking for evaluation via Pee Review or asking a more knowledgable member of the site. Muslim is a fairly large page, and a dramatic, albeit slow overhaul should be done without creating versions of the page that are inconsistent and overly nonsensical--Flammable 00:36, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
- Oh, also, so you don't have to obsessively check Recent Changes for a response form Mhaille about namespacing:
- I'm willing to help you, you know. Making pages in namespace is pretty easy. Type into the addess bar: http://en.uncyclopedia.co/wiki/User:Lakepoint/<Your Article name here> replacing <Your Article name here> with the title of your article to be. It'll ask if you want to make the article, and just follow the link to do so. --Flammable 00:53, August 2, 2010 (UTC)
Your article[edit source]
I have moved it to here as the maintenance tag on it had expired. If you have any questions about this let me know. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 08:43, August 3, 2010 (UTC)
Your article![edit source]
The one on pee review. The one that's a list. I can't pee on it right now, I'm afraid, but I glanced at it and (without actually reading it properly, to be fair) it seems to be...well...a list. Usually, I would say, lists do not really make for a good, structured uncyc article. I understand that the article may actually have "list" in the title, but could you possibly pick a few of your favourite ideas and give them each their own heading and write a few paragraphs on them? I think that might be a good approach. Although, I wouldn't dramatically edit something like that while it's still on pee review. Still, whatever you want to do. If you want any help, I can. I might even get a chance to pee on your article tomorrow. Hope you're enjoying uncyc. - [19:39 5 August 2010] The•
- Also if it's a work in progress then it might be a good idea to move your article to your userspace, where it can't be touched by anyone. - [19:41 5 August 2010] The•
Again[edit source]
I have moved your latest article here as the ICU expired. Let me know if you have any questions about this. --ChiefjusticeGameCube 09:13, May 24, 2011 (UTC)
Dawn of War II[edit source]
I've reviewed your article. I'm telling you here because since it took so long I'm not sure if you'd notice otherwise. Again, sorry about that. It's like all our reviewers up and died. ~ 
18:01, 5 September 2011