User talk:Ianweller
Re: Recent Additions to QVFD: Indiscriminately copying & pasting dozens of links from Category:Worthless Articles could be considered borderline-disruptive. Please remember that these articles are already under review by established NRV procedures, and are not, en masse, eligible for QVFD (unless you are prepared to justify each one per your personal reviews of said articles). --DW III 
22:52, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
- Taken notice. I knew it'd piss off someone. IAN WELLER-- TALK -- F@H -- VFH -- VFD -- RAND 23:14, 10 February 2006 (UTC)
Swedish academy[edit source]
Expand not to be deleted? Expand where? If you want I can take away the last chapter about retired members. --{{User:Suresh/sig}} 20:12, 12 May 2006 (UTC)
Highlighter[edit source]
Why did you mark Highlighter as a stub? It's 6 sentences long, covers the subject, and includes an illustration. Tom Veil 21:13, 13 February 2006 (UTC)
T-shirt[edit source]
Heh...Every time i use the + button, i screw it up. Anyway, yeah... go ahead!! Also, if you want it personalized in any way, I'd be happy to do that as well. – Mahroww a.k.a. Hoyetii “Art” Emerson 00:22, 15 March 2006 (UTC)
NRVs and Deletion Policy[edit source]
Hi Ian. I noticed you've been marking several old articles as NRV. Normally I wouldn't mind, but it says in the deletion policies that "Older articles should not be NRVed unless they are borderline QVFD." Maintenence tags would be more appropriate in this case. Thanks! —Hinoa KUN (talk) 05:09, 22 May 2006 (UTC)
Apparently you didn't read this last time. Read it again. Removing maintainance tags and adding NRV tags to old articles is bad. Stop. 
Sir Famine, Gun ♣ Petition » 14:42, 1 October 2006 (UTC)
- Because next time, it'll be a ban. —Correspondent Hin Arash, PRAA
[TALK] [KUN] (17:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC))
