User:MrX/Geneva convention

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

The Geneva Convention (Chinese: This page does not exist) is a treaty made in the year 1949, year famous for this convention and opioid addiction and I think the two things correlate somehow. The convention itself promote a “fair” treatment of war prisoners and the moral obligation to wash and stay clean, moreover its protocols define what can be targeted and what not. For example you cannot target an hospital marked with a huge Red Cross, but you can target the same hospital only if “mistaken” for Osama Bin Laden headquarters. The convention took place in Geneva, nearby ethnic restaurants, where leaders and diplomats of half the world convene thinking to get a free pizza. The papers presented revealed the bad misconduct of Nazy German soldiers during WWII and someone argued that something has to be done about it, others simply stated that the pizza was never delivered yet.

History[edit | edit source]

The idea for such a treaty came from a Swiss businessman named Henry Dunant, he often visited wounded soldiers during his free time. He was shocked seeing how miserable the conditions of soldiers was, so he did what every influencers would do in these days… he wrote a book about it, titled: “[Wine stain] A memory of Solferino”. So he proposed a special agency that may help in war-zones and a governmental treaty to help neutrality of the agency during war-time. The Red Cross was then created (bombed soon after the first day of activities) and in 1949 on a particular foggy day, the convention was established, no one was looking forward to it because no one could see at all that day.

Contents[edit | edit source]

Flag of the Red Cross cropped as a square.png

Geneva convention:
Hereby We the nations convene on mutual cooperation to avoid the horrible treatments during war-time but we also concern ourselves about our summer-time… so We the nations decided:

  • 1]

We grant total immunity to war prisoners and by this we intend total! No more Guantanamo pls.
We grant the impartial treatment for all soldiers this include but not only: Communist yellow bastards, Korean pieces of shit, Italian motherfuckers, Nazy piggy animals and many more… […]
We grant total defense of civilians involved and aid to the wounded… by the way a “miserable” bullet in to the head is not allowed anymore! (I am looking at you America).
We grant recognition of the Red Cross symbol as a mean to avoid targeting of wounded or civilians but I remember to this assembly that a t-shirt with a generic red cross is not enough… ISIS did that once.

  • 2]

It will never be enough to say but here we are again, protect the wounded at all cost, if you have to kill to protect, protect twice killing both.
Although a warship cannot destroy/target an hospital one, it can always take medical staff and patients prisoners just for fun.
Neutral vessel can carry wounded and patient, neutral vessels cannot be taken hostage or prisoner otherwise we get angry, very very angry.
Protection for civil and religious staff must be given even if the priest talks too much at the homily.
The hospital ship are invulnerable for two turns.

  • 3]

Member and partnership regulations.
GTA 6 launching date and first mods.
Different kinds of “war prisoners” and their rights based on racial points.
Where to get racial points
Article 5 specifies that prisoners of war (as defined by racial points) are protected from the time of imprisonment to the time of liberation and if there is a doubt about the prisoner checking the skin would be mandatory and not racist.

  • 4]
[The same shit, different words]
Logo of Cambodian Red cross.png



Geneva Treaty
copy for smoking

Applications[edit | edit source]

The last thing everyone thinks during a war is prisoner so this make more clear how much people in war does not give a fuck about whoever fought against them. It is difficult to make this convention adopted by everyone, the Chinese leader laugh till commotion when proposed to sign this “incredible” piece of paper and he was not the only one. In the international organizations though, it is considered a pillar more or less like the Human Rights and Kofi Annan’s Instagram posts.

Internal links[edit | edit source]