User:Kwakerjak/1840 Election
“Tippecanoe and Tyler, too!”
– Whig Party on Whig political slogan, 1840
“O.K.! Get it? Old Kinderhook — O.K.? C'mon, that's got to be worth something!”
– Democrats on Weak attempt by the Democrats at a political slogan, 1840
“Seriously, Van Buren is a cockbiting fucktard.”
– User:Col.swordman on Senator Thaddeus Q. Swordman (Whig-MI)
The United States presidential election of 1840 saw President Martin Van Buren fight for re-election against an economic depression and a Whig Party unified for the first time behind war hero William Henry Harrison. Rallying behind the slogan "Tippecanoe and Tyler, too" (and copious amounts of alcohol), the Whigs easily defeated Van Buren.
Nominations[edit | edit source]
Whigs[edit | edit source]
Basically, the Whigs had two choices for their nominee. On the one hand, there was Senator Henry Clay of Kentuckistan, an experienced statesman who had repeatedly shown his ability to mediate between the two political parties over such contentious issues as slavery and states' rights, and orchestrating the Missouri Compromise, which significantly delayed either issue being resolved. He was by far the most qualified candidate the Whigs could field that year.
On the other hand, William Henry Harrison was a popular War Hero™ from the battle of Tippecanoe. And... um... at the time, he was working as a clerk in a courthouse.
Needless to say, Harrison won.
Democrats[edit | edit source]
As Martin Van Buren was already president, the Democrats pretty much had to give him the nomination, much like Jimmy Carter 140 years later.
Campaign[edit | edit source]
The Democrats' opening salvo[edit | edit source]
The Democratic Party knew they were in for an uphill battle — the country was in the midst of a major depression, and for some reason, the Democrats' proposed solution, "The government shouldn't do anything to help anybody at all," just wasn't resonating with the voters. Thus, when the Whigs nominated a frail, potentially senile 68-year-old man (much like Ronald Reagan 140 years later) from the backwoods state of Ohio,[1] Democrat-leaning newspapers saw the perfect chance for some good old-fashioned negative campaigning. These editors claimed that Harrison was an uncultured hick, better suited to "drinking hard cider on the porch of his log cabin."[2] Unfortunately, rather than arguing that reality proved these accusations wrong, the Whigs stunned everybody by agreeing with the Democrats and launching a massive campaign designed to convince the population that an old, drunken redneck would not only be qualified to be President, but would actually be a better choice than a guy who already had four years of experience in the position.
The log-cabin campaign[edit | edit source]
It would have been relatively easy for the Whigs to refute this backwoods hick image, as Harrison was a wealthy, upper-class man from a prominent Virginian family, but instead, they decided to embrace this image, framing Harrison's whole campaign around it. After all, it worked for the Democrats in 1824,[3] so why couldn't the Whigs make it work for them?
At the same time, they portrayed Van Buren, who came from a middle-class background, as an insensitive, aristocratic clod, who sipped champagne in his plush mansion in Washington, DC (which he called The White House — as if it somehow more important than all the other houses in the country that were painted white) while they languished in poverty.
The Whigs' 10-step plan for 1840[edit | edit source]
- Avoid the issues at all costs.
- Give the voters large amounts of hard cider and other, similar drinks.
- Catchy sloganeering and political songs.[4]
- More booze.[5]
- Bullshit "humble beginnings" story for well-born, disgustingly rich candidate. (This is why the Whigs wanted to get the voters drunk first.)
- Bring out some more hooch.
- Another round for everyone!
- By the way, Martin Van Buren accused your mother of being a woman of ill repute.
- Alcoholic beverages.
- Victory!
Wacky publicity stunts[edit | edit source]
In addition, the pro-Harrison rallies often included several publicity stunts which can really only be explained by the nationwide state of drunkenness. These included building log cabins in the middle of the streets, distributing coonskin[6] caps, repeated chants of the phrase "Tippecanoe and Tyler, too!" (which actually is pretty catchy if you say it out loud several times over), and rolling 6' tall leather balls from town to town.[7]
Election night, 1840[edit | edit source]
All through the campaign, the Whigs had made the intoxication of the electorate an important issue — they were most decidedly for it, and they saw no reason to discourage it as the voters went to the polls. As a result, Harrison won in a landslide, picking up 80% of the electoral votes.[8]
The movers and shakers in the Whig Party were delighted they controlled the House, the Senate, and the White House — nothing could get stop them from implementing their policies to remold the Union as they saw fit.[9]
Footnotes[edit | edit source]
- ↑ Apparently, at the time, Ohio had the highest concentration of rednecks north of the Mason-Dixon line.
- ↑ A word of advice to any would-be campaign strategists: when your negative political attacks end up making the target look better, your guy's pretty much toast.
- ↑ Though in that case Andrew Jackson really was a backwoods hick.
- ↑ Including one that went "Down with Martin Van Ruin." Adjusted for inflation, this slogan's modern equivalent would be approximately "Martin Van Buren is a goddamned son of a bitch."
- ↑ Which, at the time, was a slang term referring to Log Cabin Whiskey, manufactured by the E.G. Booz Distillery. (I am not making this up.)
- ↑ Racoon skin caps, you oversensitive liberal wiener.
- ↑ Look, they were drunk, alright?
- ↑ The "Look at me, I'm a stupid redneck" campaign strategy remains effective to this day (see George W. Bush).
- ↑ Nothing, that is, except for the pneumonia Harrison picked up when he delivered his two-hour Inauguration speech on a bitterly cold day without a coat. A month later, the Whigs found out that nominating someone for Vice President just because his name fits into a catchy political slogan isn't really the best way to go about choosing the nation's spare tire.