Uncyclopedia:Pee Review/This is NOT an endorsement
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
This is NOT an endorsement[edit source]
This is my fifth article in my career, and, quite frankly, I believe that it's my best one yet. Hope you enjoy it.
* Flumpa 
02:46, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
- Dibs. I like this article enough to review it, and i never review stuff. GO AWAY NAO! Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 02:53, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
| Humour: | 9 | Funny. This pee review pooped on recent changes, and for whatever reason possessed me to read it, and I loved it. The oxymoron of advertising everything possible while continuing to say that you weren't advertising is simple but highly effective. I think that linking to some of the products would help this point very well, but that would lead to having to look which ones do and don't have articles. |
| Concept: | 9 | A good concept. The whole NOT kind of page as being an oxymoron sometimes seems overdone, such as people creating this page does not exist, but the endorsements idea works pretty well. |
| Prose and formatting: | 10 | Good prose, everything flows, nothing too random, though the advertisements do make the article. |
| Images: | 9 | I think that the images go great with the article , and the coments follow the flow of the article almost perfectly. My favorite image was the Coca-cola pad. |
| Miscellaneous: | 8 | Republicans = bad. Fucking idiot bush. But thats just me. Also, it think that it needs more general wiki links, and as i said above, link to the products when they have articles. |
| Final Score: | 45 | A great article over all. Funny, witty, and well flowing. I get the feeling that this will do great at VFH, and if you'll excuse me, I would like to go nominate it. |
| Reviewer: | Lieutenant THEDUDEMAN Dude ... Totally UOTM KUN GotA F@H 03:18, 16 May 2008 (UTC) | |