UnNews talk:Overwhelming majority of men enjoy boobs

Look, I'll say this yet again. I know this is really hard to believe for some of you, but not everyone on Uncyclopedia is male.

76.190.199.242 21:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Or straight. Your point being? SKULLTHUMPER

If you're not a straight male, it's impossible to imagine what it would be like, I guess. I, personally, wasn't convinced by this article. I demand more research be done (ie. more pictures be posted) until I am satisfied that the results of this experiment are repeatable. (Also, I couldn't tell if that was a mole or a cigarette burn in that first picture.) --Pleb SYNDROME _{CUN medicate (butt poop!!!!)} 22:56, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Wow! A sex joke on uncyclopedia? This article is breaking through the glass ceiling... of sex! Le Cejak • <Apr 11, 2008 [22:59]>

Beats breaking the glass condom. Ow, man. Ow. Grand Generally Non-Asshat x1,916,281 and Doctor KUNDr .S . W H O R E ! UOTM YWG

I haven't started my flamewar for the day yet[edit source]

I get your point entirely: not everyone on Uncyclopedia is male. Clearly, this article isn't referring to the reader as such, but the writer. That's the extent of the joke, really, and it's fairly blunt in its delivery. You don't have to be male to laugh at ridiculously horny guys. There are certain articles which do depend on the user being male to retain full effectiveness, which isn't really desirable. This article, however, is not one of them. Ж Kalir, Wandering Hippie Salesman 23:28, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

Yeah, I hate male-centric articles. I hope I never see the day one of them gets featured. Also, don't waste your breath Kalir, as IPs are not people, merely automated accounts designed by Wikia to give us something to block or poke fun at.

Doctor Skullthumper

I'm going to ignore the rest of you peeps for a bit so I can just say...[edit source]

Best. UnNews. Article. Ever.

...

Okay, carry on. --The Dit 10:07, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

TITS!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Yeah, I think my writing really shines in this one. Pretty much. --So So 14:42, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Nom it! It will fail, but... --Sir DJ ~ Irreverent

15:11, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Nah, it'll get the usual fors from the resident anarchists, and the usual againsts from the resident conservatives, and distract people from voting on other articles on VFH that weren't conceived and written in less than an hour while drunk. I was kidding about my writing, by the way. --So So 03:31, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

There was writing in that article? Hmm.. Did I miss something? --