Talk:Lying

From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to Lying.
This is also a forum for spreading libelous rumors about the article's subject.
This is not a forum for general discussion about what you did last night. We have the Village Dump for things like that.

Article policies


Pure genius in four paragraphs!

--Jimmy Jazz 7th May, 2006

Wow. Wow.

--MorningSciFi 23:27, 18 June 2006 (UTC)

From Pee Review[edit source]

I found the article Lying on the VFD page and decided to take it on as a "pet project". It has been rewritten - Todd Lyons, Zombiebarron, Mhaille and Braydie have looked it over. I am seeking constructive help on punching it up. It would be helpful if the reviewer is critical to provide a bit more of a comment than "this section doesn't work" - I would like to know why it doesn't work so that I can improve it in the correct fashion and any helpful suugestions on how to make it better. Dame PPsigPPlips.gifGUN PotY WotM 2xPotM 17xVFH VFP Poo PMS •YAP• 16:32, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

Give me about six hours. --EMC [TALK] 21:47, 14 February 2007 (UTC)

The non sequiter links are overdone --Kelpan 22:59, 27 February 2007 (UTC)

Humour: 7 I agree with Kelpan - too many non sequiters spoilt the broth.
Concept: 8 I liked the idea of an Uncyclopedian article on lying; it'd be like Honesty.
Prose and formatting: 7 No mistakes I could spot, yet the set out wasn't too good.
Images: 5 Maybe too random.
Miscellaneous: 4 Speaking as an Australian, we would NEVER want Steve Bastard Irwin as Prime Minister. I strongly object to being a)given a stereotype like Steve Irwin and b)getting such a clot as him for Prime Minister. We thought Howard was bad.
Final Score: 31 Alright, not great.
Reviewer: Ikabu 05:53, 21 March 2007 (UTC)