From Uncyclopedia, the content-free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search

From Pee Review[edit]


Spent a while on this. Hope you all enjoy my sherious with oddities sense of humor. High fives under the table for all! Just some feedback and what not, help me out with it! --Quall 10:26, 23 May 2007 (UTC) Laughter a link to my article. Thank you.

Humour: 4.5 Low because score annihilated from too many true facts or humor too dry
Concept: 6.5 weakened by humor score
Prose and formatting: 10 Very goodly wrote, and comprehsionable
Images: 7 Need more images
Miscellaneous: 4 This was't sporked from wikipedia was it?
Final Score: 32 Its a good article, but I'm left hanging waiting for a gag or punchline.
Reviewer: H. Peebles - D - HS KUN.png Foolitzer.png Icons-flag-pi.PNG 03:30, 25 May 2007 (UTC)

  • Note = Not sporked from wiki, totally off the top of my head.

I'll review it too.

Humour: 7 I found this pretty funny, but expansion and more jokes would help.
Concept: 8 I'm surprised none of our experienced writers have done this one yet.
Prose and formatting: 8 The format and grammar is good, but expansion would help. Also, the ending doesn't seem to work for me. Perhaps making the ending like a conclusion would be better.
Images: 6 Need more images.
Miscellaneous: 7 This was't sporked from wikipedia was it? No, of course it was't. But, as I mentioned before, expansion is needed.
Final Score: 36 Expand this, give it more jokes and images and this could well be feature worthy.
Reviewer: Icons-flag-au.png Sir Cs1987 UOTM. t. c 07:26, 25 May 2007 (UTC)