Talk:Do NOT Delete this Article
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
????!!!??!?!?!??![edit source]
This Article was Quasi-Featured and its stamped with NRV!!!!!!!!!!! WHAT THE HELL????--Witt E, 21:22, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- *draws another chalkline* --~ sin($) tan(€) 21:25, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Heh heh heh. Just imagine if it was really featured... man, that'd be freaking mindblowing! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
- We COULD feature it... --Micoolio101 23:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
- That would ruin Tompkins's already fragile brain further. --The Zombiebaron 00:03, 21 September 2006 (UTC)
- We COULD feature it... --Micoolio101 23:59, 20 September 2006 (UTC)Micoolio101
- Heh heh heh. Just imagine if it was really featured... man, that'd be freaking mindblowing! t o m p k i n s blah. ﺞوﻦ וףה ՃՄ ண்ஸ ފއހ วอฏม +տ trade websites 20:41, 12 April 2006 (UTC)
Question...[edit source]
is it all right to delete part of the article?
One More Question...[edit source]
ANY of the article? One word? Deleting it but not saving the changes?
- Guess. --My page is broken? (Yes, dumbass! Get to it!) 13:41, May 25, 2011 (UTC)
Save this poor SOB[edit source]
This article should stay. Don't kill it! The dang thing if actually rather funny. --Ggarfield 06:28, 27 November 2007 (UTC)
Boring![edit source]
Thank you Tompkins, Hinoa, Electrostatic, Dawg, et al. for making such a terrible article. You should work for the idiots at MAD TV—not to be confused with the idiots at Mad Magazine, who are not really idiots.—Aybabtu 23:25, 15 April 2009 (UTC)